RE: Porsche Reveals Hybrid 918 Spyder

RE: Porsche Reveals Hybrid 918 Spyder

Author
Discussion

Dagnut

3,515 posts

195 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
The Wookie said:
Alex said:
What a joke. Laps the 'Ring in 7m 30s and does 78mpg? Possibly, but not at the same time.

I could get the same result by fitting a milk-float engine to a TVR. Or a V8 to a milk-float.
If it did 78 mpg and a 7.30 ring time at the same time it'd probably have to produce more fuel than it uses as it goes round.

Yes, you could perhaps get that result from fitting a milk float engine to a TVR, assuming you fitted it to the front wheels and left the V8 powering the rears... And had the ability to make a suitable control system.

I don't see how that dimishes the achievement...
The point is it can potentially do 78mpg, that's enough to get it around the regulations, and who cares if in reality it does 10mpg? This is going to have, potentially, 710hp at 1460kg...

wildman0609

885 posts

178 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
how can porsche produce a 3.4 litre engine with 500bhp at a price which people would be willing to pay for, its 147bhp a litre. most super cars have around 100bhp per litre. then add in the costs of what looks like one of the best hybrid systems proposed. i see this car costing £500,000+

i don't see porsche making this but maybe a cheaper 911 price version.

styling is amazing

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

216 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
roberthiggs said:
and those side exhausts are TACCY
I quite like them, but they are like that as the engine installation seems to be straight out of the racing car for this concept. I daresay that legislation in at least one of the major markets for the car will dictate that any production version will be more prosaic... rolleyes

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

216 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
wildman0609 said:
how can porsche produce a 3.4 litre engine with 500bhp at a price which people would be willing to pay for
Carrera GT. It too was built around an engine purpose built for racing (though the actual racing project was sadly stillborn due to rules changes at the ACO. That particular item in race trim and deprived of its restrictors was reputed to be good for comfortably in excess of 800hp before it was sanitised for road use).

The CGT (inflation adjusted, or even somewhat higher) is the price point that we should expect this piece of exotica to be pitched at if it should see series production. Anyone expecting it to be a volume item starting in the 5 to low 6 figure range really wasn't paying any attention to the spec sheet. And even at half a million quid or more, it will find eager buyers. Even in this economic climate. yes

Ravell

1,181 posts

214 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all
That looks astonishingly good!

Porsche really got the mix right on this one. Shame it won't look anywhere near as good once it's been watered down for production, just like the original Boxter concept.

GTRene

16,905 posts

226 months

Tuesday 2nd March 2010
quotequote all










lovely double board canon


anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
wow, just wow.

screw the hybrid, stick a gt3rs engine in it and sell it to me now!!!

biggrin

OlberJ

14,101 posts

235 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all


I'd buy that for a dollar. Or maybe even half a million of them.

OlberJ

14,101 posts

235 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Not sure if you're ripping the piss or not but they were just some OZ SL's stolen from an Mx5 of all things.

OlberJ

14,101 posts

235 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
And i'll point out now, those proportions look just about perfect for an Mr2 replica boxedin

evile

94 posts

209 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Ravell said:
That looks astonishingly good!

Porsche really got the mix right on this one. Shame it won't look anywhere near as good once it's been watered down for production, just like the original Boxter concept.
I've heard this comment several times today. Yes, the production Boxster was watered down quite a bit from the concept. The Boxster is a high volume production vehicle for Porsche. However, there wasn't much difference between the prototype and production Carrera GTs. The 918 Spyder IS the replacement for the Carrera GT.

According to Porsche R&D Chief, Wolfgang Durheimer, the production 918 Spyder will cost more than the Carrera GT. At that price point the design team won't have to make many cost saving concessions to the styling. Durheimer also stated the 918 will be a limited production model. He estimated between 750 and 1300 units.

Edited by evile on Wednesday 3rd March 02:03

TotalControl

8,130 posts

200 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
10 from me. It looks really, REALLY good.

ge0rge

3,053 posts

207 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
JMo22 said:
Wowoweeewahhh..have Porsche ended their styling rut?
Looks that way doesnt itsmile

tgx4776

241 posts

193 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Styling Yes and I despise Porsche but I'd buy this. I could swear I have seen those taillights on an audi some where....


Whats the deal with hydrogen? why are no manufacturers making hydrogen powered sports/super cars?

chuntington101

5,733 posts

238 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
havoc said:
chuntington101 said:
Just needs a couple of turbos strapped to that V8 now smile
No it most emphatically DOES NOT! Turbo's are for the lazy and those who don't care about how an engine behaves.

Thankfully Porsche (as evidenced by the Carerra GT and generations of GT3s) does care, as do I. I'll take mine gloriously n/asp with just the 500bhp thanks! biggrin
havoc, clearly you prefer N/A to Forced induction but could you please expalne your comments? How are turbos lazy? and for people that dont care about how and engine behaves?

