RE: Insignia VXR Supersport: 170mph for sub £30K

RE: Insignia VXR Supersport: 170mph for sub £30K

Author
Discussion

Matt UK

17,807 posts

202 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
Pixelpeep said:
Big engined premium brands don't do too well either i don't think

In the PH classifieds today...

3 Year old BMW 5 SERIES 530i SE 4dr (2009) £14,981
3 Year old Vauxhall Insignia VXR 2.8T Red (2009) £21,999

Both roughly the same new price.. interesting!
Links?

Grovsie26

1,302 posts

169 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
TomTVR500 said:
You’re not the first person that has sniggered at 0-60 mph in 5.6 seconds in this thread and it makes me laugh.

What planet do you people live on? I am aware that the new wave of supercars and hypercars are producing figures close to this to 100mph and I love a ridiculously fast car as much as the next person on PH but come on, 0-60 in 5.6 seconds out on the road is still fast and in all likelihood more performance than you can hope to use monday-friday.

Also where is the fun in pulling a paddle or pressing a button, flooring the throttle, removing your foot from the brake and leaving the throttle pinned until you bottle it or start to fear for your licence?

Pointless!
Thank you. Someone with half a brain. God bless you.

Does the engine in it respond well to a remap, better breathing mods?

Kawasicki

13,144 posts

237 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Honestly, how can these myths just go on and on and on. It's weird. I drove a Cavalier from the '80s and despite having an a very poor reputation for handling it was just fine. Don't believe everything you either read or think that you have read in a magazine. Some journalists have no idea.

v8will

3,301 posts

198 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
Might be worth a punt after 3 years of depreciation has taken its toll. Did the Evo long termer not have issues with its brakes though? IIRC the cost of replacement was silly.

At this price bracket I would find it very difficult to look past BMW, they seem to be on the ball at the moment.

AM04ARO

3,642 posts

217 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
arcticnick said:
I seriously considered buying one last year. The lifetime warranty and the discounts available, plus finance, were hard to resist.

Also, I have a family, I enjoy skiing and thought it would be perfect for a fast drive to the Alps and back with a load of gear in the boot / on the roof etc. I think the estate is the best looking of the bunch. Fast, comfy, cheap for a new car. I also agreed to stop changing cars all the time so was looking to keep it for 5-7 years.

I didn't buy one because I am living abroad and didn't fancy having to negotiate with Opel Europe every time I wanted to claim on the lifetime warranty (I was not naive enough to think I wouldn't need it.)

I got a 335i Touring instead - a comparable car, which is smaller, less well equipped, cost more new (I bought mine at 3 years old) and doesn't cope as well in the snow without the winter wheels and tyres I bought. And the badge didn't swing I for me, it was the powertrain. But, I still think a VXR estate would have been a perfect car for the family.

So - there is a private market for these new (albeit it may just have been me), and also those buyers will also compare new and old (I had the S4 and a 530i Touring on the same list).

Not sure where that falls on the debate....
Interestingly I chose the VXR estate over an E class.

It is a great family car that can be driven a little quickly and has great pops and bangs on the overrun. The merc dealer was awful so became an easy decision and 4wd over rear wheel was preferred.

Great car which I expect to keep for a long time - but as the family car not the fun/fast car.

s m

23,343 posts

205 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
v8will said:
Might be worth a punt after 3 years of depreciation has taken its toll. Did the Evo long termer not have issues with its brakes though? IIRC the cost of replacement was silly.

.

A set of front discs and pads (345mm) seems to be about £200-£220 ish for genuine parts

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Genuine-Vauxhall-Opel-Ve...

Big discs so don't seem ruinous?

jbi

12,682 posts

206 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
why why why can't they send the power to the back wheels only frown

Crafty_

13,344 posts

202 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
^ Not VXR.

VXR Has a brembo floating disc set up


Likely to be expensive.

AM04ARO

3,642 posts

217 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
jbi said:
why why why can't they send the power to the back wheels only frown
I believe in VXR mode it is around 90% to the rear.

s m

23,343 posts

205 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
^ Not VXR.

VXR Has a brembo floating disc set up


Likely to be expensive.
Ah, yes my mistake- I thought he was on about the Vectra VXR

Yes the Insignia ones were really dear.
They replace them F.O.C. iirc if your car had done under 20k after the problems that were reported

H100S

1,436 posts

175 months

Thursday 8th November 2012
quotequote all
v8will said:
Might be worth a punt after 3 years of depreciation has taken its toll. Did the Evo long termer not have issues with its brakes though? IIRC the cost of replacement was silly.

At this price bracket I would find it very difficult to look past BMW, they seem to be on the ball at the moment.
These have 355 mm front discs gripped by Brembo 4 piston calipers, i think you will find they are as big as a ferrari 360 so yes they are expensive !

