Your 0-60 times

Author
Discussion

twazzock

1,930 posts

171 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
13 seconds allegedly, but I doubt it's ever come close to that. Suck on that you shlags.

Bolognese

1,500 posts

226 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
4.9 seconds. Verified on a dyno.

Vladimir

6,917 posts

160 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
5.8 for BMW, 12.8 (not confirmed!) for the 2.5 tonne van!!

iiyama

2,201 posts

203 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
On a good day, with heat in the tyre's, dry road and a perfect launch...3ish secs. Engine is making 189bhp, (verified not a guestimate!), car weighs 580Kg's with a full tank and me in it and the final drive is a little on the low side hence the acceleration. Top end is lowish though, bounces off the limiter in 6th at 130mph. Gearbox is sequential and there is electronic gizmos to give clutchless up and down shifts.

Should be enough information there! wink

superman84

772 posts

167 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Officially the evo is 3.9 but never tested

TameRacingDriver

18,156 posts

274 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
The only time I've ever had a 0-60 timed properly (not by a stopwatch) it was 5.7 seconds in an E36 328 Sport. Was pretty pleased with that, given it was my first proper quarter mile race biggrin

In fairness, I got the rather brutal launch absolutely spot on, and the conditions (i.e. air temperature, humidity etc) were perfect for the run. I doubt very much it did the clutch any good, though.

Current car (1.8 MK1 MX5) probably about 8.5ish I'd guess.

V8LM

5,179 posts

211 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Bolognese said:
Verified on a dyno.
Eh? You win.

OdramaSwimLaden

1,971 posts

171 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
My car has so much power and grip, if I pointed it East and did a full bore start, you will all find you are going back in tim.....My car has so much power and grip, if I pointed it East and did a full bore start, you will all find you are going back in time.

Monkeylegend

26,678 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
OdramaSwimLaden said:
My car has so much power and grip, if I pointed it East and did a full bore start, you will all find you are going back in tim.....My car has so much power and grip, if I pointed it East and did a full bore start, you will all find you are going back in time.
yad gohdnuorg

Caruso

7,454 posts

258 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Actual recorded times from the Honda.

mph..Sec..G....Ft
10.0 0.98 0.71 5
20.0 1.54 0.85 17
30.0 2.12 0.76 38
40.0 2.73 0.72 70
50.0 3.26 0.85 105
60.0 3.80 0.83 149
70.0 4.71 0.64 236
80.0 5.37 0.67 309
90.0 6.15 0.53 406
100.0 7.43 0.46 585

Dave Hedgehog

14,646 posts

206 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
my golf 3.7

swifthobo

869 posts

172 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
suzuki swift 1.3 gti 7.8 smile

LiamM45

1,035 posts

182 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
my old golf vr6 did it in 6 flat, timed at brunters.

the ibiza, not sure but it does 0-100 in under 13.9 seconds, as my best 1/4 mile, in the freezing january was 13.9 @ 103mph.

warmer weather should see mid 5's 0-60 and 0-100 closer to 13 flat.

bigger turbo soon so with some decent grip and the extra 100-120bhp i'd like to crack 0-100 in twelve seconds.

Sam_68

9,939 posts

247 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
iiyama said:
On a good day, with heat in the tyre's, dry road and a perfect launch...3ish secs. Engine is making 189bhp, (verified not a guestimate!), car weighs 580Kg's with a full tank and me in it and the final drive is a little on the low side hence the acceleration. Top end is lowish though, bounces off the limiter in 6th at 130mph. Gearbox is sequential and there is electronic gizmos to give clutchless up and down shifts.

Should be enough information there! wink
Have you actually had it accurately timed though?

Mine for comparison:

Engine making 204bhp, car weighs 429kg with fuel (but excluding driver - say 500-510kg with driver?), similarly low final drive giving 136mph at the limiter, sticky 'track day' tyres (A048's).

Lotus' computers say 3.1 seconds....

Autocar Magazine's timing gear says 3.6 seconds is the best they can manage in practice....

I'm with CraigVmax: everyone who owns a 'Seven' (especially the BEC ones, apparently) can do 3-second 0-60 times... until you actually put them up against accurate timing gear. wink

Motorrad

6,811 posts

189 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
A better thread would you 'Your 0-60 costs'

I'll pitch in at 1/50th of x2 Pirelli 255/50/19, 4mpg, a bit of clutch and a heap of dignity.

CraigVmax

12,248 posts

284 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
The Porsche 993 Turbo 4 was always quoted as (from memory) either 3.7 or 3.9 to 60, seem to recall autocar did it but it a real 6000rpm then sidestep the clutch job

TDutchy

661 posts

197 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
2001 VW Polo 1.0 E - 17.8 seconds.

Do I win?

monthefish

20,449 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
wackojacko said:
CraigVmax said:
I think a lot of people would be surprised how much slower their car is than quoted or they think it is.
I think that depends on the car I question but as a rule of thumb not many cars can achieve the quoted 0-60 say of a set of traffic lights.
..and not many owners would want to, myself included. (Too mechanically sympathetic to subject my p&j to the kind of abuse required to achieve the ultimate '0-60' time)

intrepid44

691 posts

202 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
214 bhp Starlet

Probably a little over 5 seconds, depends on tyres and conditions.

timberman

1,295 posts

217 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
My scirocco managed 6.1 which was a surprise,

only made a couple of attempts so don't know if I could have gone quicker.

C32 averaged about 4.9 after a few mods + 0-100 in around 11.5