£2500 Fast Petrol Cars With Good MPG

£2500 Fast Petrol Cars With Good MPG

Author
Discussion

McSam

6,753 posts

177 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
I came in here thinking this would be an interesting thread, but in fact it should be titled "cheap hatchback that isn't ungodly slow".

Memorise97

Original Poster:

191 posts

115 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
McSam said:
I came in here thinking this would be an interesting thread, but in fact it should be titled "cheap hatchback that isn't ungodly slow".
Haha sorry, just looking for some ideas and people with experience of these hatches

itcaptainslow

3,726 posts

138 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
I'll add the K12 Micra SR160 to the list-owned one seven years ago when I was 19. Went reasonably well for a small warm hatchback, awesome MPG when driven without lead feet, handled well and was pretty entertaining to punt about. Insurable, too.

MG ZR160 is also worth a look, but I doubt it'll be so insurance friendly at your age.

ecsrobin

17,388 posts

167 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Memorise97 said:
2004 1.2 corsa energy
What about a 1.3 CDTI corsa that way you have a TURBO!!!!!!!!! All the girls will lift their skirts when they hear you mention that.

ferrariF50lover

1,834 posts

228 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
So, DSUK said:

dsuk said:
Instead of getting two cars, why don't you get one that isn't an embarassment to pistonheads
To which the OP replied:

Memorise97 said:
I have a £2500 budget including selling the corsa I have now
So, OP, your answer to having a limited budget is not to buy one £2500 car, but two £1250 cars, in the hope that, somehow, each of them is better?

Fast petrol cars don't have good MPG, that's how internal combustion engines work. More speed requires either less weight (and 2.5k won't get you a Lotus) or more power. To generate more power, more fuel is used. This has the predictable consequence of returning poorer economy.

That's if you want an actual fast car (something red and Italian, or German and M3 shaped). If you simply want something which feels fast to someone accustomed to a 1200cc Corsa, then, well, insert your own "my Nan's mobility scooter is probably up to the job" joke here.

Simon.

Dalto123

3,198 posts

165 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Why not wait another year, save a bit more and get a better insurance quotes when you've gained more no claims discount?

Baryonyx

18,034 posts

161 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
What about a 1.3 CDTI corsa that way you have a TURBO!!!!!!!!! All the girls will lift their skirts when they hear you mention that.
Don't worry, diesel spoiled that party for everyone! hehe

In all honesty though, I'm stuck with using some of those awful 1.3CDTi engined Astras at work. The worst engine and gearing I've ever come across. Absolutely dreadful.

ecsrobin

17,388 posts

167 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
ecsrobin said:
What about a 1.3 CDTI corsa that way you have a TURBO!!!!!!!!! All the girls will lift their skirts when they hear you mention that.
Don't worry, diesel spoiled that party for everyone! hehe

In all honesty though, I'm stuck with using some of those awful 1.3CDTi engined Astras at work. The worst engine and gearing I've ever come across. Absolutely dreadful.
16 year old girls won't know the difference.

I only picked it as it was the next engine size up from his present motor biggrin

JohneeBoy

503 posts

177 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
Are classic cars still reasonable to insure when young? I had a Spitfire when 18. Not fast by modern standards but a lot more fun.

Adam205

815 posts

184 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
ferrariF50lover said:
So, OP, your answer to having a limited budget is not to buy one £2500 car, but two £1250 cars, in the hope that, somehow, each of them is better?

Fast petrol cars don't have good MPG, that's how internal combustion engines work. More speed requires either less weight (and 2.5k won't get you a Lotus) or more power. To generate more power, more fuel is used. This has the predictable consequence of returning poorer economy.

That's if you want an actual fast car (something red and Italian, or German and M3 shaped). If you simply want something which feels fast to someone accustomed to a 1200cc Corsa, then, well, insert your own "my Nan's mobility scooter is probably up to the job" joke here.

Simon.
Second car... as in the one AFTER the first one.

Golaboots

369 posts

150 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
How about these?

Saab 9-3/900 turbo. Could sneak into classic insurance or be considered 'old man' enough to avoid the higher groups. Essentially avoiding cars that young people buy and crash is the aim here.

1.7 ford puma.

Mgf?


General Madness

365 posts

154 months

Monday 10th November 2014
quotequote all
How about a decent condition phase 2 clio 172. You can get them for £1500 and put the saving towards the insurance.

I get 30mpg around town and on a run at 65 I get 48-52 mpg. According to the dash. Not to shabby considering it is rarely driven in a sedate manner

ferrariF50lover

1,834 posts

228 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
Adam205 said:
Second car... as in the one AFTER the first one.
Ah, that'll teach me to trust DCUK!

My vote goes to the person who suggested keeping the Corsa for another year or two and then getting something actually fun, rather than going all out now for the most fun you can have with such restrictive conditions. A 1.9 Punto is no one's idea of a good time.

Delayed gratification; you can have a Punto now and do little more than bore yourself to death, or you can buy a warmish hatch and sponsor your insurer's new Porsche or, in 18 months time, you can take all the money you've saved, buy an old M3 and have some real fun.

