RE: Audi A4 (B7) Avant S Line | Shed of the Week

RE: Audi A4 (B7) Avant S Line | Shed of the Week

Author
Discussion

Wren-went

809 posts

39 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
Never owned a B7 but owned a B5 N reg 1.8T sport Avant which when I bought it at 14 months old it was just under 80,000 , sold it to someone at work and over 20 years later his Dad owns it.

After the B5 followed a B6 52 plate 1.8T 180 + S-line Avant which was about 2 years old kept that about 5 years and have never owned an Audi since but both cars were faultless but should be when bought under 3 years old.

This looks great for the mileage but at that mileage it has to be a keeper who's going to want it when it has 200,000 + I wouldn't.

JJJ.

1,388 posts

16 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
Not even with somebody else's money!

richinlondon

600 posts

123 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
I know Audi get some stick on here for various reasons, but take a step back from the ire, which in a lot of cases is more about a certain percentage of the owners, they do make a damn fine motor.

Credit where it is due, this is 17 years old and looks really good, like it has plenty of life left in it.

I remember years ago I had a new gen Saab 9-3 Aero, my mate got a 2.0 diesel A4 Avant at the same time (also in black) and my first abiding memory of it was the utter gulf, nay chasm in interior quality, the Saab was to be honest like cracker toy quality and the Audi just felt like it would be around forever. The second abiding memory is the horrendous rubbery, chemical smell from the floor mats he bought for it, no matter what he did they just kept leeching this toxic aroma that was bad enough to need the windows cracked lest you passed out. It was strange as I got some work shoes from TK Maxx at the same time and they had the exact same smell, think it was stuff made in India from chemical spill mop ups.

My last Audi was a badly neglected disaster of a Mk1 TT, bought in haste as I liked the wheel/paint combo but that had the same feeling, even if it was always breaking.

Get one that hasnt been neglected, keep on top of it and could last decades. I had a 100 in the early 90s, was my first introduction to cars not rusting, was like witchcraft at the time.


Good shed.
SOrry off topic, but interesting comment about the saab, I had a 2000 Saab 9-3 convertible and 'upgraded' to a 2008 which was so poorly built in comparison, I got rid of quickly and went back to old model 2002 year and much better.



cnut

143 posts

188 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
I had an end of line B6 130 TDI Sport which I think is a better looker compared to the B7. Great but ultimately dull car to drive, the rock hard ride coupled with the woolly steering was a strange sensation but the engine was bomb proof and when remapped really went quite well.


Cannyjock

57 posts

55 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
'Since the postmistress bought an A1, Shed himself has been able to carry out plenty of private VAG servicing in his village workshop and he is also perfectly happy to use the tradesman’s entrance when the situation demands it for his own vehicles.'

Genius :-)

Good shed BTW, especially with towbar

Water Fairy

5,528 posts

156 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
richinlondon said:
SOrry off topic, but interesting comment about the saab, I had a 2000 Saab 9-3 convertible and 'upgraded' to a 2008 which was so poorly built in comparison, I got rid of quickly and went back to old model 2002 year and much better.
I can relate that having had a 1996 900, 2001 9-3, then 2003 9-3, back to 2001 9-3 then a disaster of a 2004 9-3

carinaman

21,371 posts

173 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
The B6 owners I knew ran an SE and a Sport. One of them opined that the SE rode better. Besides the suspension differences I think the SE had smaller wheels and taller tyres.

Resolutionary

1,269 posts

172 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
fantheman80 said:
Not a DTM but has the DTM wheels no?
They were found on both the DTM and special edition, which this looks like.

I shopped for a Quattro version of these some years back, at anywhere between £4-6k dependent on condition and spec. Ended up with a 3.2 V6 Avant and the build quality definitely felt solid, my mate still has my old one and its pushing over 150k miles now.

Great shed to be honest.

molineux1980

1,204 posts

220 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
I've been pondering an estate as an mtb wagon, I love my Swift Sport but it's very tight for space. This looks a cracker.

S600BSB

5,082 posts

107 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
Great car, great shed.

Abdul Abulbul Amir

13,179 posts

213 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
What The Deuces said:
bmv6197 said:
So that probably just means it wasn’t an EA888 phase II then… They switched to heavier piston rings with the phase III variant.


