RE: Range Rover Velar: Review

RE: Range Rover Velar: Review

Author
Discussion

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Stick Legs said:
Ares said:
Evoque is small. As my dad calls them, a girls 4x4.

RRS and FFRR are big and proper full size SUVs (in the UK).

This is a good fit between the two.
1) It's fking hideous.
2) They make a Discovery & a Discovery Sport which are 'a good fit between the two'.
3) As it's now obviously school holiday's you can tell your Dad that he's right. And add that this is a bell end's 4x4.

smile
1) In your opinion. I think the opposite. Reviewers tend to agree with me more than you.
2) The Discos are the 'cheap' option, I've you've ever been in them compared to a RR you'll notice a HUGE difference.
3) My dad is 74yrs old. Not sure where the school reference comes from, but your assertion of this being a 'bell-end's 4x4' suggests you are closer to school age than me.

HorneyMX5

5,311 posts

151 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Stick Legs said:

2) They make a Discovery & a Discovery Sport which are 'a good fit between the two'.
The Disco and Disco Sport are Land Rovers not Range Rovers. JLR are building a two tiered product range. Small, medium and big luxury with RR. Small, medium and big practical and tough with LR.

SFO

5,169 posts

184 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
very expensive even with not too many options

cheapest I could spec a D240 was £60k!

JohnoVR6

690 posts

213 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Ares said:
In the flesh it's stunning. Best looking SUV by a mile.
Saw it up close at Goodwood a few times. Really wanted to like it, but I can't say I'm a fan of the exterior at all.

richthebike

1,734 posts

138 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
HorneyMX5 said:
Stick Legs said:

2) They make a Discovery & a Discovery Sport which are 'a good fit between the two'.
The Disco and Disco Sport are Land Rovers not Range Rovers. JLR are building a two tiered product range. Small, medium and big luxury with RR. Small, medium and big practical and tough with LR.
Erm, there are 4 in the Range Rover range so that more like small, medium, large, extra large!

Personally, their range hierarchy doesn't bother me, and I don't struggle with them offering to fill obvious niches. More choice is good.

The use of the term 'white space' however, is not good.

Greg_D

6,542 posts

247 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
richthebike said:
RammyMP said:
richthebike said:
I'm two years into Range Rover ownership. Fantastic product, when it isn't breaking down, let down even further by the worst dealership experience I have ever known.

Even if this won every road test in every magazine I'd not buy it, and I'd be first to tell people who ask my opinion to avoid the brand on the whole.

Looking to switch out of my FFRR asap and have asked the network to buy it back.
Snap. We've had a number of Discovery Sports when the Evoque has been in to get fixed and I get that they need an intermediate luxury model as the Disco Sport feels very cheap.

Unfortunately there is no way that LR will get any more money out of me until they build a reliable car and their dealers provide a service better then fking piss poor!
Good to hear it's not just me on the wrong end of their woeful service (sorry to wish it on you, but hopefully you know what I mean).

The FFRR is a brilliant, brilliant product, when it works. But when it doesn't you're in the hands of their service division / warranty department and it is unbearable.

I won't write the details here because we're in a bit of a dispute, but I cannot emphasise enough how much I'd advise everyone in the PH community not to get drawn in by the lovely product, and think very carefully about whether you can live with the associated frustrations.
and for balance, i have had absolutely no problem with my FFRR at all, a paragon of reliability (actually, tell a lie, one of the brake pads was squeaking and the local dealer sent a bloke round to my place of work, left a loan car, took it away, fixed it under warrantee and returned clean the same day.)

You take as you find... the people at my local dealership are first rate

T1berious

2,272 posts

156 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
No. No. and No.

After reading the Autocar review ("hmmm, something not quite right...") I can't help but feel that the not quite right is the platform (nowt wrong with platform sharing etc when sharing with like vehicles) making a Rangie from an XE / XF Platform has to be a bad place to start right?

Yes, it's more road focused with enough options available to make it a creditable off roader and this is where IMHO the plot is lost.

A RRS starts at 60k, go decent Diesel HSE and you might see change out of 75k (I like that car it has real presence )

Enter the Velar stage left and with a V6 it's easy to nudge into RRS money.

It's a gap that didn't need to be filed and it's badge engineering. F-Pace, Discovery, Discovery Sport were happily doing fine work in that gap.

I'm sure it will sell loads but a Range Rover on a purely road based platform seems wrong.

T1b

DeolTheBeast

449 posts

147 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Ares said:
Stick Legs said:
Ares said:
Evoque is small. As my dad calls them, a girls 4x4.

RRS and FFRR are big and proper full size SUVs (in the UK).

This is a good fit between the two.
1) It's fking hideous.
2) They make a Discovery & a Discovery Sport which are 'a good fit between the two'.
3) As it's now obviously school holiday's you can tell your Dad that he's right. And add that this is a bell end's 4x4.

smile
1) In your opinion. I think the opposite. Reviewers tend to agree with me more than you.
2) The Discos are the 'cheap' option, I've you've ever been in them compared to a RR you'll notice a HUGE difference.
3) My dad is 74yrs old. Not sure where the school reference comes from, but your assertion of this being a 'bell-end's 4x4' suggests you are closer to school age than me.
Point 2 is massively wrong, RR and the top spec new full fat Disco are literally the same in terms of quality.

The Disco Sport is where you see a quality difference (as with the Evoque).

Pintofbest

806 posts

111 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
SFO said:
very expensive even with not too many options

cheapest I could spec a D240 was £60k!
The cheapest D240 is the S trim which is £54k? confused

urquattroGus

1,862 posts

191 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Cynical, fashionable for 5 minutes yuppie mobile.

