RE: BMW Mulls Over Turbocharged V6

RE: BMW Mulls Over Turbocharged V6

Author
Discussion

Otispunkmeyer

12,662 posts

157 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
soxboy said:
So a firm with the engineering clout of BMW and many millions of Euros worth of CAD/CAM equipment submits its drawings to the patent office in hand drawn pen & ink?

Hmmmm
I've looked over many patents and that hand drawn look is par for the course.

Otispunkmeyer

12,662 posts

157 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
yes Given how good NVH isolation is on modern cars, I'm quite surprised BMW have persisted with inline sixes for as long as they have.
I6 is one of only 3 engine configs in perfect natural balance for first and second order vibrations. Why would you want to get rid of that and spend lots of money on a 4 banger with 2 balancer shafts to get similar smoothness?

j_s14a

863 posts

180 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
BMW, the last vestige of the straight six...

Hungry Pigeon

224 posts

186 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
I've looked over many patents and that hand drawn look is par for the course.
Spot on. I write patent applications for a living, and it's usually a simple matter of either the client not wanting to pay for posh formal drawings (when you can tart them up later at your leisure), or there's not enough time to get formals drawn up before the application has to be filed.

That said, even though I always file with informal drawings, I do always try to use drawing software so that it looks half-way decent....although I do remember one occasion when I had so little time that the application went in with a photo of a sketch that was drawn on the back of a beer mat biggrin

Gad-Westy

14,682 posts

215 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
soxboy said:
So a firm with the engineering clout of BMW and many millions of Euros worth of CAD/CAM equipment submits its drawings to the patent office in hand drawn pen & ink?

Hmmmm
I've looked over many patents and that hand drawn look is par for the course.
yes If anything, it's rather neat for patent document. Many are simply hand sketches from people of varying degrees of artistic incompetence.

I haven't done an application for some time but I seem to remember there being some quite rigid guide lines about the presentation that made doing the work on CAD quite tricky.

0a

23,907 posts

196 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
It's not surprising that they are at least reviewing their options, keep them on their toes!

kambites

67,708 posts

223 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
kambites said:
yes Given how good NVH isolation is on modern cars, I'm quite surprised BMW have persisted with inline sixes for as long as they have.
I6 is one of only 3 engine configs in perfect natural balance for first and second order vibrations. Why would you want to get rid of that and spend lots of money on a 4 banger with 2 balancer shafts to get similar smoothness?
The thread is about a potential V6, not an I4 and the reasons for switching are numerous and are discussed above.

R500POP

8,790 posts

212 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
roberthiggs said:
I've never seen a diagram make so little sense to me before :S
It actually makes sense.

Fuel goes in from 17a/b, into cylinders z, out into single exhaust into turbo 4&5 via valve thing 6, can be diverted by 9 (Ithink, could all be bolloz though)

Frik

13,544 posts

245 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
Agreed, looks like any other patent I've seen, especially one from BMW.

As others have said, a V6 does have packaging advantages in terms of reducing the overall length of the engine.

troc

3,794 posts

177 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
Hungry Pigeon said:
Spot on. I write patent applications for a living, and it's usually a simple matter of either the client not wanting to pay for posh formal drawings (when you can tart them up later at your leisure), or there's not enough time to get formals drawn up before the application has to be filed.

That said, even though I always file with informal drawings, I do always try to use drawing software so that it looks half-way decent....although I do remember one occasion when I had so little time that the application went in with a photo of a sketch that was drawn on the back of a beer mat biggrin
Meh, dammed hand-drawn figures. I'm blaming you next time I open an application to search smile

DreadedDev

13 posts

167 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
It's seems funny that the main thread of discussion is whether it's real or not... maybe this does show how actually no real petrolhead gives a flying kahoona burger what type of petrol burning device powers a car, it's how it handles, accelerates and drives that we really care about! Personally I prefer the sound of a V engine over a flat engine any day so from that point it can only be an improvement on the current offering....

British Beef

2,251 posts

167 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
+ 1

A bigger loss in the BMW engine line up is NA and not cyclinder configuration.

All for economy, emissions bla bla bla....

Kazlet

278 posts

173 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
roberthiggs said:
I've never seen a diagram make so little sense to me before :S
Its a simple two stage twin scroll turbo set up for a V6, its not possible to tell from the drawing what the patent application might be for. It doesnt seem to contain anything novel.

The Wookie

13,987 posts

230 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
Has anybody noted the fact that the diagrams appear to indicate that the exhaust ports (and thus manifolds and turbos) will be situated within the V, rather than the inlet?

Probably not unheard of, but quite unusual

E30M3SE

8,469 posts

198 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
The Wookie said:
Has anybody noted the fact that the diagrams appear to indicate that the exhaust ports (and thus manifolds and turbos) will be situated within the V, rather than the inlet?

Probably not unheard of, but quite unusual
That is how the upcomimg F10 M5's V8 bi turbo is designed, the same set up is also used on a number of other large BMW's X5M. X6M, 550i 750i/L....

The Wookie

13,987 posts

230 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Spot on, I had no idea

TheOrangePeril

778 posts

182 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
FesterNath said:
Erm... to make an official application to a professional body look, well, professional?
This would imply that you're in a profession other than engineering?...

chuntington101

5,733 posts

238 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Intresting

2 exhaust turbines on the right hand bank turbo on the V6.


[pistonheadmode]OH god the horror of a V6 next they will make an inline 4 in the M3[/pistonheadmode]
YEah i noticed that. I would guse thats a twin scroll turbo. The second trubo would really need to be as its a sequentical setup so lag shouldn't be a problem.

Chris.

Contigo

3,115 posts

211 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
BMW only now just realising that the Audi RS4 B5 engine was far better than the Straigh Six effort from the M3!

Forced induction V6 engines are simply outstanding and I reckon the V6 engine fitted to the B5 S4 and RS4 is one of the best ever made and has massive tuning potential.


Contigo

3,115 posts

211 months

Monday 12th September 2011
quotequote all
Some Turbo Engines do I agree but the specific engine in the B5 was awesome. It had massive boost and a good kick but also had a good feel of an NA engine.

I don't really like NA engines as much, I had an M6 with the V10 and it was brutal on accelration but no where near as much fun as the power delivery of the B5 and the same applied to the V8 engine in the B7 I had.

Horses for courses.