It was a 2006. It was a flipping good car to be fair.
That'll be an EA113 engine then.

I quite fancy getting a gen 3 TT...does anyone know if they used gen2 or gen3 EA888s?

CDP

7,467 posts

255 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
I'm surprised the A6 is considered small. If I were looking for a car I'd certainly look at this.

bmv6197

78 posts

104 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
Abdul Abulbul Amir said:
What The Deuces said:
bmv6197 said:
So that probably just means it wasn’t an EA888 phase II then… They switched to heavier piston rings with the phase III variant.


It was a 2006. It was a flipping good car to be fair.
That'll be an EA113 engine then.

I quite fancy getting a gen 3 TT...does anyone know if they used gen2 or gen3 EA888s?
I don’t think the TT Mk3 came out until 2014/15, so probably well beyond the switchover to the later engine which for most VAG models in 2012. Your safest bet would be to check the engine code against the list I posted.

Mr Tidy

22,684 posts

128 months

Friday 8th September 2023
quotequote all
That looks too smart to be a Shed!

But I'm not sure I'd want to risk a 4 cylinder petrol with nearly 150K miles on it.

AlmondGreen

60 posts

54 months

Saturday 9th September 2023
quotequote all
The interior is in remarkable condition given its age and mileage. And all the better for having buttons with no touchscreen in sight. Exterior seems good too. One of the best sheds in a while?

wiliferus

4,071 posts

199 months

Saturday 9th September 2023
quotequote all
It’s a tfsi 220 smile

Nice shed, seems a lot of car for the money as long as there’s no impeding doom lingering.


James76G

350 posts

185 months

Saturday 9th September 2023
quotequote all
I've run a late model B6 for the last three years and been very pleased with it. Although it's 20 years old it still feels like a modern car (touchscreens aside) where as my E36 feels ancient, despite there being only 10 years between them. Something happened in the late 90s that really improved cars (fit and finish and focus on NVH probably) and I'd have no issues taking the Audi anywhere and everywhere.



Interestingly that 2.0l engine in this B7 gives exactly the same power as the 3.0l V6 in mine but I imagine they deliver that power very differently.

nismo48

3,824 posts

208 months

Saturday 9th September 2023
quotequote all
That's a great shed, good value for money

Magikarp

804 posts

49 months

Saturday 9th September 2023
quotequote all
Juvenile, even for shed.

J4CKO

41,757 posts

201 months

Saturday 9th September 2023
quotequote all
richinlondon said:
J4CKO said:
I know Audi get some stick on here for various reasons, but take a step back from the ire, which in a lot of cases is more about a certain percentage of the owners, they do make a damn fine motor.

Credit where it is due, this is 17 years old and looks really good, like it has plenty of life left in it.

I remember years ago I had a new gen Saab 9-3 Aero, my mate got a 2.0 diesel A4 Avant at the same time (also in black) and my first abiding memory of it was the utter gulf, nay chasm in interior quality, the Saab was to be honest like cracker toy quality and the Audi just felt like it would be around forever. The second abiding memory is the horrendous rubbery, chemical smell from the floor mats he bought for it, no matter what he did they just kept leeching this toxic aroma that was bad enough to need the windows cracked lest you passed out. It was strange as I got some work shoes from TK Maxx at the same time and they had the exact same smell, think it was stuff made in India from chemical spill mop ups.

My last Audi was a badly neglected disaster of a Mk1 TT, bought in haste as I liked the wheel/paint combo but that had the same feeling, even if it was always breaking.

Get one that hasnt been neglected, keep on top of it and could last decades. I had a 100 in the early 90s, was my first introduction to cars not rusting, was like witchcraft at the time.


Good shed.
SOrry off topic, but interesting comment about the saab, I had a 2000 Saab 9-3 convertible and 'upgraded' to a 2008 which was so poorly built in comparison, I got rid of quickly and went back to old model 2002 year and much better.
Would agree, I had a 2001 model and preferred it, interior was more old fashioned but definitely seemed better, the later NG's were better than the first ones, so thats how bad the 2003 one was, CD changer conked out, the coatings came off the buttons, the interior creaked, rattled and bits fell off. Didnt help it being an Aero with its really harsh suspension, the cooking versions were nicer to be in.

It was so far off the Audi, it was laughable, but the actual body and mechanicals were pretty solid to be fair