RE: VW ID.R breaks outright Goodwood record
Discussion
Not sure but power to weight circa 1400bhp per ton with good aero, right gearing, right suspension, grippy tyres its gonna be there. Poss sub 40 secs? No doubt electric stuff is the future but just saying it's a shame this thing has been allowed to have a go when hillclimbers haven't been. They'd be great to watch and hear but unfortunately the future is EV quiet...
Max_Torque said:
Edmundo2 said:
Or a current British Hillclimb front runner - using a petrol engine and costing less than £100k...
Whats the downforce to mass ratio on a top UK hill climber, and the power to weight? The IDR gets off the line like, well, one of those radio controlled cars you used to drive as a kid! 130R said:
tr3a said:
EV's are just superior cars.
At least until a dinosaur powered LMP1 or F1 car bothers to turn up and wipes the floor with ittr3a said:
How delightfully predictable.
EV's are just superior cars. The only things they don't do well is make brmm-brmm noises, burn chemicals inefficiently and poison us.
What a ridiculous comment. You’ve obviously chosen to ignore:EV's are just superior cars. The only things they don't do well is make brmm-brmm noises, burn chemicals inefficiently and poison us.
1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
85Carrera said:
What a ridiculous comment. You’ve obviously chosen to ignore:
1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
Daily mail reader?1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
I can’t help but think that electric cars won’t actually take off until there is a solution to how to power the motors without big, expensive, restrictive batteries.
We need fuel cells.
Im sold on electric motors and I don’t really think anyone would miss an ICE if they could have a reasonably light, awd, electric car that they could refil in 2 minutes.
Heavy battery powered things? Not convinced and judging by recent sales data I’m not alone.
We need fuel cells.
Im sold on electric motors and I don’t really think anyone would miss an ICE if they could have a reasonably light, awd, electric car that they could refil in 2 minutes.
Heavy battery powered things? Not convinced and judging by recent sales data I’m not alone.
stevemcs said:
How about letting the 919 Evo have a crack
Porsche apparently were offered a shot at it and said no. paulw123 said:
So why is this safe to go for the record but a F1 car not?
When you look at the F1 car run vs the EV run the F1 car is on the limit and for most of the run looking like it’s about to the leave the tarmac. I assume that’s why. However with the resurfaced hill and modern F1 cars and tyre technology it shouldn’t not be allowed.
modeller said:
85Carrera said:
What a ridiculous comment. You’ve obviously chosen to ignore:
1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
Daily mail reader?1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
For what it’s worth, most of my cars are old, “polluting”, worth a fraction of, for example, a Tesla but are, I would argue, more environmentally sound.
I was at the FoS yesterday and the speed of this car was very impressive, albeit it sounded like a Hoover, but one good run (fixed, it appears, if other posters are to be believed about removing batteries and the like) does not resolve the issues with electric cars. Or ignore the fact that wholesale switching to electric cars as ill-informed idiots like you seem to want, is far worse for the environment than continuing to use (rather than scrap) older ICE cars. And that’s before you consider the batteries, which are hardly environmentally friendly either to make or scrap (which would be well before the end of life of an ICE car). Instead of your rather immature “Daily Mail” jibe, perhaps you’d care to address those very real issues - if you have the knowledge to do so, which I doubt.
85Carrera said:
What a ridiculous comment. You’ve obviously chosen to ignore:
1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
I always wonder about this argument... It's like petrol and diesel are just found with zero energy requirements, no exploration, drilling, mining, shipping, refining and distribution with all it's own associated costs, specialist equipment, rigs and energy requirements. 1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
I wonder, if anyone has done a neutral like for like on the two, end to end per mile travelled energy cost...
RemarkLima said:
85Carrera said:
What a ridiculous comment. You’ve obviously chosen to ignore:
1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
I always wonder about this argument... It's like petrol and diesel are just found with zero energy requirements, no exploration, drilling, mining, shipping, refining and distribution with all it's own associated costs, specialist equipment, rigs and energy requirements. 1. The environmental consequences of mining the crap that goes in the batteries;
2. How the electricity they use has been produced; and
3. The environmental consequences of disposing of the crap in the batteries when they need replacing after less than 15 years.
And that’s ignoring the range issues which make them only suitable for a second/city car for most people ...
I wonder, if anyone has done a neutral like for like on the two, end to end per mile travelled energy cost...
borat52 said:
I can’t help but think that electric cars won’t actually take off until there is a solution to how to power the motors without big, expensive, restrictive batteries.
We need fuel cells.
Im sold on electric motors and I don’t really think anyone would miss an ICE if they could have a reasonably light, awd, electric car that they could refil in 2 minutes.
Heavy battery powered things? Not convinced and judging by recent sales data I’m not alone.
We dont need fuel cells. Fuel cell cars are as heavy as their EV equivalent and not likely to get lighter, and cost twice as much.We need fuel cells.
Im sold on electric motors and I don’t really think anyone would miss an ICE if they could have a reasonably light, awd, electric car that they could refil in 2 minutes.
Heavy battery powered things? Not convinced and judging by recent sales data I’m not alone.
BEVs are going to get rapidly cheaper and lighter. Its very easy to predict/track the change in energy density and reduction of costs.
tr3a said:
How delightfully predictable.
EV's are just superior cars. The only things they don't do well is make brmm-brmm noises, burn chemicals inefficiently and poison us.
And how do I get to Cornwall from Kent? Batteries are not the future, they are dinosaurs just like the combustion engine. Necessity is the mother of invention, we will find something else. Be it hydrogen or another synthetic element, or something nobody has conceived yet. EV's are just superior cars. The only things they don't do well is make brmm-brmm noises, burn chemicals inefficiently and poison us.
Speed Badger said:
And how do I get to Cornwall from Kent? Batteries are not the future, they are dinosaurs just like the combustion engine. Necessity is the mother of invention, we will find something else. Be it hydrogen or another synthetic element, or something nobody has conceived yet.
With this? I assume in the pit van with everyone else? Speed Badger said:
tr3a said:
How delightfully predictable.
EV's are just superior cars. The only things they don't do well is make brmm-brmm noises, burn chemicals inefficiently and poison us.
And how do I get to Cornwall from Kent? Batteries are not the future, they are dinosaurs just like the combustion engine. Necessity is the mother of invention, we will find something else. Be it hydrogen or another synthetic element, or something nobody has conceived yet. EV's are just superior cars. The only things they don't do well is make brmm-brmm noises, burn chemicals inefficiently and poison us.
Penzance to Dover is 354 miles so it would be manageable.
The major issue with EV in my opinion is the charging infrastructure and the issue of running cables all over the shop for folks that live in terraced streets or with communal parking.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff