Frontera up Snowdon

Author
Discussion

Fastra

4,277 posts

211 months

Thursday 20th October 2011
quotequote all
So was it him that bought his own car from Ebay and drove it up again?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wale...

carinaman

21,413 posts

174 months

jon-

16,514 posts

218 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all

EDLT

15,421 posts

208 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
He couldn't make it because of the snow.

andyps

7,817 posts

284 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
I heard about it on the radio again today. Surely a good lawyer could get him off the charge of dangerous driving. No one even saw the car getting to the top so how could it have endangered anyone?

carreauchompeur

17,870 posts

206 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
andyps said:
I heard about it on the radio again today. Surely a good lawyer could get him off the charge of dangerous driving. No one even saw the car getting to the top so how could it have endangered anyone?
Because it went on the tracks. Cars going on tracks are very dangerous. An Intercity Express could hit them at any point.

andyps

7,817 posts

284 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Because it went on the tracks. Cars going on tracks are very dangerous. An Intercity Express could hit them at any point.
Of course, I forgot that. He was stupid and incredibly dangerous after all!

carreauchompeur

17,870 posts

206 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
andyps said:
Of course, I forgot that. He was stupid and incredibly dangerous after all!
Burn him, and his planet molester, I say!

Ynox

1,712 posts

181 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
22 months in the end....seemed a bit steep?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wale...

carreauchompeur

17,870 posts

206 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
Utterly bonkers on the face of it, however he does appear to have thumbed his fingers at the establishment repeatedly...

Does rather seem excessive when compared with sentences in cases I've personally dealt with:

Manslaughter (Death after one punch): 18 months
Glassing of innocent MoP in pub: 18 months
Jaw broken in unprovoked attack: 14 months
Driving a car up a hill, twice: 22 months

poing

8,743 posts

202 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
Utterly bonkers on the face of it, however he does appear to have thumbed his fingers at the establishment repeatedly...

Does rather seem excessive when compared with sentences in cases I've personally dealt with:

Manslaughter (Death after one punch): 18 months
Glassing of innocent MoP in pub: 18 months
Jaw broken in unprovoked attack: 14 months
Driving a car up a hill, twice: 22 months
My thoughts exactly, clearly trying to make an example of him. Reading the article he does seem to be his own worst enemy though.

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

257 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
It beggars belief. Dangerous driving going slowly up a hill with no-one around.

LukeSi

5,753 posts

163 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
Fiver on him doing it again once he is released.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

206 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
Dangerous driving for driving up to the top of a large hill along a rough track

Well i'd better give up driving to my house.


LongLiveTazio

2,714 posts

199 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
Posted in th locked thread but you see these weird sentences away from metropolitan centres. If he'd stolen the car, driven on pavements, through red lights, etc. he'd have been given a slap on the wrist. This is on the same day that a taxi driver received a 35 quid fine for killing a cyclist. I'm not saying that the latter sentence was incorrect, more that I don't see what this actually achieves?

As for sticking fingers up at 'the establishment', if you gave someone a prison sentence for not turning up to court/responding to bail you wouldn't be able to build prisons quick enough.

I daresay that if this wasn't a hill in the public consciousness it wouldn't have even created a murmur.

Crazy.

Gizmoish

Original Poster:

18,150 posts

211 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
35 quid for killing a cyclist, 22 months for driving not quite all the way up a hill. Something not quite right there.

andyps

7,817 posts

284 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
Anyone else find it slightly ironic that the judge said "Your involvement has cost many thousands of pounds to the public" and then put him in prison for 22 months. Because that won't cost the public anything? Surely community service would have been more appropriate. Cleaning litter off Snowdon for example.

As said though, he does seem to have been his own worst enemy in many ways.

madbadger

11,582 posts

246 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
Only cost has been due to over reacting.

Wasn't the choice at the time:
Helicopter it off ££££
Dismantle and train it down ££
Drive it down pp

What did they do in the end?

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

257 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
madbadger said:
Only cost has been due to over reacting.

Wasn't the choice at the time:
Helicopter it off ££££
Dismantle and train it down ££
Drive it down pp

What did they do in the end?
They dismantled the mountain.

skyrover

12,682 posts

206 months

Friday 18th January 2013
quotequote all
Brought it down on the train I believe.

Sentencing was harsh IMO and there was no grounds for dangerous driving, unless it's now an offence to put yourself in a "precarious" position

They should have stated the reason for his sentence was simply his complete disdain for the law.