Being charged for not moving (Permit absurdity)

Being charged for not moving (Permit absurdity)

Author
Discussion

Ahbefive

11,657 posts

174 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
Bruce Fielding said:
Plug Life said:
I hate diesel and proud of it.™
Why?

On average, engines that run on diesel accelerate faster than petrol (more torque).

They last longer overall life.

They go further per litre

They pollute about the same overall (less refining process).

What's not to like?
Surely you don't belive what you wrote there? Its all wrong except your 3rd point.

Also saying Camden is the best place to live is hilarious. Good one, very funny. thumbup

SarGara

365 posts

178 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
Thank-you OP for opening my eyes to what a Corbyn lead future would entail, sorry you have to suffer through it (unless you voted for them, in that case take your medicine)

psi310398

9,258 posts

205 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
Camden Council is the price you have to pay for living amongst a bunch of virtue signalling luvvies and sundry other pillocks who elsewhere would probably vote Tory. It is a one party state with no fear of competition and is lazy, inefficient and unaccountable as a result. The best path to peace and sanity around here is to engage as little as possible with them.

OP, I wouldn't waste your time complaining - the Council won't listen, whichever party your ward councillors belong to. It hates all motorists and wants us on bicycles (presumably in Mao jackets).

I have had my run-ins with the Council because they object to my rotating my seven cars on my resident's permit, even though there is nothing in the regulations to stop me.

The official I was dealing with assumed I was a car dealer, selling off the street, and told me that my permit was being revoked without even contacting me beforehand to ascertain the facts. He panicked a bit when I contacted him to suggest that he familiarise himself with the concept of judicial review. Last I heard from the bugger.


Paul O

2,746 posts

185 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
NickCQ said:
Lee540 said:
AyBee said:
how else do you suggest they do it (Camden congestion zone? scratchchin)?
Get rid of buses..
And hope that none of the current bus users will use their cars for the same journey?
Aren't London buses slowly being replaced by eco fuels? I'm sure I saw a few when I was last there. Either leccy or Hydro, can't remember which.

LarsG

991 posts

77 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
Live in a Leftie Liberal controlled area expect laws to be made by people not because they are necessary, but because they can and they don't give a damn.

LarsG

991 posts

77 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
Bruce Fielding said:
Just bought a new smoker, and Camden have decided in their wisdom to charge me an extra £61 a year for parking a diesel outside my gaff.

That's PARKING.

Not driving.

Not burning fuel.

Not polluting what is already the most polluted council in London thanks to TFL and delivery drivers.

Why on earth should I pay more money for not operating my car than my neighbour with a hybrid for not operating their car?

Parking permits have to be about space on the road, not about emissions, surely?

Is this insane or is it just me?

Anyone else suffering this?

What can be done?
You have to understand that once you enter the world of Liberal Leftie Control you resign your rights and your money to their back pocket. They will do with you what they please, if you object they will shout you down and accuse you of being a "nasty polluter who cares not for the small children around you evil doer". They will strip you of your had earned for their won benefit and will introduce laws not because they are necessary, but because they can.

Negotiation on this will get you as far as you would if you said No to the Borg.

AC43

11,575 posts

210 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
LarsG said:
Bruce Fielding said:
Just bought a new smoker, and Camden have decided in their wisdom to charge me an extra £61 a year for parking a diesel outside my gaff.

That's PARKING.

Not driving.

Not burning fuel.

Not polluting what is already the most polluted council in London thanks to TFL and delivery drivers.

Why on earth should I pay more money for not operating my car than my neighbour with a hybrid for not operating their car?

Parking permits have to be about space on the road, not about emissions, surely?

Is this insane or is it just me?

Anyone else suffering this?

What can be done?
You have to understand that once you enter the world of Liberal Leftie Control you resign your rights and your money to their back pocket. They will do with you what they please, if you object they will shout you down and accuse you of being a "nasty polluter who cares not for the small children around you evil doer". They will strip you of your had earned for their won benefit and will introduce laws not because they are necessary, but because they can.

Negotiation on this will get you as far as you would if you said No to the Borg.
Or you could just get a petrol which is much more suited to city use.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

128 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
AC43 said:
Or you could just get a bus which is much more suited to city use.
Yup.

Unbusy

934 posts

99 months

Thursday 22nd March 2018
quotequote all
Japanese knotweed Is more polite!

