Cars which aren't as bad as they're made out to be...

Cars which aren't as bad as they're made out to be...

Author
Discussion

RosscoPCole

3,336 posts

175 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
As mentioned the first generation Ford KA. Was a hoot to drive. Got rid of mine just before the rust set in. Replaced it with a Toyota Yaris and again was very impressed by its versitility. Takes the family away on holiday and is just as comfortable hooning around the back roads.

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

220 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
s m said:
Alfanatic said:
I've driven a few Opels and Vauxhalls, and in general they have all been great engines in attractive bodies, with handling that was usually safe but was consistently miserable. In this case I don't think Clarkson was exaggerating.
I thought the Manta I had was a very nice handling car. The CIH engine wasn't a stormer like the XE but I'd describe the handling as much better than miserable
Fair enough, I'll freely admit that my Opel / Vauxhall experience is limited to various FWD cars from a 1983 1.3 Kadett (which, when I think back, wasn't so bad actually, but then it was the first car I'd ever driven) to a 2005 Vectra estate something or other that was the worst of the lot.

Personal opinion for sure, I know a fair few people who are as enthusiastic about driving as I am but got on very well with the cars I hated.

I'll also happily admit I've always wanted a go in an Opel GT too. Lovely looking car that only needs to be half as good to drive as it looks to win me over. Rare car though so I'd think my chances are slim biggrin

s m

23,306 posts

204 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
Similarly, the Mk2 Astra GTE 16v I had - always wanted one as a friend had one new. His seemed pretty good but 10 years after they were new, general opinion was they were a bit poor. Decent tyres and a good alignment meant it was a pleasant surprise and the same car that did well in the Autocar triple test and Car mag comparison with the Golf Gti. Truly the Focus RS mk1 of its day

Y282

20,566 posts

173 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
I bloody loved the shape of the calibra. If only itd been rwd.

TwoTonneKarmann

10,974 posts

158 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
I haven't read all the thread..

Kia Ceed.


Hammer67

5,749 posts

185 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all

CDP

7,465 posts

255 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
I've always thought the MG TF was okay, in the right colour. Though the interior is disastrously cheap and the MX5's at the price range were better to drive. Still, it does provide that mid-engined experience, which is nice, though done much better by an MR2 at a similar price.
My TF handles far better than my 1990 MR2 MK2; I can't comment on the MK3. The interior is a peculiar mix of expensive feeling bits and packaging-quality plastics while the driving position's too high but on the whole it's really good little car. What MG didn't skimp on was the braking system. Perfectly weighted and extremely powerful the ABS only kicks in when it's absolutely necessary. At least on the optional uprated system...

My Leyland Princess 2200HL really has to count as an underrated car. Only one breakdown (a light switch) and unmatched comfort; it's almost like being in bed. Then there's that six cylinder engine. Didn't rot like a typical 70's car either, even if all the paint dropped off.









V8Wagon

1,707 posts

161 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
I owned three early shape Vectra's (the 'B'). I really liked mine. The 1.8 never gave me any trouble at all in 40k miles and I then replaced it with a 2.6 GSi estate which if I am honest I loved. The engine was a peach, smooth and torquey. I also liked the rarity factor, it looked great in my opinion with the GSi bumper and I only saw a handful of other GSi's in the couple of years I owned it.

I'd have another.

Lordglenmorangie

3,057 posts

206 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
MX5 getmecoat

martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
Based on a couple of weeks of ownership im going to say the Rover 75. It might not universally be known as a terrible car but its referred to as a pile of rubbish in some quarters as well as being a bit of a punch line as people laugh and point because its a Rover.

boobles

15,241 posts

216 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
Elise... Always gets slated by people who have never owned one for reliability issues, yet they are as reliable as most other cars out there.

Justmike

19 posts

150 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
Rover metro - I had a 1.1 k series and it went and handled better than you would think. Felt faster than it was and could keep up with plenty of "better" metal on a back road blast.

Ive had a few k series engined motors and have to say ive always been really impressed by them.

Also whoever mentioned the mondeo - had a mk1 and it was one of the best cars ive owned (maybe thats not saying much!)

martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Saturday 26th November 2011
quotequote all
Justmike said:
Also whoever mentioned the mondeo - had a mk1 and it was one of the best cars ive owned (maybe thats not saying much!)
I had a mk1 as well, it was the first car i bought (i'd been bought a Fiesta 1.1 after i passed my test), 1.8 GLX in blue. Fantastic thing. I did nearly 40,000 miles in it (and it had 90k on it when i got it) and aside from replacing an indicator bulb, it was 100% trouble free.

MartyPubes

900 posts

160 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
markmullen said:
3000GT. Accept that it is never going to be the nimblest back road scorcher with that weight and for the money it makes a lot of sense.
Exactly what I was thinking when I clicked on the thread.

Also - all FWD cars if you take the opinion of many on here. Yes, I can 'feel' the difference, and it's not for me but for commuting/driving to the shops it's absolutely fine.

Tunku

7,703 posts

229 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
Mini Metro 1.0L

vit4

3,507 posts

171 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
Ford Escort Mk4; ours has been pretty much bulletproof, only thing of note that's needed replacing has been a water pump which was dirt cheap anyway smile Very comfortable, economical (40-45 mpg without really trying, could probably get high 40's if I was a bit easier on the throttle and stuck to 60odd on the M-way). I'd imagine an RS Turbo with well-sorted suspension & tyres would be a hoot, you know where the car is in a way you just don't seem to get with modern stuff (not sure if that makes sense hehe).

Daniel1

2,931 posts

199 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
vit4 said:
Ford Escort Mk4; ours has been pretty much bulletproof, only thing of note that's needed replacing has been a water pump which was dirt cheap anyway smile Very comfortable, economical (40-45 mpg without really trying, could probably get high 40's if I was a bit easier on the throttle and stuck to 60odd on the M-way). I'd imagine an RS Turbo with well-sorted suspension & tyres would be a hoot, you know where the car is in a way you just don't seem to get with modern stuff (not sure if that makes sense hehe).
I had a 200bhp RS turbo and it was indeed a hoot. Not very fast round corners even with "decent" suspension but the lack of powersteering, tremendous torque steer and a great '80's essex vibe (mine was white hehe ) made me enjoy mine. Best thing was the old school turbo boost. Foot to the floor and nothing, nothing, nothing, BOOST, wheelspin, repeat with next gear. In fact im off to ebay...

Toaster Pilot

14,623 posts

159 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
Kia Picanto getmecoat

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

227 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
Hammer67 said:
Mrs J had one of these. Very pleasing steering.

Which is the one thing in a car, other than the seat, that you use all the time.

rb5er

11,657 posts

173 months

Sunday 27th November 2011
quotequote all
V8Wagon said:
The 1.8 never gave me any trouble at all in 40k miles and I then replaced it with a 2.6 GSi estate which if I am honest I loved.
I thought the gsi's were a 2.5 v6 and it was the sri that got a 2.5 or a 2.6? I know a friend bought an sri 2.6 anyway.