RE: The Brave Pill: Jaguar S-Type R

RE: The Brave Pill: Jaguar S-Type R

Author
Discussion

Zumbruk

7,848 posts

261 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
MX5Biologist said:
There's a link to that in the article.

big_rob_sydney

3,412 posts

195 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Is this based on a Mondeo...?

Octane99

2 posts

62 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Is this based on a Mondeo...?
No, platforn was developed for Lincoln LS(? - well one of them anyway), Ford Thunderbird, and Jaguar S-Type. It was potentially going to be used in one of the concept F-Type during it's time.

legless

1,695 posts

141 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Octane99 said:
big_rob_sydney said:
Is this based on a Mondeo...?
No, platforn was developed for Lincoln LS(? - well one of them anyway), Ford Thunderbird, and Jaguar S-Type. It was potentially going to be used in one of the concept F-Type during it's time.
The S197 Mustang uses a cost-reduced version of the same platform too. It's essentially the same floorpan, but with a lower-cost suspension setup.

Diderot

7,378 posts

193 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Loved mine (a 52 plate) in 2006 from the inside (outside obvs issues). Super comfortable and rapid. Deffo have on again as a snotter.

Etypephil

724 posts

79 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Gameface said:
191mph my arse.
Jaguar are historically more conservative than most with their power and performance claims.

As far back as 1948 they claimed that their XK 120 could achieve, unsurprisingly, 120 mph. When called out by the press and the "exotic" manufacturers, they showed that it would actually do 134 mph.

Mr Tidy

22,616 posts

128 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Etypephil said:
Jaguar are historically more conservative than most with their power and performance claims.

As far back as 1948 they claimed that their XK 120 could achieve, unsurprisingly, 120 mph. When called out by the press and the "exotic" manufacturers, they showed that it would actually do 134 mph.
They may have been in the 1940s, but I'm sure I read somewhere that the E-Type that managed 150 mph had a higher compression engine than standard fitted and 3 carbs instead of 2! laugh

Anyway that S-Type R looks great.

For some reason I've liked them ever since I first saw one - maybe I should try one some time!

1430

81 posts

118 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Etypephil said:
Jaguar are historically more conservative than most with their power and performance claims.

As far back as 1948 they claimed that their XK 120 could achieve, unsurprisingly, 120 mph. When called out by the press and the "exotic" manufacturers, they showed that it would actually do 134 mph.
Do you really believe they would undersell their cars, or is it more likely they used a race spec engine for the press car.

Etypephil

724 posts

79 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
They may have been in the 1940s, but I'm sure I read somewhere that the E-Type that managed 150 mph had a higher compression engine than standard fitted and 3 carbs instead of 2! laugh

Anyway that S-Type R looks great.

For some reason I've liked them ever since I first saw one - maybe I should try one some time!
All early E-Types had 9;1 compression engines and 3 SU HD8 carbs; later US spec ones had 8:1 compression pistons fitted and 2 Stromberg carbs.

I didn't read that, I owned and drove them; 150 mph was a walk in the park for them, if a little light on the front.:-)


Edited by Etypephil on Saturday 2nd March 22:48

GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
If I remember correctly ...my Observer's Book of Automobiles (1966 Edition) had the E-Type down as reaching 152 MPH smile

r44flyer

462 posts

217 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
I've had an S-Type R for 3 years now, in the same black. Absolutely love it. A fantastic performance barge. I can waft along for good distances and feel fresh as a daisy at the other end, or have fun with it instead. It's not the quickest off the line and corners aren't its forte, as it's a heavy car, but the acceleration once rolling is amazing.

It throws the odd bill, which is to be expected, but nothing ruinous. The areas to look into mentioned in the article should be taken seriously, particularly the rust. I've had the sills replaced for example, a job which has seen many sent to the scrapyard.

Sadly, its days in my ownership are now numbered as I use it to commute to Birmingham City Centre and the introduction of the clean air zone means it'll cost me an anticipated £6 per day to drive in.

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
The only problem when considering a S Type R is that a XJR of a similar vintage has the same engine and gearbox, better styling, more toys and yet manages to weigh less than the S type.

MrBarry123

6,030 posts

122 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
I can confirm they are just a little faster than a Scirocco R.

ETA: Launch control was not enabled and it was a cold day on Cup 2s.

Edited by MrBarry123 on Saturday 2nd March 23:32

pwd95

8,385 posts

239 months

Saturday 2nd March 2019
quotequote all
GranCab said:
I couldn't stand the whining supercharger noise every time it accelerated.
Do you belong on PISTON HEADS... confused

Garystewartdms

13 posts

79 months

Sunday 3rd March 2019
quotequote all
Another great read, been tempted on both cars so far, keep this rolling please - at some point it will lead me to financial ruin, but with something interesting on the drive, or in the menders!

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

262 months

Sunday 3rd March 2019
quotequote all
1430 said:
Etypephil said:
Jaguar are historically more conservative than most with their power and performance claims.

As far back as 1948 they claimed that their XK 120 could achieve, unsurprisingly, 120 mph. When called out by the press and the "exotic" manufacturers, they showed that it would actually do 134 mph.
Do you really believe they would undersell their cars, or is it more likely they used a race spec engine for the press car.
Not unusual. Didn't Skoda fit a 225hp engine in its '170hp ' VRS Octavia presser?

And TVR definitely fiddled with that infamous drag race Cerbera which Clarkson drove.

gapthree

8 posts

162 months

Sunday 3rd March 2019
quotequote all
Last year I picked up a 110k Gold/moss covered 1999 S type languishing by the the roadside for £500 to smoke around in. Only a 3litre but attacted to the manual it gave 33mpg & when the box was stirred it went like Morse on speed! After new rubber, service, coil packs & shock bushes & a good scrub it came up mint. Whisper quiet over 70 fab ride/handle combo, vpractival. Gave me 12k without a further penny spent in 4months & sold for £1500. The point is there inherently good cars to live with. I think the brave pill is only for consumables if you use it a lot. I’ve taken the pill & owed a 2001 S8 for 10yrs &100k @23mpg now showing 240k. If it grenaded the S ‘R’ would be a worthy consideration imho.

syl

693 posts

76 months

Sunday 3rd March 2019
quotequote all
I had one, 56 plate. Liked the performance, much less the mpg (13.9 was my usual average). I traded it in at 100k miles and around 9 years old for nearer half that that is being asked for in the article, but it did have some minor niggles and was due a service. It needed little major maintenance in my 6 years of ownership and there are plenty of independents around to deal with it, though part prices are never cheap. The spark plugs are due at 100k, not 30k, and the gearbox is “sealed for life” - though a change at 60-75k is probably appropriate.

florian

291 posts

275 months

Sunday 3rd March 2019
quotequote all
A good looking interior (facelift model) as well as a nice body color and trim. But as mentioned before, why would anyone chose an S-Type R over an XJR nowadays? Surely they are in the same used car price bracket. Maybe you could even get a decent XK8 for that money ...

GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Sunday 3rd March 2019
quotequote all
pwd95 said:
GranCab said:
I couldn't stand the whining supercharger noise every time it accelerated.
Do you belong on PISTON HEADS... confused
Or whining people ....