RE: Toyota GT 86: £24,995

RE: Toyota GT 86: £24,995

Author
Discussion

LuS1fer

41,192 posts

247 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Polrules said:
LuS1fer said:
What are the relative VED rates and servicing costs for the Toybaru and 370Z though?
Fair point on the servicing - don't know what the Toyota will be but when I had my 350Z it cost less than £200 for a service at Nissan. Difference in VED will be around £200 annually - or 2 tanks of fuel. Not really enough to put me off a car at this price.
The trouble is it does put me off because I don't get two tanks of fuel, it's like burning money or being forced to pay a fixed penalty for having a nice car. Plus the Toybaru is going to have better fuel consumption across the board I would imagine (not always true, I know).

That said, I'd still never buy a diesel for cheap VED if that were the only alternative.

Fittster

20,120 posts

215 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Polrules said:
Fittster said:
Can you explain why you are comparing the Toyota with a car with a purchase price that is 20% higher?
By the time you've added a few options I imagine you'll be very close to the price you would have to pay to get into a 370Z. Let's face it - Nissan dealers are not exactly beating punters off with a stick, at first glance it's 20% more expensive but I'd argue it's more than 20% better.
Comparing discounted prices against list is a bit unfair, maybe Toyota will discount.

The reason why Nissan have been forced to discount is largely because of the running costs of the 370Z. The Nissan has a large engine, in a heavier car which means it's likely to use more fuel and will attract a greater tax bill. We don't live in a world where people on moderate incomes are willing to tolerate high running costs.

The Toyota is designed to offer a reasonable attractive driving package (low weight, rwd layout) with acceptable running costs (2.0 engine). Sure there are plenty of ways of going faster than a diesel Audi A5s but it's relatively difficult to think of another new car that offers the promise of driving pleasure thae Toyota does. The alternatives are either FWD hatchbacks of more expensive/higher running costs coupes of which the 370Z is one.

Toyota has aimed for a sweet spot in the market (which lots of PHers have been calling for) and I think they have pretty much hit it.

braddo

10,705 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
ED209 said:
My main concern was practicality but i didnt think i could spell it so missed it off my original post. The toyota will suffer the same fate.
Fair enough laugh

But by 'same fate' you think this car will sell as poorly as the 370Z? It's a very different car, I'd say - a lot cheaper to buy and run (esp. to run as a company car), +2 seats, less ugly, the latest kid on the block, lighter on its feet, younger image, ready to be 'modded' etc.

Krikkit

26,681 posts

183 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Lusifer that's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Not getting a significantly better car for £200/year is mad.

bennyboysvuk

3,491 posts

250 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
Well priced and hope it sells all they can make.

But of course it needs 300bhp, bigger wheels, better tyres, should weigh less than 750kg and cost £15k laugh
EFA
smile

Chrisw666

22,655 posts

201 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Lusifer that's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Not getting a significantly better car for £200/year is mad.
You've driven both to know that one is better then?

Just because something has a bigger engine and more power doesn't automatically qualify it for better status.


Fittster

20,120 posts

215 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Lusifer that's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Not getting a significantly better car for £200/year is mad.
You think the difference in running costs between the two cars over, say 12,000 miles per yea will be £200?

DanDC5

18,868 posts

169 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Lusifer that's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Not getting a significantly better car for £200/year is mad.
But by the time you've put fuel in it and ran it for the year it's a lot more than £200....

elementad

625 posts

152 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
My 370z cost £164 for its service at the Nissan high performance dealership.
If your on motorway you'll EASILY get over 30mpg if not more.
Tax out the showroom is over £700 but that's one off. After that it's £400 per year.
Tootling around town and blasting through country roads and the mpg will be in the teens, but I don't give a st because it sounds like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAaZ-4Uq570&fea...

This Toyota is nice but different market for sure

otolith

56,858 posts

206 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
PHer's ideas on what cars should cost and what constitutes value never cease to amaze me. Quite bizarre.