Also could you exsplane the comment on Porsche not liking turbos? it just seems alittle strange as their 911 has come in turbo modle for YEARS, Also porsche have been at the cutrting edge when it comes to turbo tech for many decades now.......

Cheers,

Chris.

havoc

30,300 posts

237 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
chuntington101 said:
havoc said:
chuntington101 said:
Just needs a couple of turbos strapped to that V8 now smile
No it most emphatically DOES NOT! Turbo's are for the lazy and those who don't care about how an engine behaves.

Thankfully Porsche (as evidenced by the Carrera GT and generations of GT3s) does care, as do I. I'll take mine gloriously n/asp with just the 500bhp thanks! biggrin
havoc, clearly you prefer N/A to Forced induction but could you please expalne your comments? How are turbos lazy? and for people that dont care about how and engine behaves?

Also could you exsplane the comment on Porsche not liking turbos? it just seems alittle strange as their 911 has come in turbo modle for YEARS, Also porsche have been at the cutrting edge when it comes to turbo tech for many decades now.......

Cheers,

Chris.
Chris,

1) Turbo's give easy access to power at low-revs (through significantly greater torque), and across a large rev-range. Which means you don't need to use the gearbox as much to get 90% of the performance out of the engine. Usually the engine of choice for someone who just wants "POWER" and doesn't care how they get it.

2) A turbo necessarily blunts the throttle-response of an engine, vs naturally-aspirated (however with the advent of DBW n/a engines have been dragged-down somewhat in this regard! frown ). And it also means the power isn't delivered in a linear fashion...with n/a you know exactly how the power will be delivered through the rev-range. With a turbo you WILL get a slug of torque at some point...modern turbo's are better in this regard than old-school stuff, but it's still there.

3) I didn't say Porsche didn't like turbos, I just said they care about engine behaviour...look at the cars I mentioned and their engines are the epitomy of high-tech, low-inertia and truly instant-response...and they're delivering 100bhp/litre from an n/a repeatedly! Porsche have long been among the 3 best builders of (semi-mainstream) n/a engines - BMW & Honda being the others. And the Porsche engines are perhaps the closest to the circuit in their build and approach.

4) Weight and complexity - turbo, plumbing, intercooler, more plumbing, perhaps a bigger rad for more cooling...it's something else to go wrong, and it's additional weight (although I accept the argument that you can use a turbo with a smaller-capacity unit to get the same output...but would you rather a blown-4 or a n/asp V6?!?)

5) Finally, sound and range. Compare a GT3 to a Turbo. Compare the Carrera GT to any turbo'd competitors. Compare an S2000 to an Audi TT, or a CTR to a Golf. Turbo's muffle an engine. Turbo's also typically don't work at low AND at high-revs, so you either get something lazy and truculent low-down (think older STi's) or something which is out of puff before 6,000rpm (most modern turbo-petrols, sadly). The solution is the more expensive sequential-twins (BMW -35i) or twin-scroll units (Porsche), which ARE very good engines.

But I still don't think turbo's have any place in a proper sports-car. GTs, hot-hatches, big execs - yeah, sure. But not sports-cars, and certainly not supercars.

militantmandy

3,829 posts

188 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
OlberJ said:


I'd buy that for a dollar. Or maybe even half a million of them.
Looks even better with those wheels. The real world pics above are amazing. This thing is just mind-bogglinhly stunning.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

250 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
That swoopy line from nose over the front wheel arch along the shoulder and over the rear wheel arch is becoming the new Porsche trademark.....I remember buying the Porsche Boxster game for the Playstation 1....in the intro it showed Harm lagaay sketching the Boxster form, and I think he started with a line just like that.
Boxster, Cayman, CGT and now 918.... very pure.
Photocopier or not, Porsche know about timeless class and style in its basic form. I'm actually quite taken aback by the almost total agreement here for this car... and it's a Porsche??!!

ewenm

28,506 posts

247 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
Agoogy said:
I'm actually quite taken aback by the almost total agreement here for this car... and it's a Porsche??!!
Just goes to show that those who decry many as "Porsche-haters" are wrong - people don't hate Porsche, they hate lazy, predictable design. As soon as Porsche produce something interesting and a bit different (despite it still having many of their standard styling cues), people like it.

Streetrod

6,468 posts

208 months

Wednesday 3rd March 2010
quotequote all
First the boring question, as great as that car looks, (I can’t believe I am actually saying that about a modern day Porsche) does it have any type of roof or soft top??

And second, who would care to estimate how many speculative deposits Porsche will have taken on this car before the show ends?? I will guarantee you that if Porsche are able to deliver that car to market looking almost exactly like that then I predict that the 918 will command the highest premiums for any new car hitting the second hand market. If you have the money folks I suggest you jump in you private jet to Geneva now or make a B-line to your local Porsche dealer.