LarsG

991 posts

77 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
AC43 said:
Or you could just get a petrol which is much more suited to city use.
Until the council decide that you can only have an electric car.

AC43

11,575 posts

210 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
LarsG said:
AC43 said:
Or you could just get a petrol which is much more suited to city use.
Until the council decide that you can only have an electric car.
That's a while yet. I just vote we get rid of the worst offenders first.



V8RX7

26,990 posts

265 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
Bruce Fielding said:
I have no objection to paying extra for driving a polluting vehicle through a city.

What I am miffed about is being charged for NOT driving it.
That's long been Gov't policy

I have at least 3 cars taxed at any one time

I can only drive one at a time and I cover less than 10k in all 3.

banghead


99dndd

2,116 posts

91 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
Bruce Fielding said:
Why?

On average, engines that run on diesel accelerate faster than petrol (more torque).

They last longer overall life.

They go further per litre

They pollute about the same overall (less refining process).

What's not to like?
Yes, but:

Petrol cars produce CO2 and melt the polar bears' igloos. There are no polar bears in Camden.

Electric cars carve up vast amount of Canadian countryside for Lithium mines and the shipping processes involved dump exhaust into the world's oceans. There are neither Lithium mines nor oceans in Camden.

Diesel cars produce NOX particles and low level pollutants that harm people breathing in the local area. There are lots of people breathing in Camden.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

128 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
99dndd said:
There are no polar bears in Camden.
Not even at London Zoo?

99dndd

2,116 posts

91 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Not even at London Zoo?
It's just outside the boundary isn't it?

Countdown

40,247 posts

198 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
Bruce Fielding said:
I have no objection to paying extra for driving a polluting vehicle through a city.

What I am miffed about is being charged for NOT driving it.
You're not being charged for "NOT driving it". You're being charged for PARKING it. That's why it's called a Parking Permit.

smile

donkmeister

8,406 posts

102 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
OP I feel your pain, and from having spent more time in Camden than is healthy for one of sound mind I agree your council is one of those more effective at forcing their will on those they serve.
But, this is similar to all the other inequities in motoring:
VED (or whatever it's called now) ranges from FA to £500+, even £1k for a new car, regardless of how many miles the car does or how much space it takes up on the road even if it hardly ever turns a wheel and gets parked off road. Apparently, it's all down to pollution when it IS running. Even though we already pay for THAT by virtue of the tax on the fuel we use doing x miles at y mpg, and the VAT on the tyres and other consumables, and the income tax we are paying with the money earned from getting stuff done (regardless of whether you are driving on business or just commuting to your place of work).
In fairness to the Soviet Camden Republic, you have viable alternatives such as public transport, taxis, car clubs, walking (disappointed people in Camden don't all do the Madness walk).
Out here in the sticks many have limited or zero alternative smile

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

128 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
donkmeister said:
But, this is similar to all the other inequities in motoring:
VED (or whatever it's called now) ranges from FA to £500+, even £1k for a new car
Yeh, it used to be like that for a dozen years, for cars new from 2006 to 2017.

It's actually a lot flatter for cars new in the last year - after the first tax for a new car (£0-£2k), it's £140 for everything petrol or diesel (inc hybrid), £0 for electric-only, plus an additional £310 for the first five years for anything list price of £40k+, even electric.

So a 1yo Ferrari? £450. A 1yo Tesla? £310. A 1yo Fiesta? £140. Does that make you happier?

Fastdruid

8,718 posts

154 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
Bruce Fielding said:
Plug Life said:
I hate diesel and proud of it.™
Why?
Smell, noise, the way they make their power, the lag and the extra weight for a start. I hate them and would never willingly have one.

Bruce Fielding said:
On average, engines that run on diesel accelerate faster than petrol (more torque).
There is this funny thing called a gearbox. Diesels have to be geared higher...which means when you're comparing relatively equivalent petrol and diesel cars that outside of 1st gear the petrol can be making more torque at the wheels for any given speed.

LarsG

991 posts

77 months

Friday 23rd March 2018
quotequote all
AC43 said:
LarsG said:
AC43 said:
Or you could just get a petrol which is much more suited to city use.
Until the council decide that you can only have an electric car.
That's a while yet. I just vote we get rid of the worst offenders first.
It's Camden, anything more than a two wheeled cycle will be penalised.