LouD86

3,281 posts

155 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
What are the relative VED rates and servicing costs for the Toybaru and 370Z though?
GT86;
Yearly - £165
Combined MPG - 42mpg

370z;
Yearly - £435
Combined MPG - 26mpg


12gauge

1,274 posts

176 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Harris328i said:
Hmm. Any idea on the JDM price out of curiosity?
From 1,990,000yen (1,990,000.00 JPY = 16,488.22 GBP)
http://toyota.jp/86/001_p_001/grade/index.html

No idea how much (if any) Sales tax that includes. IIRC you have to add 10% EU duty to that price then 20% UK VAT, so maybe not that much cheaper there.

I remember when i first started using the internet back around 1998 comparing rip off Britain prices with other countries. Back then a new Lexus RX300 cost £30k in the UK £20k in the US ($30k) and £10k in Japan! Pound a lot weaker now (and Lexus were branded as Toyota in Japan and the RX marketed as a MPV rather than a SUV in its domestic market) . But generally the Japan price was usually 1/2 of the UK price.

braddo

10,705 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
I fully expect the next 'surprise' after the £25k price announcement is that when a properly timed 0-60mph is done it will be comfortably under 7 seconds ('comfortably' for Top Trumps purposes - say the region of 6.3-6.7 secs).


s m

23,341 posts

205 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
PHer's ideas on what cars should cost and what constitutes value never cease to amaze me. Quite bizarre.
No new car should ever cost more than a faster second-hand car.

No second hand car should ever cost more than what they consider to be the going price.

No one should buy a new car if the poster would not entertain buying it themselves.........

LouD86

3,281 posts

155 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Oh, and the options on the UK spec car. Well its a huge list

Metallic Paint
Leather Interior
6spd Automatic Gearbox

And thats it. Everything else is standard!!

Chrisw666

22,655 posts

201 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
s m said:
No new car should ever cost more than a faster second-hand car.

No second hand car should ever cost more than what they consider to be the going price.

No one should buy a new car if the poster would not entertain buying it themselves.........
I think that applies to the internet in many forms.

I can't afford a GT86, if I could I'd probably buy something else because I'd want that something else more.

But it doesn't seem expensive when compared to the list prices of things like a Focus, Golf, Astra etc that doesn't have sporting pretensions.

Krikkit

26,681 posts

183 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Chrisw666 said:
Krikkit said:
Lusifer that's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Not getting a significantly better car for £200/year is mad.
You've driven both to know that one is better then?

Just because something has a bigger engine and more power doesn't automatically qualify it for better status.
Alright, chill out now. I was obviously far too vague with that statement.

Just to make my opinions clear: The Toyobaru sounds like one of the most interesting mainstream cars to come along for years; I think it'll probably be worth the £25k asking price, and certainly be a good used buy once the dealer tax has been wiped off. I'm certainly looking forward to testing out a BRZ.

What I'm saying is that not buying a car because of £200/year VED is crazy, especially on nearly-new vehicles where depreciation wipes that out several more times. On a car where values have stabilised, it makes more sense to me, but on a 2 y/o car or newer it's crazy talk.

DanDC5

18,868 posts

169 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
LouD86 said:
Oh, and the options on the UK spec car. Well its a huge list

Metallic Paint
Leather Interior
6spd Automatic Gearbox

And thats it. Everything else is standard!!
Of those I'd possibly go for Metallic paint, wouldn't want leather and an auto box in this car is just pointless.

Fittster

20,120 posts

215 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
LouD86 said:
LuS1fer said:
What are the relative VED rates and servicing costs for the Toybaru and 370Z though?
GT86;
Yearly - £165
Combined MPG - 42mpg

370z;
Yearly - £435
Combined MPG - 26mpg
So over 12,000 miles running on Super unleaded at 142.0p

Toyota: £1,844.41
Nissan: £2,979.44

Over the year the Nissan will cost you an extra £1135.03 in fuel

Chrisw666

22,655 posts

201 months

Friday 3rd February 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
What I'm saying is that not buying a car because of £200/year VED is crazy, especially on nearly-new vehicles where depreciation wipes that out several more times. On a car where values have stabilised, it makes more sense to me, but on a 2 y/o car or newer it's crazy talk.
How do cars become 2 years old though?

I've just spent a grand on a Puma, some idiot bought it new, the previous idiot bought it for more than me and spent much more than I have paid keeping it fighting fit over a few years, I've got a good car but couldn't have done that if someone hadn't shelled out.