Dealership Acid Attack

Author
Discussion

POORCARDEALER

8,528 posts

243 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Car probably needed brake pads after a year, so he came on here, got advised to reject the car under SOGA, garage wouldnt play ball........

daemon

35,976 posts

199 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
POORCARDEALER said:
Car probably needed brake pads after a year, so he came on here, got advised to reject the car under SOGA, garage wouldnt play ball........
LOL

petrolsniffer

2,461 posts

176 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
POORCARDEALER said:
Car probably needed brake pads after a year, so he came on here, got advised to reject the car under SOGA, garage wouldnt play ball........
roflrofl

sc0tt

18,064 posts

203 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Studio117 said:
hehe
Blimey, I am surprised you are up this early wink

Visionist

120 posts

152 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Better the cars attacked with acid than the dealer's face I suppose...

crispyshark

1,262 posts

147 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
crispyshark said:
Bearing in mind where it is, I'd go with protection he hasn't paid.

Bit like saying a fire in a Liverpool nightclub is a random arson attack.
Like all good journos, sensationalism before facts. thumbup

Bangor isn't a sthole and NI, like the rest of the UK, isn't one big protection racket.
When I'm not reviewing cars I'm an insurance underwriter, the uk property arson and MD stats are quite compelling, you should review them.

Do a bit more research before you pass judgement old bean!

Zwolf

25,867 posts

208 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
POORCARDEALER said:
Car probably needed brake pads after a year, so he came on here, got advised to reject the car under SOGA, garage wouldnt play ball........
hehe



Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

184 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
crispyshark said:
When I'm not reviewing cars I'm an insurance underwriter, the uk property arson and MD stats are quite compelling, you should review them.

Do a bit more research before you pass judgement old bean!
I'm open to an education. If you have evidence that Bangor is particularly prone to acid attacks following non-payment of protection money, please, show me, I'll happily eat humble pie.

crispyshark

1,262 posts

147 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
crispyshark said:
When I'm not reviewing cars I'm an insurance underwriter, the uk property arson and MD stats are quite compelling, you should review them.

Do a bit more research before you pass judgement old bean!
I'm open to an education. If you have evidence that Bangor is particularly prone to acid attacks following non-payment of protection money, please, show me, I'll happily eat humble pie.
MD (malicious damage) can take many forms, not just an acid attack. I didn't say Bangor was particularly prone to acid attacks. Stats for MD, especially in Belfast and surrounding areas are not great.

So now let's look at the evidence from an invetagationary point of view. The attack was quick, targeted and the fact that a brush was used to rub the acid in shows this wasn't random, it was thought about.

Move this on a bit further, if you wanted to really show your anger (if your that way inclined), why not slash tyres, smash windows or in the extreme, torch the cars? By using the acid it makes it difficult for the garage to claim as I imagine their excess will be fairly large for stock in the open and apply to each car. This crime is designed to cause business interruption and max financial damage to the garage. Finally, it is a crime (criminal damage) that carries a lesser punishment than arson if the perpetrators were caught in the act.

The above is why I made my original comment backed up by my own experience as an underwriter and Geographical rating tools we use.

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

184 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
crispyshark said:
MD (malicious damage) can take many forms, not just an acid attack. I didn't say Bangor was particularly prone to acid attacks. Stats for MD, especially in Belfast and surrounding areas are not great.

So now let's look at the evidence from an invetagationary point of view. The attack was quick, targeted and the fact that a brush was used to rub the acid in shows this wasn't random, it was thought about.

Move this on a bit further, if you wanted to really show your anger (if your that way inclined), why not slash tyres, smash windows or in the extreme, torch the cars? By using the acid it makes it difficult for the garage to claim as I imagine their excess will be fairly large for stock in the open and apply to each car. This crime is designed to cause business interruption and max financial damage to the garage. Finally, it is a crime (criminal damage) that carries a lesser punishment than arson if the perpetrators were caught in the act.

The above is why I made my original comment backed up by my own experience as an underwriter and Geographical rating tools we use.
Again, I'm open to evidence. You said that given where this happened, it was likely to be the result of someone not paying their protection money. Show me some evidence that Bangor (or even NI as a whole) is a hotbed of this type of activity. Stats, documentary evidence, not the means with which the act was carried out.

dudleybloke

20,034 posts

188 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
i thought people got jailed for carrying knives these days.

Cliftonite

8,421 posts

140 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
dudleybloke said:
Cliftonite said:
i thought people got jailed for carrying knives these days.
This particular scrote had more mental problems than is usual, it appears.


Fer

7,714 posts

282 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Was there an Audi R8 there?

Zwolf

25,867 posts

208 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Fer said:
Was there an Audi R8 there?
hehe

Raize

1,476 posts

181 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
dudleybloke said:
Cliftonite said:
i thought people got jailed for carrying knives multi-tools these days.
Fixed.

Welshjohn

1,215 posts

183 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
This happens all over.the honda dealers by me. Had the tires slashed on at least 20+ brand new cars a few weeks back..

Kev T360

366 posts

153 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
some scum out there.

dacouch

1,172 posts

131 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
crispyshark said:
MD (malicious damage) can take many forms, not just an acid attack. I didn't say Bangor was particularly prone to acid attacks. Stats for MD, especially in Belfast and surrounding areas are not great.

So now let's look at the evidence from an invetagationary point of view. The attack was quick, targeted and the fact that a brush was used to rub the acid in shows this wasn't random, it was thought about.

Move this on a bit further, if you wanted to really show your anger (if your that way inclined), why not slash tyres, smash windows or in the extreme, torch the cars? By using the acid it makes it difficult for the garage to claim as I imagine their excess will be fairly large for stock in the open and apply to each car. This crime is designed to cause business interruption and max financial damage to the garage. Finally, it is a crime (criminal damage) that carries a lesser punishment than arson if the perpetrators were caught in the act.

The above is why I made my original comment backed up by my own experience as an underwriter and Geographical rating tools we use.
The excess would normally be circa £350 and the attack would be classed as one incident with the vast majority of motor trade policies only applying the excess once so a total excess to pay of circa £350 for a claim worth many £10ks.

The excess may well be increased at renewal or other terms applied perhaps applying any excess to each vehicle but that would be highly unusual unless the trader has a history of malicious damage claims and / or was situated in a very high crime area

crispyshark

1,262 posts

147 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
Papa Hotel said:
crispyshark said:
MD (malicious damage) can take many forms, not just an acid attack. I didn't say Bangor was particularly prone to acid attacks. Stats for MD, especially in Belfast and surrounding areas are not great.

So now let's look at the evidence from an invetagationary point of view. The attack was quick, targeted and the fact that a brush was used to rub the acid in shows this wasn't random, it was thought about.

Move this on a bit further, if you wanted to really show your anger (if your that way inclined), why not slash tyres, smash windows or in the extreme, torch the cars? By using the acid it makes it difficult for the garage to claim as I imagine their excess will be fairly large for stock in the open and apply to each car. This crime is designed to cause business interruption and max financial damage to the garage. Finally, it is a crime (criminal damage) that carries a lesser punishment than arson if the perpetrators were caught in the act.

The above is why I made my original comment backed up by my own experience as an underwriter and Geographical rating tools we use.
Again, I'm open to evidence. You said that given where this happened, it was likely to be the result of someone not paying their protection money. Show me some evidence that Bangor (or even NI as a whole) is a hotbed of this type of activity. Stats, documentary evidence, not the means with which the act was carried out.
http://www.psni.police.uk/monthly_asb_update_apr-dec_13_14.xls

Shows anti social behaviour up by 10% in Co Down. Appreciate this does not support my claims however I can not download the crime stats sheet to my iPad from psni, I want for specific crime stats. My original point and suspicions I have supported in my statement above and from what I have witnessed and read.

As we are only licensed by our capacity providers to use the geo tool in course of business, I can't give you or send you a print out of the findings of that area however I can tell you (whether you choose to believe it or not), that it views that area as a high crime and extreme arson area.

crispyshark

1,262 posts

147 months

Saturday 1st February 2014
quotequote all
dacouch said:
crispyshark said:
MD (malicious damage) can take many forms, not just an acid attack. I didn't say Bangor was particularly prone to acid attacks. Stats for MD, especially in Belfast and surrounding areas are not great.

So now let's look at the evidence from an invetagationary point of view. The attack was quick, targeted and the fact that a brush was used to rub the acid in shows this wasn't random, it was thought about.

Move this on a bit further, if you wanted to really show your anger (if your that way inclined), why not slash tyres, smash windows or in the extreme, torch the cars? By using the acid it makes it difficult for the garage to claim as I imagine their excess will be fairly large for stock in the open and apply to each car. This crime is designed to cause business interruption and max financial damage to the garage. Finally, it is a crime (criminal damage) that carries a lesser punishment than arson if the perpetrators were caught in the act.

The above is why I made my original comment backed up by my own experience as an underwriter and Geographical rating tools we use.
The excess would normally be circa £350 and the attack would be classed as one incident with the vast majority of motor trade policies only applying the excess once so a total excess to pay of circa £350 for a claim worth many £10ks.

The excess may well be increased at renewal or other terms applied perhaps applying any excess to each vehicle but that would be highly unusual unless the trader has a history of malicious damage claims and / or was situated in a very high crime area
Excess level at £350 seems cheap to me, but then I am coming from a property view point and we would apply an xs of at least £1k.