Best smoker barges 1-5 large [Vol 9]
Discussion
BigBen said:
0a said:
CharlesdeGaulle said:
And then there's this. Scarily cheap. If only it were on e-bay and I was trolleyed ...
http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C679130
Lovely!http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C679130
Would having two R107s be considered greedy?
A bit concerned this one's being sold as a restoration project, a little bit of bodywork on one of these could mean something quite involved. I like the colourscheme though. As a 1980 it should be on the Fuchs "Mexican hat" alloys.
harrykul said:
idiotgap said:
I'd love to know what people pay for Nick's cars, prices never visible. My hunch is that 6k wouldn't do it though.
Don't think it's far off £6k actually, but then again that was for a high mile, basic spec 300dt a few years ago. Probably 8-10 now.harrykul said:
idiotgap said:
I'd love to know what people pay for Nick's cars, prices never visible. My hunch is that 6k wouldn't do it though.
Don't think it's far off £6k actually, but then again that was for a high mile, basic spec 300dt a few years ago. Probably 8-10 now.idiotgap said:
I think one's enough for me!
A bit concerned this one's being sold as a restoration project, a little bit of bodywork on one of these could mean something quite involved. I like the colourscheme though. As a 1980 it should be on the Fuchs "Mexican hat" alloys.
That simple change of wheels makes it look like a much later car, absence of front spoiler aside. Agree that the colour scheme is very nice and again unusual particularly on an early 80s carA bit concerned this one's being sold as a restoration project, a little bit of bodywork on one of these could mean something quite involved. I like the colourscheme though. As a 1980 it should be on the Fuchs "Mexican hat" alloys.
BigBen said:
idiotgap said:
I think one's enough for me!
A bit concerned this one's being sold as a restoration project, a little bit of bodywork on one of these could mean something quite involved. I like the colourscheme though. As a 1980 it should be on the Fuchs "Mexican hat" alloys.
That simple change of wheels makes it look like a much later car, absence of front spoiler aside. Agree that the colour scheme is very nice and again unusual particularly on an early 80s carA bit concerned this one's being sold as a restoration project, a little bit of bodywork on one of these could mean something quite involved. I like the colourscheme though. As a 1980 it should be on the Fuchs "Mexican hat" alloys.
Today's obsession: http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C632892
It's in Spain. Marbella. The long haul back is part of the attraction.
It's in Spain. Marbella. The long haul back is part of the attraction.
r129sl said:
BigBen said:
idiotgap said:
I think one's enough for me!
A bit concerned this one's being sold as a restoration project, a little bit of bodywork on one of these could mean something quite involved. I like the colourscheme though. As a 1980 it should be on the Fuchs "Mexican hat" alloys.
That simple change of wheels makes it look like a much later car, absence of front spoiler aside. Agree that the colour scheme is very nice and again unusual particularly on an early 80s carA bit concerned this one's being sold as a restoration project, a little bit of bodywork on one of these could mean something quite involved. I like the colourscheme though. As a 1980 it should be on the Fuchs "Mexican hat" alloys.
Personally I think the flat face alloys look much better than the Mexican hats.
It does look very tidy in the photos and the M110 engine is a classic.
0a said:
edo said:
Individual - ie there's only one individual who can stand it!Stegel said:
CharlesdeGaulle said:
The market has spoken. The threadists's choice is worth* one third of a '78 Cavalier.
http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C679137
It's quality MB young-timers vs mundane Ford stuff that puzzles me - Anglia Car Auctions and the like regularly see 1.3 Escorts and the like exceeding by a good margin MB and BMW stuff that would have cost 4 or 5 times at least the original cost and offers a similar multiple of driving pleasure - I'm attracted to stuff I could not have possibly aspired to in my 20's and 30's rather than the wallpaper cars of that era (even with bigger engines - now a 24v Senator may be a different matter). http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C679137
- Acknowledging the nuance here.
Edited by Stegel on Sunday 8th November 20:47
I see what you mean though. Taste is an individual thing; I struggle to understand why so few threadists choose a nimble smooth-riding, Jag and prefer a lumbering Mercedes!
edo said:
They're either colour blind and it looks a lovely set of matching shades to them, or they're insane 0a said:
There's also this one from the same page: http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C634172XJR V8, 97k, £2,795. Great value both of them, assuming you can afford the fuel....
callahan said:
There's also this one from the same page: http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C634172
XJR V8, 97k, £2,795. Great value both of them, assuming you can afford the fuel....
Stunning. XJR V8, 97k, £2,795. Great value both of them, assuming you can afford the fuel....
No cruise control on a £60k loony-power long-legged GT-eating super-saloon. Utterly infuriating.
0a said:
Exactly the spec of the car on the poster I was given on the Jaguar show stand at the NEC in 1994, when I solemnly promised myself one of these.Still haven't kept that promise, but it's getting closer.
SpeckledJim said:
Stunning.
No cruise control on a £60k loony-power long-legged GT-eating super-saloon. Utterly infuriating.
I take your point, but on every car I've ever had with it, I think I've used it once to check it works and then never again. I don't like driving with it and, for me, its absence falls into the category of one less thing to go wrong with cars this age. No cruise control on a £60k loony-power long-legged GT-eating super-saloon. Utterly infuriating.
CharlesdeGaulle said:
SpeckledJim said:
Stunning.
No cruise control on a £60k loony-power long-legged GT-eating super-saloon. Utterly infuriating.
I take your point, but on every car I've ever had with it, I think I've used it once to check it works and then never again. I don't like driving with it and, for me, its absence falls into the category of one less thing to go wrong with cars this age. No cruise control on a £60k loony-power long-legged GT-eating super-saloon. Utterly infuriating.
- Cruise control
- Heated seats
A car without the above has to be extremely [insert something good] to be justifiable over a Mondeo.
That (any) XJR is of course a lot nicer than a Mondeo, but other erstwhile barges without CC and HS risk failing the 'But How Is It Better Than A Mondeo?' Test.
BHIIBTAM?
W00DY said:
Wow, if its that bad on the surface I dread to think what it is like underneath! My 1987 W126 is not as bad as that! Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff