RE: SVO fuses 550hp V8 with Range Rover Velar

RE: SVO fuses 550hp V8 with Range Rover Velar

Author
Discussion

NomduJour

19,198 posts

261 months

Tuesday 5th February 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
Considering the deal to buy the engine from
ford is ending next year I am surprised they have put it into yet another car that is, I assume, intended to sell beyond the end of next year.
It isn’t, one year only.

craigjm

18,100 posts

202 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
NomduJour said:
craigjm said:
Considering the deal to buy the engine from
ford is ending next year I am surprised they have put it into yet another car that is, I assume, intended to sell beyond the end of next year.
It isn’t, one year only.
So have they extended the deal to buy the engine? It was supposed to finish in 2020.

bakerstreet

4,779 posts

167 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
Cold said:
Some seem to be insinuating that a car manufacturing company shouldn't try to sell a new car if their sales are down and they certainly shouldn't attempt to sell a quick version of an existing product (a cheap way of generating interest) while the next generation of product is under its final stage of development.
What next generation? It's based on a shorted D5 platform? And that will be four years old by the time the Defender 2 goes to market.

Barga

12,241 posts

208 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Discontinued a while back.

jack_86

335 posts

94 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
This might cause some hate, but the biggest detractor in the Land Rover brand is the fact they are so close to jaguar, I’m sorry but to me they leave me uninspired and cold, and they don’t sell it’s all well and good releasing near on £90k cars when the brand is performing but releasing a car that is supposed to be a sort of entry into the brand is crazy

redroadster

1,770 posts

234 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
They wonder why they have falling sales ? Too much money not enough footballers.

E65Ross

35,175 posts

214 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
redroadster said:
They wonder why they have falling sales ? Too much money not enough footballers.
This doesn't really make sense. Are you using the age-old cliche that only footballers buy this car, I can't quite work it out....it almost sounds like you are, but then you say there aren't enough footballers. You say "too much money"....do you mean the vehicle price, or the JLR brand? I can't assume the latter after reading the news the last few weeks. So I think you're saying "it costs too much, but there aren't enough footballers"?

Either way, bit of an old cliche.

NomduJour

19,198 posts

261 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
jack_86 said:
This might cause some hate, but the biggest detractor in the Land Rover brand is the fact they are so close to jaguar, I’m sorry but to me they leave me uninspired and cold, and they don’t sell it’s all well and good releasing near on £90k cars when the brand is performing but releasing a car that is supposed to be a sort of entry into the brand is crazy
You sound rather confused.

daveco

4,150 posts

209 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
DP33 said:
Prefer the Jag on balance but would like someone from JLR to explain, (genuine question) the positioning of the two models because it appears to me that the overlap between them is just too great - surely aimed at a very similar target market?
It's all down to preference. Porsche and Audi (and to a lesser extent Skoda/SEAT) have similar SUVs with similar performance on the same platform. If you like the look of one over the other, or prefer one brand to the other, the choice is there.


I'd plump for the Velar every time over the Jag, as I think the Jag looks too similar to other SUVs. The Velar to me, is one of the best looking cars available with a fairly unique/sleek silhouette.

And its got cool door handles hehe

Vocht

1,631 posts

166 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
DP33 said:
(genuine question) the positioning of the two models because it appears to me that the overlap between them is just too great - surely aimed at a very similar target market?
To me the SVautobigraphy range and the SVR range are clearly different propositions...

SVA being the 'ultimate power, ultimate luxury' range, and SVR being the 'ultimate power, ultimate performance' range. Think S550 vs S63. They could brand it better to be more distinct though.

1974foggy

682 posts

146 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
Frimley111R said:
blademansw said:
Looks fantastic, but its going to spend more time in the dealer getting fixed than being on the road ;-)
Nice trolling rolleyes
Blademansw speaks the truth though

SydneySE

406 posts

262 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
craigjm said:
So have they extended the deal to buy the engine? It was supposed to finish in 2020.
not so far...

https://www.carthrottle.com/post/jaguars-v6-and-v8...