I would be very interested to know how many people have commented on this car with out even driving one. They are very different to a regular Insignia.
Sub 6 to 60 is quick enough to raise most passengers eyebrows and the quality is considerably better in Vauxhalls previous models.

http://courtenaysport.co.uk/insignia-vxr-tuning/in... 340bhp and 410lbft should improve things not to mention 100bhp gain at only 3600rpm for only £595
http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=... Cold start up they sound good

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

220 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
I ran a VXR for a 16 months and have the following to say about it,

The handling was more than equal to any Fast VAG product if not BMW. But fun enough on the right road.
The traction in wet weather (And we get a lot remember) was first rate, it was also pretty damn good in snow.
They are huge, plenty of space inside and enough room in the boot for two bodies.
Build was good apart from a squeaky centre console (Dealer never fixed).
The brakes were almost Porsche like.
It was manual............... stuff your crap paddles.
The noise was great.

The car is big, so it will not handle like a go kart.
The car is heavier than it should be - this blunts some of the performance
The cost of brake services etc is higher than you would hope.
The cost of tyres on the 20 inch wheels is eye watering.
The back up by Vauxhall is poor they bh and winge about warranty claims. (Water got into both rear lights, they said they all do that and refused to change them) If they want to move up market with products, the service must follow.
The cost of keeping it fed was also very high.

However on the whole i enjoyed it and now driving an Auto Merc E Class, yes i miss it.

Please remember i was an owner not a keyboard warrior.

CraigyMc

16,567 posts

238 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
H100S said:
http://courtenaysport.co.uk/insignia-vxr-tuning/in... 340bhp and 410lbft should improve things not to mention 100bhp gain at only 3600rpm for only £595
http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=... Cold start up they sound good
The car could be made a lot quicker simply by removing the torque-limiting in 1st and 2nd gears, but there's quite likely a good reason why is was limited in the first place...

C

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

192 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
H100S said:
http://courtenaysport.co.uk/insignia-vxr-tuning/in... 340bhp and 410lbft should improve things not to mention 100bhp gain at only 3600rpm for only £595
http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=... Cold start up they sound good
The car could be made a lot quicker simply by removing the torque-limiting in 1st and 2nd gears, but there's quite likely a good reason why is was limited in the first place...

C
I suspect it's limited for mass production and to reduce wheel spin. Transmissions are often a weak spot, but an individual may well be fine removing such restrictions.

CraigyMc

16,567 posts

238 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
I suspect it's limited for mass production and to reduce wheel spin. Transmissions are often a weak spot, but an individual may well be fine removing such restrictions.
Yep, that's why.

For the record, VXR-fans, BMW do something like this with their clutches.
They fit a hydraulic valve which limits how fast the clutch can "drop", to stop someone sidestepping the clutch at peak revs from causing a massive shunt through the driveline. Obviously it can still engage quickly, but not as fast as you might expect.
M cars don't have the valve.

Gearboxes are rated by torque. This thing peaks at 325lb/ft. I wonder if the haldex clutch based thingy in the centre is the limiting factor..

C

JREwing

17,540 posts

181 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
prg123 said:
Hmmmm wasn't saying vauxhall is st, I was saying that to get around the issue of badge snobs vauxhall should perhaps create a premium sub brand......
Sorry, that wasn't aimed at you!

JREwing

17,540 posts

181 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
From what I'm hearing from actual owners I'm dangerously close to filling myself with cider and signing a finance deal.....

s_zigmond

1,139 posts

188 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Yep, that's why.

For the record, VXR-fans, BMW do something like this with their clutches.
They fit a hydraulic valve which limits how fast the clutch can "drop", to stop someone sidestepping the clutch at peak revs from causing a massive shunt through the driveline. Obviously it can still engage quickly, but not as fast as you might expect.
M cars don't have the valve.

Gearboxes are rated by torque. This thing peaks at 325lb/ft. I wonder if the haldex clutch based thingy in the centre is the limiting factor..

C
I believe that the gearbox is the limiting factor. I think it still uses the F40 gearbox, which peaks in standard form at 400nm. This has been uped (not sure how) for the insignia VXR. However the standard gear box is running fine with over 400lbft on plenty of Vectra VXR's

JREwing

17,540 posts

181 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
v8will said:
Might be worth a punt after 3 years of depreciation has taken its toll. Did the Evo long termer not have issues with its brakes though? IIRC the cost of replacement was silly.

At this price bracket I would find it very difficult to look past BMW, they seem to be on the ball at the moment.
As far as I can tell, the depreciation seems remarkably low. I'd buy new for the warranty.
At this price bracket? What comparable BMW is available brand new for £23,555? wink

Crafty_

13,344 posts

202 months

Friday 9th November 2012
quotequote all
Limits on low gears is nothing new, cavalier & calibra turbo had the same thing, inhibited boost in 1st and 2nd.