The worst car you've ever driven...

The worst car you've ever driven...

Author
Discussion

Long Drax

744 posts

172 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Austin Maxi 1750HL. Hated every moment of the few months I owned the thing in 1981. It had no redeeming features and felt like you were driving a bus. A totally uncool vehicle for a 20y/o lad to be seen at the wheel of.

And thirty-six years on - I think I would feel pretty cool driving one around town today. Oh dear. Nurse! NURSE!...





HannsG

3,060 posts

136 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Chrysler Sebring..... Shocking build quality and driving ability. The petrol cap fell off in my hand.

Car had 2,000 miles on it as a rental.

Put me off American cars for life.

Oldwolf

961 posts

195 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
FSO Polonez

We can close the thread now, it was worse than Skoda Estelle or Lada Niva or non-turbo diesel Nissan Bluebird in hearing aid beige <Shudder>

JimbobVFR

2,696 posts

146 months

Wednesday 15th November 2017
quotequote all
Oldwolf said:
FSO Polonez

We can close the thread now
I strongly disagree, I've driven both a Polonez and a Dacia, the Dacia was worse.

cvms

22 posts

103 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Nissan Serena, circa 1995MY.... Truly awful vehicle... You couldn't call it a car, you couldn't call it a van with windows as it was more agricultural than that. Even 20 years on I shudder as to how awful it was...

Muddle238

3,942 posts

115 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Likeomg said:
Probably one of my series land rover's

atrocious to drive; noisy, slow, brakes... sometimes, about 12-15mpg

But the feeling you get from them is amazing as long as your not going too far.. or on roads with a speed limit more than 40.

they are contagious, we now have a collection of 8 classic LR's!!
I'm inclined to agree. My 1962 SIIa 109 has the turning circle of a Maersk supertanker, and tight slow speed maneuovering is a gym workout in its own right.

Get it "up to speed" and you'll be deafened while slowly being poisoned by a medley of fumes, in conjunction with every bone in your body being rattled like a toddlers toy. When you've had enough of that, trying to stop is yet another event that you'll probably end up being killed to death doing.

However it is brilliant fun and I can never see myself selling it. Besides, it's still earning it's living!

Cobnapint

8,650 posts

153 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Back in 1983 I think it was, my girlfriend at the time's dad bought a brand spanking FSO Polonez.

He let me drive it. My god. Even back then it was fking ste. It sounded like a machine gun when starting it, and the rear parcel shelf, fk me, was made of metal - it weighed a ton!

Cobnapint

8,650 posts

153 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Howard- said:
Peugeot 206. Awful thing. Truly crap cars. I don't know why they're so common.
Agree on that. Sold on the looks alone I think. I drove one once and the driving position was bloody awful. Everything about it was wrong.

Cobnapint

8,650 posts

153 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Had a drive of a light blue Triumph Herald that the girlfriends grandma wouldn't sell back in the early eighties.

With 4 up, we went out into the fens around Spalding one afternoon and I can honestly say it was one of the most unnerving motoring experiences I've ever had. Those things weren't safe.

Saying it handled like a boat would be insulting to boats. And the brakes made it go faster! Bloody death traps.

coppice

8,709 posts

146 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
The Herald actually drove pretty well by the standards of the period . Snappy, short shift gearchange (especially if synchro was present and correct, which it often wasn't and ISTR was never on first) , astonishing turning circle , peppy little engine (not quick but willing ) and great steering - which you really , really needed to apply the ..ahem dab of oppo (more like armful than dab ) which was required if you were daft enough to lift off mid corner when pressing on (I speak in a relative sense - 80mph flat out)

But there were far, far worse cars around then .

keeef

344 posts

164 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Long Drax said:
Austin Maxi 1750HL. Hated every moment of the few months I owned the thing in 1981.
I've actually got two!

Ones a bog standard 1750, but the over is a twin carb 1750 HLS. smile


techguyone

3,137 posts

144 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
cvms said:
Nissan Serena, circa 1995MY.... Truly awful vehicle... You couldn't call it a car, you couldn't call it a van with windows as it was more agricultural than that. Even 20 years on I shudder as to how awful it was...
I hired one of those one time for a holiday, mine was petrol and it was ok, not 'I want to buy one ok' but I don't recall it being especially ste, it had two sunroofs and was mid engined if I recall right, went ok.

GiveItSomeWellie

3,013 posts

198 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Vauxhall Corsa B, 1.2.

Apart from the fact it had a good heater and didn't leak when it rained, it did not have a single redeeming feature.

Byker28i

61,764 posts

219 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Easy, was also the worse car I've ever owned.