The velar looks great, the v8 is epic. Shame they will sell very few of the v8s, and as usual, far more boring diesels.... in a couple of years, they will be electric only no doubt... in line with Jaguar..

bertie

8,550 posts

286 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
I saw a Velar parked next to a Range Rover Sport the other day and one thing struck me instantly.....suddenly the Sport looks very, very old.

Whether this is the Velar effect or whether the Sport has just aged badly, but to me it's looking really old hat now, there was no appreciable size differance, not sure why anyone would go Sport instead of Velar.

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
redroadster said:
They wonder why they have falling sales ? Too much money not enough footballers.
This doesn't really make sense. Are you using the age-old cliche that only footballers buy this car, I can't quite work it out....it almost sounds like you are, but then you say there aren't enough footballers. You say "too much money"....do you mean the vehicle price, or the JLR brand? I can't assume the latter after reading the news the last few weeks. So I think you're saying "it costs too much, but there aren't enough footballers"?

Either way, bit of an old cliche.
It’s just the usual shyte that gets trotted out on JLR threads by people who are long on personal prejudices but short on fact.

The repeated mention of dropping sales and references to the people who buy these cars in the U.K. and that they won’t sell any expensive V8s here is a case in point.

It’s a fundamental lack of understanding about what the underlying issues are facing the luxury auto market as a whole.

I’m not sure any of the hard of thinking JLR bashets have told us yet what the Chinese version of orange faced, pcp, school run Mum, married to a footballer is ...

NomduJour

19,198 posts

261 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
bertie said:
not sure why anyone would go Sport instead of Velar.
Sport is bigger inside, can have seven seats, tows a tonne more, can have a low range box, better off road etc.

cayman-black

12,710 posts

218 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
stumpage said:
bluemason said:
The macan is a much superior car when it come to performance and looks.
Looks like you've driven them both. How was the Macan more superior? What made the performance and feel of the SVO Velar so much worse than the Macan?



Edited by stumpage on Tuesday 5th February 14:23
pmsl. that Macan is fking awful.

Barga

12,241 posts

208 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
bertie said:
I saw a Velar parked next to a Range Rover Sport the other day and one thing struck me instantly.....suddenly the Sport looks very, very old.

Whether this is the Velar effect or whether the Sport has just aged badly, but to me it's looking really old hat now, there was no appreciable size differance, not sure why anyone would go Sport instead of Velar.
Have you driven both?

J4CKO

41,788 posts

202 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
Not something I would buy but it is a looker and it will be a fantastic thing to drive.

I dont get the hatred and footballer/school run stuff, what is so worthy about what you do for employment and what exciting stuff do you do with your car day to day ?

The owners will decide they want a car and go to the dealership, look at the brochures, have a spin in on and order it, they probably wont spend a lot of their time arguing about its validity and defending their choice on here, they will just use it for whatever job they deem suitable and then trade it in at some point having rather enjoyed it in all likelihood, unaware that Barry92Doncaster and EP3GAV arent keen. The owners of a Velar SV whatsit probably dont fancy an 18 year old MX5, project TVR, tired RS6 or immaculate 2007 M3 either.

Its no more or less pointless of any other choice of car, they all do broadly the same job carting people and stuff, we could all probably manage most stuff we do with a 1 litre supermini, do we want to ?

Equilibrium25

653 posts

136 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
bertie said:
I saw a Velar parked next to a Range Rover Sport the other day and one thing struck me instantly.....suddenly the Sport looks very, very old.

Whether this is the Velar effect or whether the Sport has just aged badly, but to me it's looking really old hat now, there was no appreciable size differance, not sure why anyone would go Sport instead of Velar.
Whereas I went into a dealer, gave the Velar 3 seconds, loved the RRS and wished the Discovery had a better looking rear to make me love that too. Different buyers want different things. The Velar range is not on my radar, but I can see why people like them.

J4CKO

41,788 posts

202 months

Wednesday 6th February 2019
quotequote all
The newer sport still looks current but overnight the original one went from looking ok to old and upright.