RE: Shed Of The Week: Citroen Saxo VTR

RE: Shed Of The Week: Citroen Saxo VTR

Author
Discussion

raceboy

13,139 posts

281 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Had one 'on the fleet' some years ago, not exactly the best photo to evaluate ride height, didn't drive it much but remember it being quite fun and according to AskMid it's still alive. driving
The shed on here looks like it's only just fit for banger racing, that car has had a hard life. rotate


Howard-

4,953 posts

203 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
There's nothing unmolested about that. What a ghastly piece of st.

steve1386

57 posts

173 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Awful steaming piles of crap.

Bought largely by idiots, driven like even bigger idiots, and you'd be lucky to survive a crash in one at anything above 20.

This is a car I wish was never invented!

angelicupstarts

257 posts

132 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
steve1386 said:
Awful steaming piles of crap.

Bought largely by idiots, driven like even bigger idiots, and you'd be lucky to survive a crash in one at anything above 20.

This is a car I wish was never invented!
stop beating around the bush , what are you trying to say ?

GranCab

2,902 posts

147 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
I wouldn't say they were flimsy but ... this one was hit by a low flying pigeon



jiggawhat2k

111 posts

119 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
I had one for about 6 months. 2x gearboxes later and I was sick of it. Also you literally need tiny child feet to drive one, pedals are so close together. Had to have a pair of driving shoes like my mum. Buzzed around nicely when it worked though.

Brompty

153 posts

145 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
There is something very wrong with this car. Panel gaps are all over the place; the front offside headlight is no longer attached; the front offside bonnet and trim is all over the place. The ride height is wrong, etc etc. No, not a good shed this week; must try harder.

white_goodman

4,042 posts

192 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
So this or last week's pristine Escort Encore? wink

white_goodman

4,042 posts

192 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Not in the PH classifieds but for 50 quid more, this one looks way nicer and more standard.

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2017...

Weren't these more like 98/100bhp?

mini95

241 posts

246 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
I bought a VTR new in 1998, I had an AX diesel at the time and it was actually cheaper to buy new than the ex demo I went to look at. I loved that car, my first new one which I sold to my dad when I got my first company car.

It then got sold to a girl that fitted crappy Lexus style rear lights then smashed it up. I would have another original one again!

Zedboy1200

816 posts

212 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Perhaps it's my age (I prefer the term retro), but I chuckled all through this week's read ... great journalism :-)

carl_w

9,216 posts

259 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
GranCab said:
I wouldn't say they were flimsy but ... this one was hit by a low flying pigeon


Conversely this one was rolled corner over corner at Honington. Every panel bent, no glass broken, started and ran OK.






Kitchski

6,516 posts

232 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
white_goodman said:
Not in the PH classifieds but for 50 quid more, this one looks way nicer and more standard.

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2017...

Weren't these more like 98/100bhp?
Bloody hell, that's a much better one!

98bhp from 2001 onwards. Head had slightly bigger valves, couple of minor tweaks etc. Not far off S2 Rallye setup, and they do feel a bit pokier than the 90bhp ones.

Legend has it that some VTRs have the sports gearset fitted too (ratios used in Rallyes, VTS, AX GT etc), but strangely nobody knows which models got it hehe

Hub

6,450 posts

199 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Yes I'm surprised it took so long for the dodgy panel gaps to get mentioned - just look at the front! Wheels are horrible too. Shed author needs to go to Specsavers if they think it is "smart looking" and "unmolested". (Oh and I think MOT reference to indicators being the incorrect colour normally just means the bulbs are so old the paint has peeled off to clear rather than necessarily a chavvy modification!)

HardMiles

321 posts

87 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
probably chalk said:
I can't think of anything to say.
This is brilliant, quite possibly the best response I've read on a fiverum ever!!!!

crumblingsills

11 posts

86 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
Dark forces have been at work with the suspension. ...most likely slammed/scraped and then dubiously unpimped....still better shedtastic unmolested examples of this out there surely?.....like most Citroëns of this era if you got a good un then they were generally ok....if you got a bad one........

bennyboydurham

1,617 posts

175 months

Saturday 11th March 2017
quotequote all
These cars (the boggo version anyhow, never drove the cooking ones) had terrible brakes. Like 'oh I need to brake,BRAKE, BRAAAAKE' kind of brakes.

lucido grigio

44,044 posts

164 months

Saturday 11th March 2017
quotequote all
HardMiles said:
probably chalk said:
I can't think of anything to say.
This is brilliant, quite possibly the best response I've read on a fiverum ever!!!!
"Fiverum " ?

Do you holiday in Elevenerife ?.....confusedbiggrin

Horrid fragile shed BTW.

Brompty

153 posts

145 months

Saturday 11th March 2017
quotequote all
white_goodman said:
So this or last week's pristine Escort Encore? wink
I think I'd rather walk...

BFleming

3,618 posts

144 months

Saturday 11th March 2017
quotequote all
Brompty said:
white_goodman said:
So this or last week's pristine Escort Encore? wink
I think I'd rather walk...
I'm sure a rusty floorpan would allow you to do both.