A montego countryman in gold, with beige interior. Imaginge if you can, a friday car, built by Austin Rover when they weren't on strike. We bought it as my wife was a childminder at the time and fancied the 7 seats (pop up seats in the boot)

Made up of whatever bits they could be bothered putting into the car from across the ranges. Engine from a Maestro with a sump from something else, wiper motor mechanism that had 7 varients, bolts and screws missing from everything. Gutless performance, unreliable piece of st that kept overheating, understeered terribly around corners. In the end she tried to kill it by driving it 30 miles at speed whilst overheating to pick the kids up from school.
I got a phone call as the headmaster was covering the engine with a fire extinguisher whilst getting the fire brigade there as it was smoking heavily.
We scrapped it/traded it in as the head had warped and saw it on fire on the M4 two weeks later. Looks like someone tried to bodge it back together and failed dismally. "please just let it burn to nothing" said my wife as we drove past. A fitting end to a dreadful car


JacobsCracker

32 posts

81 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
17 plate Fiat Tipo hire car before my new company car was delivered.

Hateful thing, 1.4 N/A engine struggled everywhere and anywhere, 46mph up Telegraph hill (Exeter).

The gearbox was also extremely odd, it was way to light moving the lever with no feedback as to if you had selected a gear or not.

Only thing it had going was a humongous boot for a car thst size. 10/10 would not buy.

Christmassss

650 posts

91 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
1999 Hyundai Lantra 1.6i

God awful car in every possible way. Slow, poorly built, terrible handling. I got it for free as the person trying to sell it couldn't get rid....even at £200! Says it all really.

Mike335i

5,060 posts

104 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
Had a 17 plate Giulietta? Today. In a word, awful. I can't imagine anyone taking that for test drive and thinking "yes, yes this'll do".

It rode quite nicely and it looks ok. That was about it. The headlamps were like candles and the high beam literally felt like you were shining a torch out the window.

Clutch felt like it was set in a bucket of stodge and the brakes...my word. Theres like a half foot of pedal travel where absolutely nothing happens and then you transition into emergency braking.

I can't believe someone signed that off. The 5 inch infotainment system was super low rent.

The engine (I guess a 1.4 multiair turbo) was ok. Bit weak in "natural" mode but quite chirpy in "dynamic". Thirsty though. Handling was quite inert, it went where you pointed it I suppose.
All very subjective though. The brakes are something you would get used to, the clutch is the same, the handling is probably the same as any other European hatchback (and actually in line with continental tastes, if not British), the headlights are probably perfectly serviceable but not xenon / led quality so pant in comparison and the engine is a peach for what it is.

I think something not being liked is now automatically equated to terrible and it just isn't. Go drive a similar spec Peugeot, Hyundai, Kia or Vauxhall and tell me they are really that different.

Flibble

6,477 posts

183 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Byker28i said:
Easy, was also the worse car I've ever owned.

A montego countryman in gold, with beige interior. Imaginge if you can, a friday car, built by Austin Rover when they weren't on strike. We bought it as my wife was a childminder at the time and fancied the 7 seats (pop up seats in the boot)

Made up of whatever bits they could be bothered putting into the car from across the ranges. Engine from a Maestro with a sump from something else, wiper motor mechanism that had 7 varients, bolts and screws missing from everything. Gutless performance, unreliable piece of st that kept overheating, understeered terribly around corners. In the end she tried to kill it by driving it 30 miles at speed whilst overheating to pick the kids up from school.
I got a phone call as the headmaster was covering the engine with a fire extinguisher whilst getting the fire brigade there as it was smoking heavily.
We scrapped it/traded it in as the head had warped and saw it on fire on the M4 two weeks later. Looks like someone tried to bodge it back together and failed dismally. "please just let it burn to nothing" said my wife as we drove past. A fitting end to a dreadful car
My mum had a Montego estate when I was a lad. It ended up in a DC central reservation after someone merged into the side of her from a slip road. She didn't seem bothered by its loss.

Limpet

6,370 posts

163 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
mk5 Escort 1.4 LX. One of the few cars I've ever driven that even rose tints don't give one redeeming feature to. Terrible combination of gutless performance, and that grotty old CVH engine that had the dash plastics, pedals, (and your fillings) vibrating horribly past 4,000 RPM. Heavy steering with 4 turns lock to lock, awful flat, hard seats, nasty plastics, and bland styling. Everything you touched felt brittle, cheap and nasty. I can't believe anyone spending their own money ever bought one of these if they'd even looked at anything else.

What Ford achieved with the XR3i and RS2000 from the foundations of this turd, was little short of remarkable. In fact, the RS2000 was a bit of a gem, I thought.

s m

23,340 posts

205 months

Thursday 16th November 2017
quotequote all
Limpet said:
mk5 Escort 1.4 LX. One of the few cars I've ever driven that even rose tints don't give one redeeming feature to. Terrible combination of gutless performance, and that grotty old CVH engine that had the dash plastics, pedals, (and your fillings) vibrating horribly past 4,000 RPM. Heavy steering with 4 turns lock to lock, awful flat, hard seats, nasty plastics, and bland styling. Everything you touched felt brittle, cheap and nasty. I can't believe anyone spending their own money ever bought one of these if they'd even looked at anything else.

What Ford achieved with the XR3i and RS2000 from the foundations of this turd, was little short of remarkable. In fact, the RS2000 was a bit of a gem, I thought.
Richard Parry-Jones got involved with the mk5 re-hash