Sure that it will sell well though!

richthebike

1,734 posts

138 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Greg_D said:
richthebike said:
RammyMP said:
richthebike said:
I'm two years into Range Rover ownership. Fantastic product, when it isn't breaking down, let down even further by the worst dealership experience I have ever known.

Even if this won every road test in every magazine I'd not buy it, and I'd be first to tell people who ask my opinion to avoid the brand on the whole.

Looking to switch out of my FFRR asap and have asked the network to buy it back.
Snap. We've had a number of Discovery Sports when the Evoque has been in to get fixed and I get that they need an intermediate luxury model as the Disco Sport feels very cheap.

Unfortunately there is no way that LR will get any more money out of me until they build a reliable car and their dealers provide a service better then fking piss poor!
Good to hear it's not just me on the wrong end of their woeful service (sorry to wish it on you, but hopefully you know what I mean).

The FFRR is a brilliant, brilliant product, when it works. But when it doesn't you're in the hands of their service division / warranty department and it is unbearable.

I won't write the details here because we're in a bit of a dispute, but I cannot emphasise enough how much I'd advise everyone in the PH community not to get drawn in by the lovely product, and think very carefully about whether you can live with the associated frustrations.
and for balance, i have had absolutely no problem with my FFRR at all, a paragon of reliability (actually, tell a lie, one of the brake pads was squeaking and the local dealer sent a bloke round to my place of work, left a loan car, took it away, fixed it under warrantee and returned clean the same day.)

You take as you find... the people at my local dealership are first rate
It's helpful to have the balance, but even more frustrating that there are such dealer inconsistencies. I'm not allowed to dealer identify here, but I'm glad there are good ones. Maybe you should call them out for praise - that can't be against the rules?

The reliability issues haven't been trivial. It left me stranded in traffic in the outside lane of the M6 for 5 minutes when the gearbox decided it needed a word with itself or a rest or something. This is the 8 speed ZF / 4.4 TDV8 powertrain.

Anyway, I'm hoping to get a peaceful resolution soon without resorting to anything drastic.

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
T1berious said:
It's a gap that didn't need to be filed and it's badge engineering. F-Pace, Discovery, Discovery Sport were happily doing fine work in that gap.

I'm sure it will sell loads but a Range Rover on a purely road based platform seems wrong.

T1b
You've just proved yourself wrong. JLR are there to sell cars. Ergo, if a new model sells loads, it's a niche that works.

Ares

11,000 posts

121 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
DeolTheBeast said:
Ares said:
Stick Legs said:
Ares said:
Evoque is small. As my dad calls them, a girls 4x4.

RRS and FFRR are big and proper full size SUVs (in the UK).

This is a good fit between the two.
1) It's fking hideous.
2) They make a Discovery & a Discovery Sport which are 'a good fit between the two'.
3) As it's now obviously school holiday's you can tell your Dad that he's right. And add that this is a bell end's 4x4.

smile
1) In your opinion. I think the opposite. Reviewers tend to agree with me more than you.
2) The Discos are the 'cheap' option, I've you've ever been in them compared to a RR you'll notice a HUGE difference.
3) My dad is 74yrs old. Not sure where the school reference comes from, but your assertion of this being a 'bell-end's 4x4' suggests you are closer to school age than me.
Point 2 is massively wrong, RR and the top spec new full fat Disco are literally the same in terms of quality.

The Disco Sport is where you see a quality difference (as with the Evoque).
Not sure what RRs you've been in, but the Disco, whilst a step up from the Disco sport, is still a league behind the RR. Three of the parents at my daughter's school have swapped 3-4yr old RR for brand new Discos, all have regretted it and two have already swapped back.

Pesty

42,655 posts

257 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Fabulous looking thing.

jakeb

281 posts

195 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Rear seats in new ff disco are awful if your an adult. It is like the back was made only for children

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Well done to rang rover for selling loads of cars, but they really could make any car and people would line up, the age of the SUV.

I look at it and think what is the point, but i don't have more money than sense.

dtrump

2,121 posts

192 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
They spotted a gap in the line up and made a great looking car thumbup

If you think it looks like all the others...you need to open your eyes a little further...and maybe a slap biggrin

bitwrx

1,352 posts

205 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
No mention in the article that to open the door, you first have to press a button on the door handle so that the handle opens, so you can then pull the handle to open the door.

Seems a little unnecessary to me...

hyphen

26,262 posts

91 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
Ares said:
Stick Legs said:
I struggle to see the point when the RRS & Evoque exist.

More troubling is the wholesale debasement of everything that made JLR special vehicles in the first place.

Range Rover, Discovery & Land Rover was a long time ago now but they are still trading on that image & heritage.

I can see the whole JLR project collapsing a'la Rover once the current product lines are swelling the classifieds and the 'specialness' has gone.

Shame.
Evoque is small. As my dad calls them, a girls 4x4.

RRS and FFRR are big and proper full size SUVs (in the UK).

This is a good fit between the two.
Purely my perception from a more sales perspective at JLR

Evoque - everyman's lease car, any full time job working person can and does sign up, in white.
Velar- lease car for the team managers who earn a bit more and don't want same as the workers
Rrs - less lifestyle product now, may even be bought in cash.
Ffrr - person wafting along.

AndrewNR

270 posts

123 months

Monday 24th July 2017
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
Ares said:
p1stonhead said:
+1 look how bloody similar all of these look!

Brand following similar design cue shocker?


No-one else does that. Except BMW, Audi, Merc, Lexus, Porsche, Jaguar,.....
How many companies have 6 very similar looking SUV's (or any single type of vehicle) and nothing else?
Why do BMW bother with the 3 and 7 series when the 5 is adequate enough? All your saving/paying for is a bit less/more room etc. Same here with the Evoque > Velar > RRS > FFRR

As mentioned the RR range is the "posh" range and LR is the "common" range, so they only really make 4 of any one type.