Supercars spotted, some rarities (vol 7)
Discussion
pidsy said:
I thought it was only along the top of the tyre that counts? If not, my truck is very very illegal.
I thought the tread has to be inside the wheel arch line. I'm guessing that any tread outside the wheel arch may cause debris/projectiles to eject rearwards - at significant speed - into the path of following vehicles.If anyone can point to the MOT test rules on this that would be appreciated?
AMG Merc said:
pidsy said:
I thought it was only along the top of the tyre that counts? If not, my truck is very very illegal.
I thought the tread has to be inside the wheel arch line. I'm guessing that any tread outside the wheel arch may cause debris/projectiles to eject rearwards - at significant speed - into the path of following vehicles.If anyone can point to the MOT test rules on this that would be appreciated?
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1986/1078/regul...
Todd Bonzalez said:
The law is a percentage. I design cars for a living and always get sent envelopes to cover by engineeering. If you look at a Caterham or something that will be set on the minimum.
well the law isn't a percentage, but compliance with it can be achieved with some degree of flexibility. The Brummie said:
CarHabit said:
Doofus said:
moneymakestheworldgoaround said:
Dapster said:
Lunchtime on Regent St today.
Daily Driver. I hated the way these looked when they were launched, and time has not been kind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxBzTVoFHXQ&t=...
The Dangerous Elk said:
AMG Merc said:
any tread outside the wheel arch may cause debris/projectiles to eject rearwards - at significant speed - into the path of following vehicles.
Fecking stupid design and very dangerous. As an ex-biker I HATE that, it is a fecking machine gun !.Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff