What mpg is classed pricey???

What mpg is classed pricey???

Author
Discussion

Engineer1

10,486 posts

211 months

Sunday 9th January 2011
quotequote all
But day to day depreciation is academic I may well be loosing £5 a day on my car but that is £5 a day of the cash I have already spent that isn't coming back to me.

AlpineWhite

2,147 posts

197 months

Sunday 9th January 2011
quotequote all
Engineer1 said:
But day to day depreciation is academic I may well be loosing £5 a day on my car but that is £5 a day of the cash I have already spent that isn't coming back to me.
Agreed, mostly. When I was last deciding what car to go for, I added together all the costs involved in running the cars I fancied over the length of time I was planning to keep them. This included the purchase cost. I then subtracted the likely value of the car at the end of the chosen period (well, an educated guess). For me it was better to spend a bit more and get a newer diesel, even taking extra depreciation (its got more to lose) into account over older, cheaper petrols.

DannyVTS

7,543 posts

170 months

Sunday 9th January 2011
quotequote all
has anyone said smiles per gallon > miles per gallon yet?

Engineer1

10,486 posts

211 months

Sunday 9th January 2011
quotequote all
Realisticley pricey is when you resent the money you are spending on a journey.

swamp

994 posts

191 months

Sunday 9th January 2011
quotequote all
I'd say that 35mpg is probably the minimum boundary right now for petrol. VAG 2.0 TFSI now can achieve 38+mpg, BMW *30i can achieve similar with a 6 pot naturally aspirated engine, and Mercedes have recently announced 40mpg for their six cylinder petrol on their face lift C class estate.

For diesel I'd say 50mpg should be the expected norm. If BMW can get 50.4mpg from the new X3 with 8.2s 0-62mph, then most 'normal' diesel cars should equal or do better than this.

Edited by swamp on Sunday 9th January 23:01

Matt UK

17,787 posts

202 months

Sunday 9th January 2011
quotequote all
rsv gone! said:
Engineer1 said:
Matt UK said:
Remember that mpg is only part of the group of expenses involved in running a car.

Sometimes, mpg is not even the biggest cost...
I can stretch a service interval, I can't move a destination closer so it depends on if you are prepared to be a little hard on your car and miss a service.
So mpg is the least easy to adjust.
But on anything more valuable than a shed, depreciation is usually the biggest cost. It is often not worth changing to that newer, more expensive diesel when you factor depreciation in.
^^^ The point I was making

shuvitupya

3,224 posts

219 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
A Corsa will only give you 31MPG if you drive it the same way as an E46.

Just as a diesel will only get you 50MPG if you don't exceed the speed limits, and it's a 1.6HDi.


2 Wycked

2,335 posts

233 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
shuvitupya said:
Just as a diesel will only get you 50MPG if you don't exceed the speed limits, and it's a 1.6HDi.
Except that that's not true. My Vento TDI consistently averaged 59mpg and I did not drive it with achieving decent fuel economy in mind; on the one tank of fuel that I did it achieved an average of 63mpg.

rsv gone!

11,288 posts

243 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Matt UK said:
rsv gone! said:
Engineer1 said:
Matt UK said:
Remember that mpg is only part of the group of expenses involved in running a car.

Sometimes, mpg is not even the biggest cost...
I can stretch a service interval, I can't move a destination closer so it depends on if you are prepared to be a little hard on your car and miss a service.
So mpg is the least easy to adjust.
But on anything more valuable than a shed, depreciation is usually the biggest cost. It is often not worth changing to that newer, more expensive diesel when you factor depreciation in.
^^^ The point I was making
I realised that. smile

jbi

12,682 posts

206 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
it doesn't matter what you drive these days... it's all pricey

running a 1 litre sh!tbox costs the same as running a v8 a few years ago

Edited by jbi on Monday 10th January 07:37

1bhp

156 posts

178 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
i can get 25mpg around town in my 2.3 turbo hot aero saab, my wifes 1.8 zetec gets around 28-29 i would notice praticly no diffrence in cost if i was to use the zetec!

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

248 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
It's virtually impossible to save money by buying a new car.

  • Say 10,000 miles a year at 31 mpg = 322 gallons of petrol at £5.80 a gallon. £1,850 fuel bill.
If you buy an ultra-economy car you might eek out 62 mpg

  • Say 10,000 miles a year at 62 mpg = 161 gallons of petrol at £5.80 a gallon. £925 fuel bill.
Whether you look at the £925 saving for 1,2 or 3 years it's hard to justify selling a car you know (and like) and taking a mechanical chance on a "new" one (which you almost certainly won't like).

R26Andy

404 posts

163 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
Its all about perspective as well as affordability,

Coming from a Rx8 which done 17MPG to a z4c which does 27MPG I feel like a tree hugging hypermiler now lol.

anonymous-user

56 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
My e46 323 gets 31mpg on the motorway... thats cheap for me.

Around town I get around 20mpg... that I consider pricey

Garett

1,626 posts

194 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
I find this quite useful for weighing up the costs of running my car, but you can only really guess at what a new car will cost in terms of servicing and maintencane, so its an estimation really.

Even so if I change my current Saab 9K to a VW Passat TeDIous, I'll be saving ~£1300 a year which is quite a significant amount to me.

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/cost-of-your-car-calc...

Oh and in answer to your original question OP, to me about 30 MPG is where I think anything lower is bad, higher is fair to good.

Edited by Garett on Tuesday 11th January 14:54

Guvernator

13,210 posts

167 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
Anything under 17-18mpg I would consider to be quite thirsty. None of the cars I have owned has really done over 25mpg though. If I ever owned a car which did 30mpg plus and still gave me the performance I desired, I think I'd be pretty chuffed.

waterwonder

995 posts

178 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
IMO broadly speaking:

50mpg+ = Very economical
40-50MPG = Normal for a diesel
30-40MPG = Normal for a Petrol
20-30MPG = Entry level sports car, Hot hatch, S2000 350Z that kind of thing.
10-20MPG = Serious performance car. M5, Porsche, etc etc.
0-10MPG = V8 in the QE2 or V12 Jag XJS - serious gas guzzler.

So is suppose what you consider pricey is entirely dependant on your perspective. I would imagine most PHer cars or cars they aspire to are in the 0-30 range. So whilst Joe Bloggs, money saving expert extraordinaire might think anything worse than 40mpg is pricey, many on here would disagree.

Coming to end of a period in a Focus ST my comfort zone is 25-30mpg range.




T180985

133 posts

170 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
mp3manager said:
1bhp said:
i can get 25mpg around town in my 2.3 turbo hot aero saab, my wifes 1.8 zetec gets around 28-29 i would notice praticly no diffrence in cost if i was to use the zetec!
Educate me....how does one 'use the zetec!'
You get out of the Saab and into the ford?

mp3manager

4,254 posts

198 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
Ahh...I thought it was like using the force.


  • Damn posting got screwed up somewhere. frown

Bhuvsta

234 posts

164 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
mp3manager said:
1bhp said:
i can get 25mpg around town in my 2.3 turbo hot aero saab, my wifes 1.8 zetec gets around 28-29 i would notice praticly no diffrence in cost if i was to use the zetec!
Educate me....how does one 'use the zetec!'
Upside down ofcourse!

Edited by Bhuvsta on Tuesday 11th January 21:06