Let us know what colour your inevitable Clio 172 is.

Simon.

otolith

56,853 posts

206 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
Golaboots said:
How about these?

Saab 9-3/900 turbo. Could sneak into classic insurance or be considered 'old man' enough to avoid the higher groups. Essentially avoiding cars that young people buy and crash is the aim here.
I don't know what the situation is now, because while I insure a 9-5 Aero for peanuts, I am in my forties, but quick Saabs and young drivers used to be a bad combination insurance-wise.

JackP1

1,270 posts

164 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
Just reading on your other threads, is this going to be your second car, or a second car alongside the one you have?

ZS's are good cars, some car reviews put the handling down as better than the ST but frankly its bullst.
I've owned my ST for 5 years and i'll give you a few stats.
-£220 a year tax
-£40 MOT ( yet to fail, touchwood)
servicing is about £40 for parts if you do it yourself ( C service every 3 years i think is £89 in parts)
-Insurance when i was 20 and 2 years ncb was £1400. Its now at about £500 with 6yrs NCB with all modifications declared ( don't ask me how many, maybe 7/8 ) through a specialist broker. You'll have to be 21 to be with a majority of specialist brokers for insurance.
-Currently 32MPG. A tank can range from about 220 miles to 300+ depending on your driving style.
-I run Toyo T1-R's ( you can't get them anymore but they have a newer model out ) generally good quality tyres are £75 a corner.
-Disks and pads set me back £140. They're from Pagid and i rate them pretty well for the price.
-They can be picked up for next to nothing these days, i don't want to sell mine for this reason as they've dropped that much i'd rather just keep it for the foreseeable future.
-Mines been relatively hassle free, i've spent money on it because i love it and it happily runs 180bhp and hasn't cost massive amounts to get it there.

Just be wary that your insurance is going to be ruinous regardless of how slow/small engine size car you get, so choose wisely on what you actually want then think if its worth spending the money on insurance or putting it towards something better later on in life.
A standard boring answer, but i sort of did the same.

HTH

Memorise97

Original Poster:

191 posts

115 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
JackP1 said:
Just reading on your other threads, is this going to be your second car, or a second car alongside the one you have?

ZS's are good cars, some car reviews put the handling down as better than the ST but frankly its bullst.
I've owned my ST for 5 years and i'll give you a few stats.
-£220 a year tax
-£40 MOT ( yet to fail, touchwood)
servicing is about £40 for parts if you do it yourself ( C service every 3 years i think is £89 in parts)
-Insurance when i was 20 and 2 years ncb was £1400. Its now at about £500 with 6yrs NCB with all modifications declared ( don't ask me how many, maybe 7/8 ) through a specialist broker. You'll have to be 21 to be with a majority of specialist brokers for insurance.
-Currently 32MPG. A tank can range from about 220 miles to 300+ depending on your driving style.
-I run Toyo T1-R's ( you can't get them anymore but they have a newer model out ) generally good quality tyres are £75 a corner.
-Disks and pads set me back £140. They're from Pagid and i rate them pretty well for the price.
-They can be picked up for next to nothing these days, i don't want to sell mine for this reason as they've dropped that much i'd rather just keep it for the foreseeable future.
-Mines been relatively hassle free, i've spent money on it because i love it and it happily runs 180bhp and hasn't cost massive amounts to get it there.

Just be wary that your insurance is going to be ruinous regardless of how slow/small engine size car you get, so choose wisely on what you actually want then think if its worth spending the money on insurance or putting it towards something better later on in life.
A standard boring answer, but i sort of did the same.

HTH
no, my second car, i will be selling the corsa
but yes i will be going for the Zetec S considering I will be 18, got quoted £1300 straight away without searching around which isn't too bad

Poopipe

619 posts

146 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
General Madness said:
How about a decent condition phase 2 clio 172. You can get them for £1500 and put the saving towards the insurance.

I get 30mpg around town and on a run at 65 I get 48-52 mpg. According to the dash. Not to shabby considering it is rarely driven in a sedate manner
Not a chance in hell of insuring one at 18 - i was paying nearly 600 on one at 29 with 1 year ncb ( got my license at 27) good postcode for insurance as well so it wasnt cos of that.

menor95

190 posts

128 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
Have you thought about an MX5 or MR2 (MK3). Way more fun and better to drive then any of the cars you are currently considering plus the two I suggested are real two seater sports cars. Not sure about insuring them at your age but you should give it a go.

Menor

coolchris

933 posts

204 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
I know its not petrol but how about a mk1 fabia 1.9 tdi vrs.Insurance group 9 50 mpg very good little car with a strong reliable engine and well screwed together failing that a cheap saxo vtr

Baryonyx

18,034 posts

161 months

Tuesday 11th November 2014
quotequote all
Golaboots said:
How about these?

Saab 9-3/900 turbo. Could sneak into classic insurance or be considered 'old man' enough to avoid the higher groups. Essentially avoiding cars that young people buy and crash is the aim here.

1.7 ford puma.

Mgf?
I expect the Aero/HOT models will command far too strong an insurance premium for most young drivers.