RE: Toyota confirms open-top GT 86

RE: Toyota confirms open-top GT 86

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
The styling already looks out of date! by the time its on sale things will have moved on!

Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
This is how you do a photoshop;







trunks82

252 posts

199 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Hellbound said:
This is how you do a photoshop;




Mmmm.cant see subaru doing a soft top but good effort.

tommy vercetti

11,490 posts

164 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Has the actual car gone on sale? Feels like Toyota has been talking about this for centuries.

GeoffW

360 posts

251 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Have never seen so many headline stories about what is, at best, a fairly interesting motor (GT 86 and derivatives such as this soft top).

Can only conclude that Toyota are paying PH towers for excessive coverage.

No suprise really, just observing.

tommy vercetti

11,490 posts

164 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
GeoffW said:
Have never seen so many headline stories about what is, at best, a fairly interesting motor (GT 86 and derivatives such as this soft top).

Can only conclude that Toyota are paying PH towers for excessive coverage.

No suprise really, just observing.
They got Riggers on the payroll wink

Gizmo!

18,150 posts

210 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
GeoffW said:
Have never seen so many headline stories about what is, at best, a fairly interesting motor (GT 86 and derivatives such as this soft top).

Can only conclude that Toyota are paying PH towers for excessive coverage.

No suprise really, just observing.
Not just PH. The internet has gone mad for this thing. Did you see how long the other threads went?

carinaman

21,370 posts

173 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
They need to do a Z3M Coupe breadvan type sporting estate. smile

ItsaTVR

254 posts

154 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
lol i love the PH dodgy photoshops smile
With Toyota's more recent convertibles, I'll be surprised if this version isn't better than the real thing smile

And don't look to Nissan for any help.

They should hire Helllbound, he makes it look so simple! I'd buy that...

Edited by ItsaTVR on Saturday 3rd March 01:09

Kawasicki

13,110 posts

236 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
GeoffW said:
Have never seen so many headline stories about what is, at best, a fairly interesting motor (GT 86 and derivatives such as this soft top).

Can only conclude that Toyota are paying PH towers for excessive coverage.

No suprise really, just observing.
I'm a fan of cheap, rwd cars that are fun to drive. The fact that this car is made by Toyota may be signalling the start of a shift away from modified fwd hatchback based coupes, towards better (to drive) rwd coupes.

I don't think the coverage is excessive, so Toyota may need to pay PH way more.

Well done to Subaru/Toyota for developing this car, and well done to the motoring press for promoting it. It may just help stop the rot.

One other point, if Toyota and Subaru can still make money on the basic versions, it just shows how much money other companies must be making on simpler fwd cars. Either that or rwd is not much more expensive than fwd to build, which is probably closer to the truth.



carinaman

21,370 posts

173 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
One other point, if Toyota and Subaru can still make money on the basic versions, it just shows how much money other companies must be making on simpler fwd cars. Either that or rwd is not much more expensive than fwd to build, which is probably closer to the truth.
Doesn't it say online somewhere that the original MX-5 was cheaper to make than the RWD 323 but could be priced much higher than the 323?

Perhaps the predominance of FWD is also to do with sharing common platforms and parts?

Rs2oo

2,196 posts

199 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Not impressed. Blank piece of paper and the designers have come up with the safe option in styling. Pensioners will love it. Are they from Hyundai ?

rajkohli81

311 posts

207 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Gizmo! said:
Not just PH. The internet has gone mad for this thing. Did you see how long the other threads went?
Too many web pages in my opinion and a great deal of that into how outdated and frankly ugly the car is with a few "oh I've almost wet myself, I can't wait to put a deposit down" posters

BILL PAYER

526 posts

180 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Toyota and Subaru had a blank sheet of paper to work off of when designing this car and it could have been special, instead what we have is an ugly cheap looking non event. As if that wasnt bad enough they now compound the matter by taking the roof off

gmh23

252 posts

181 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Will it still be a "4-seater" in convertible form?

KM666

1,757 posts

184 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
tommy vercetti said:
Has the actual car gone on sale? Feels like Toyota has been talking about this for centuries.
Toyota sent me a preliminary brochure at the start of the week but it didn't give any clues, though I suppose if they've got to the brochure stage having paint options it cant be far off.

Shurv

966 posts

161 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
Toyota dealers have already ordered their showroom stock and colour choice.They WILL be in the showrooms from June.For all those whining about the cost of the car, have a look accross other manufacturers price lists and see what £ 25k will buy you,some pretty ordinary stuff.I've seen one in the flesh (coupe)and it looks amazing,the droptop will be a canvas roof so will have a decent boot and no added weight ( or suffer from "fat arse syndrome" like the metal folders do).The whole point of this car is that the basic car will be great,with encouragement from Toyota to modify the thing with wheels,suspension,bodykits etc so you make it look how you want it.The next thing to it ( ie rear drive,good handling etc, costs rather a lot more for no more fun and a load more running costs.

flattotheboards

6,683 posts

207 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
The GT86/BRZ is IMO one of the most exciting cars in years as it has all the correct ingredients to make a great car at a relatively attainable cost. Making it into a convertible is a great idea as it broadens the potential market so that people who like the concept of the coupe but prefer drop tops won't be left out. I hope this car is the success it deserves to be, as Toyota/Subaru have made a genuinely interesting car for drivers.

LukeyLikey

855 posts

148 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
trunks82 said:
Mmmm.cant see subaru doing a soft top but good effort.
If Toyota launch so will Subaru no doubt - they engineered and make the GT86

burrows98

10 posts

148 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
I think the hardtop is good but the roadster no so, just stick to the origional.