Will cars ever stop getting bigger and heavier?!
Discussion
To the OP... Look up Mazda and Skyactive.
Mazda are talking about losing at least 100 Kg's for each new model replacement
Even before their new range arrives, take a look at the current Mazda2, which is 100 Kg's lighter than the old shoe shaped model and nearly 200 Kg's lighter than a Peugeot 207!!
Mazda are talking about losing at least 100 Kg's for each new model replacement
Even before their new range arrives, take a look at the current Mazda2, which is 100 Kg's lighter than the old shoe shaped model and nearly 200 Kg's lighter than a Peugeot 207!!
Oldandslow said:
Each model seems to get larger with each new incarnation and then new entry level models are created to fill the bottom niche. I suppose marketing revolves around being bigger and better than the last one.
e.g.
3 series - 1 series BMW,
VW Polo - VW Up(Lupo, Fox)
Ford Fiesta - Ford Ka
Glad I' not the only one that has noticed this. Manufacturers keep making bigger and heavier cars because that is apparently what the public want. But at the same time introducing smaller models at the bottom of the range because that's what people want?!?!e.g.
3 series - 1 series BMW,
VW Polo - VW Up(Lupo, Fox)
Ford Fiesta - Ford Ka
Megaflow said:
Glad I' not the only one that has noticed this. Manufacturers keep making bigger and heavier cars because that is apparently what the public want. But at the same time introducing smaller models at the bottom of the range because that's what people want?!?!
The manufacturers want to differentiate a new model from the previous one so that people feel the need to buy a new car, one way is to give the car more space which can make it bigger.Isn't it Mazda who are now operating the 'gram strategy' where every part is a gram less than the previous one (obviously the bigger the part the more weight is being lost) as there form of improving fuel consumption, also instead of investing stupid amounts of money in hybrid systems they're working on the current petrol and diesel engines efficiency to improve emissions and consumption even further. IMO that's the best solution any manufacturer has at the moment, until hydrogen becomes more widely available anyway.
Urban Sports said:
Pints said:
Have just checked this and it would appear I was correct.
Golf
mk6: 1299kg
mk5: 1451kg
Polo
mk5: 1057kg
mk4: 1095kg
Like for like models? I find that surprising with the Golf.Golf
mk6: 1299kg
mk5: 1451kg
Polo
mk5: 1057kg
mk4: 1095kg
Mk5- 1411,
Mk6- 1420 (both 3 door models)
As for the XJ, did you know that the one tested and weighted by Autocar was 1960kgs. Not much better than a 7 series.
My theory is this. Although the base models may be getting slightly lighter, all the optional extra crap is getting more comprehensive so by the time your typical 320d sport on optional wheels with gismos is weighed, it is heavier than the older less well spec'd car. I believe the 911, as tested by Autocar next week will end up heavier than the old model they tested, which was 1420 KGs...lets see if Im right!!
However, Madza are thankfully getting their models lighter. Lets hope others follow....
Edited by StevieB on Thursday 1st March 17:07
Edited by StevieB on Thursday 1st March 17:08
Pints said:
Yes. I compared 3dr tdi (2.0 Golf; 1.2 Polo) for each.
Looking at them next to each other, it's quite believable.
Ummm the mk5 polo is larger than a mk4... so not sure how it can look lighter. In actual fact the car is lighter but not smaller.Looking at them next to each other, it's quite believable.
The same is true for mk6 golf vs mk5 the current car is larger (slightly) than the previous.
The weight reductions will IHMO be down to the use of high strength steel to reduce overall steel thickness and engine development work.
Bigwigs and Governments keep pressuring car makers to make cars more economical and eco-friendly - which is expensive. Customers want cars made so well they never go wrong - which is expensive. Customers want lovely comfortable large fast cars which do 150mpg - which is expensive. Customers also want all of this to be cheap - well you get the idea.
Something has to give eventually.
Something has to give eventually.
Superhoop said:
To the OP... Look up Mazda and Skyactive.
Skyactiv not Skyactive but that's some impressive technology they have going, the bit I rather like though is this bit of have your cake and eat it:http://www.caradvice.com.au/104992/mazda-skyactive-technology-driven/ said:
SKYACTIV-G is what Mazda’s next generation petrol engines are called, and just like the diesel versions, is a product of breakthrough technology. This is a highly-efficient direct injection 2.0-litre engine with an extremely high compression ratio (14.0:1), that develops 15 percent more low- and mid-range torque than the Mazda’s current 2.0-litre petrol powertrain. Not only that; remarkably, fuel consumption falls 15 percent to around the same rate the current diesel engine uses.
So more power than current petrol *and* the same mpg as their current diesel (and I'd assume CO2 levels would reflect that). When can I get one? Anyway, back on topic. I'm shocked at current car weights. Hell I was shocked the other day when I opened the bonnet on the MPS the other day, the weight of it in comparison to the RX-8 is incredible. I can't see it keeping going up though, the way the focus is on reducing emissions and increasing mpg means manufacturers will *have* to reduce weight, there is only so much can be done with stop/start and other bodges to get 'round' the tests.
Although saying about the RX-8, having looked quite a bit at the mechanicals its a curious mix of lightweight and heavy cost cutting items. Makes you wonder just how much better it could have been still if it was say 200kg lighter.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff