RE: Alfa Romeo 4C - first official pictures
Discussion
otolith said:
There is already loads of choice of heavy, powerful sportscars in the 30-40k area. Just buy a Z4 or a TT or a Boxster or an SLK or a 370Z instead.
The collaboration with Mazda is going to be more that sort of affordable roadster thing.
Im talking slashing 10k off the price and do without the fancy lightweight tub and all that. I doubt without this fancy tub or w.e it is the weight would balloon to Z4ish weights of 1400-1500kg or w/e it is. A 370z is also much heavier and a SLK. A TT isn't a sports car, and nothing like this lol. The collaboration with Mazda is going to be more that sort of affordable roadster thing.
Hope it does well. To be fair Lotus have done alright selling there cars with toyota lumps which were hardly a quality choice, but then they do handle and ride and steer better than pretty much anything, and there usually not near 50k hehe.
Vee12V said:
Rumor is €50.000 (roughly £43.000), not £50.000.
I was thinking that all along actually. I wouldn't be surprised if it was €50K inc. tax and hopefully Alfa will realise it will need to translate to £40K somehow.Not sure if a CF tub costs that much more than aluminium. If you don't have the aluminium technology nor the tools then I suppose the investment would be massive anyway so you might as well get someone to do it for you out of CF in Italy for instance. Actually the low volume may lend itself better to CF than alu from a cost POV. CF is not exactly new nor cutting edge, it's been around for 25 years I guess and judging by the tumbling price of CF bicycle frames over the past 10 years, I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't make alu obsolete pretty soon. at least for low production numbers.
When I made an enquiry about the price, the salesman was under the impression it would be nearer the .. £50 k mark. Kind of put me off. Trying to explain to the misses I'd just got us into 4 years finance for a new lotus elise with an alfa badge would have been painful.
But nice light sports cars should be the way forward. Cheap ones too. Everything has gone fat in the last 39 years. We as a nation are obsessed with bigger is better.
But nice light sports cars should be the way forward. Cheap ones too. Everything has gone fat in the last 39 years. We as a nation are obsessed with bigger is better.
Assuming the price point for the 4C will rival the Cayman, while assuming further that the Cayman will be better built, engineered and handle better. I think the 4C has a good chance as a Cayman rival, as I think the looks have a £10k value, over those of the Cayman.
Does that make sense?![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
Does that make sense?
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
DJRC said:
Alfahorn said:
DJRC said:
kambites said:
DJRC said:
Dear Alfa...the £50k Exige? ITS GOT 350 f
kING PONIES YOU BRAINDEAD HALFWITS!!!!!!!!!!!!
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
![frown](/inc/images/frown.gif)
How can you make 2 of the most traffic stopping, attention grabbing cars of the last 10 yrs and f
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
How??????
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
So, how the f
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Its doing a Lotus when Lotus have already spent a lifetime demonstrating it doesnt work.
Bottom line...at £50k you arent f
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Im not a Cayman lover, I have no interest in it. This was and for last 2 yrs always has been a straight for my cash between the Exige Roadster and the 4C and trust me, its been bloody depressing watching both try to cock up.
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Until you get the opportunity to test the product how the hell can you give a judgement on it? It's blatantly ridiculously. I'm equally certain DD (as you refer to him, although to be fair he does use his initials when signing off some of his E-mails in my experience) has not confided details of the products as you seem to suggest.
Why on earth anyone would want a car like the 4C to be practical is beyond me.
Alfahorn said:
you have absolutelly know idea about the extent of my knowledge and experience with Alfa so trying to be the big man with me will not work.
Until you get the opportunity to test the product how the hell can you give a judgement on it?
Have you driven the car yet, or do you know anyone who has? This car could turn out to be a game changer.Until you get the opportunity to test the product how the hell can you give a judgement on it?
Mermaid said:
Alfahorn said:
you have absolutelly know idea about the extent of my knowledge and experience with Alfa so trying to be the big man with me will not work.
Until you get the opportunity to test the product how the hell can you give a judgement on it?
Have you driven the car yet, or do you know anyone who has? This car could turn out to be a game changer.Until you get the opportunity to test the product how the hell can you give a judgement on it?
It is lovely but as a die hard Alfa nut I have to agree with DJRC in that they have have had an open goal for over two years since concept and should have produced a game changer not faffed about...... Mind, I still prefer the original Diva concept......
http://www.autoblog.it/post/3581/alfa-diva-alfa-da...
http://www.autoblog.it/post/3581/alfa-diva-alfa-da...
arguti said:
It is lovely but as a die hard Alfa nut I have to agree with DJRC in that they have have had an open goal for over two years since concept and should have produced a game changer not faffed about...... Mind, I still prefer the original Diva concept......
http://www.autoblog.it/post/3581/alfa-diva-alfa-da...
A game changer in what respect? http://www.autoblog.it/post/3581/alfa-diva-alfa-da...
I find it amazing people are so quick to judge a product when so little information is known.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff