RE: TVR: Back in business (there's even a website)

RE: TVR: Back in business (there's even a website)

Author
Discussion

JonRB

74,851 posts

273 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Rather pathetically, the only owner who actually tried to introduce relevant and modern business practices to TVR was the dummy sucking schmuck who bought a dead parrot for £15m.
I think you meant "rather ironically", surely?

Agreed, NS did make some attempts at improving Quality Control* before he lost interest in that and started having his slightly deranged flights of fancy and 'Orgasmic Living'. smile

( * - although the much-vaunted idea of 'filling in' the slats on the Sagaris is complete bunkum - it was more a case that it took a worker 8 hours to cut them out)

dinkel

26,987 posts

259 months

Tuesday 15th November 2011
quotequote all
So. Who drove one of these new kits?

flyingdutchie

857 posts

195 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Do not expect more than one (likely unsold) kit. They are starting just now and theydo the job in austria? Costs are over the level of a used tvr. Except the sagaris....

julianc

1,984 posts

260 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Although, having said that, I'd have preferred it if they hadn't have been in the habit of drawing genitalia and other graffiti in marker pen on the bare GRP before it was trimmed. smile
For me, that's part of the personality of a TVR - it matches what the cars are about. wink

Funky Jo

164 posts

191 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
wombat172a said:
Theoretical thought here:

If Smolenski starts producing TVR cars on the continent, do the cars not need to be TUV approved to sell them in Germany/Austria/France etc?

If so how much work would it take to get even a modern TVR up to TUV spec?

Otherwise he can't sell them on the continent can he, or is the intention to build abroad and sell them only in the UK?
Yep, no CoC = no TUV = no sales

Edited by Funky Jo on Wednesday 16th November 22:47

DonkeyApple

55,768 posts

170 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
Funky Jo said:
Yep, no CoC = no TUV = no
NS = CoC. Yes?

Caractacus

2,604 posts

226 months

Wednesday 16th November 2011
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Funky Jo said:
Yep, no CoC = no TUV = no
NS = CoC. Yes?
yes

The formula is sound and reasoning correct.

Top of the class for you, young man.




900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
In the modern world where secondary sales are so vital to revenue streams of manufacturers, it was another failure of TVR to not control the mod/upgrade market for their products. The revenue stream from offering a tranche of company sanctioned upgrade packages would have rivalled the primary sales income quite quickly.
Absolutely. Again, look at the businesses that stay afloat at the sort of scale that would be sustainable for TVR - steady stream of income from aftermarket and/or motorsport, with a few new road cars being built for good measure (and magazine column inches). smile

The size of the TVR aftermarket vs. the # of cars on the road is more proof if one would need it...

JR

12,722 posts

259 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
900T-R said:
DonkeyApple said:
In the modern world where secondary sales are so vital to revenue streams of manufacturers, it was another failure of TVR to not control the mod/upgrade market for their products. The revenue stream from offering a tranche of company sanctioned upgrade packages would have rivalled the primary sales income quite quickly.
Absolutely. Again, look at the businesses that stay afloat at the sort of scale that would be sustainable for TVR - steady stream of income from aftermarket and/or motorsport, with a few new road cars being built for good measure (and magazine column inches). smile

The size of the TVR aftermarket vs. the # of cars on the road is more proof if one would need it...
In their defence this is why they introduced 18" wheels. (OK a weak defence...)

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
JR said:
In their defence this is why they introduced 18" wheels. (OK a weak defence...)
I think their biggest coup though, was devising a wheel/brake upgrade for Chimaeras and Griffiths at an unbeatable price when they were confronted with a mountain of 16" wheels that no one wanted... wink

JR

12,722 posts

259 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
900T-R said:
JR said:
In their defence this is why they introduced 18" wheels. (OK a weak defence...)
I think their biggest coup though, was devising a wheel/brake upgrade for Chimaeras and Griffiths at an unbeatable price when they were confronted with a mountain of 16" wheels that no one wanted... wink
It would have been if they hadn't decided to stop selling them after about five kits.

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Ah. Typical... biggrin

Jack1988

23 posts

150 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
I think at the end of the day it can be a good thing for TVR, for all those that are moaning about the American V8s, you forget that the first ever V8 in a TVR was American!

So what the new TVR will have a Chevvy engine, yes its the same as in the new Camaros and they are slow but because they are Heavy. I believe that this is the same engine that was in the 2008 Corvette which boasted 187mph and 0-60 in 4.0 seconds? Sounds more appealing doesnt it. Then the ZR1 is the same engine but Supercharged and that did 205mph? and 0-60 in under 4 seconds? Just imagine how quick these are going to be in super light weight TVRs that weigh under a Tonne!

I may not be accurate but just trying to make a few pointers. Dont get it twisted though. id rather have a Cerbera 4.5 anyday!

JonRB

74,851 posts

273 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Jack1988 said:
So what the new TVR will have a Chevvy engine
What new TVR? Have you even read the article or this thread? confused

Jack1988

23 posts

150 months

Tuesday 22nd November 2011
quotequote all
Ok, "reborn TVRs" or yours and our TVRs with New engines. Thanks for the correction

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

231 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Jack1988 said:
So what the new TVR will have a Chevvy engine
What new TVR? Have you even read the article or this thread? confused
Jesus, is it any wonder that PH is regarded as 'elitist' and a 'members only club' on other forums with an attitude like this?

The guys first post and he gets you jumping down his throat for the sake of a simple turn of phrase.

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
JonRB said:
What new TVR? Have you even read the article or this thread? confused
In fact, you can have a new TVR apparently. It may not be a new model strictly (although an LS-powered Tuscan or Sagaris may well be classed as such) but then we're into semantics...

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
It is very curious that there are so many dreams of building sportscars with Corvette mechanicals when it's so much easier to go out and buy a thoroughly designed and engineered Corvette!

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Yeah, why have Kate Moss when you could also go out with Britney Spears... hehe

For the 100th time: the Vette is great. But it's not a small, intimate sportscar with a stonking big engine in the Cobra mould. Either you 'get' that or you don't. The latter happens to be what gets my juices flowing and I'm afraid I'm not interested in a bigger, fatter, more remote substitute even if it's ultimately more 'capable'.

Also the Vette is very er, American inside and out. Not a style that I'm a particular fan of.



Edited by 900T-R on Wednesday 23 November 14:37

JenkinsComp

918 posts

248 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Everything about this makes me feel ill.

First of all seeing a website called "www.tvrmotors.EU" pffff.

Seeing TVR GmbH at the bottom of the screen not TVR Motors, Blackpool.

Seeing old TVRs with a decent but quite reasonably priced Chevy V8 but costing 100k!

Seeing a new TVR website with the wrong TVR logo

Why didn't this twit just design his own car and quit f#cking around with a well loved brand.

I'm sure it's all been said before but hey, its my turn.