RE: You Know You Want To: Morris Minor

RE: You Know You Want To: Morris Minor

Author
Discussion

uncinquesei

917 posts

179 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
I like it in general, but it just sits too low. I think it would look hugely better without the tyres disappearing up inside the arches like a barried E36.
Same here, looks "stanced" as da yout' say... Normalish ride height, set of minilites of a not too outrageous size and it'd be perfect. Oh, except for the headlights, I can't get my hat on with the lower lights of early minors. Morris Thousands look better in my eyes. Love it though, and love the use of Fiat twin cam instead of the usual suspects, RV8, Zetec, K series etc.

jackdebray

53 posts

178 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
ArosaMike said:
It's a race/Hillclimbe car though which means, if it's well sorted which it would appear to be, normal valuation is impossible.
Good luck finding someone in the trade who will come up with a figure anyway near that valuation.

Life Saab Itch

37,068 posts

190 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
jackdebray said:
Good luck finding someone in the trade who will come up with a figure anyway near that valuation.
As has been said; a person could easily spend that on a bare shell restoration, let alone some bespoke high end track modifications to turn it into a competitive hillclimb/sprint car. It also seems to be immaculate. It also is the rarer low-light shape.


A figure of £14K is about right given this example.

jackdebray

53 posts

178 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
Just because this figure has been spent does not mean that you will recoup it come resale time, modifying a car in any fashion seldom adds value and more often than not makes it harder to shift.

EggsBenedict

1,777 posts

176 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
v8will said:
This meets with approval!!

Anyone got a link for the build thread?
yep: http://www.beardmorebros.co.uk/website%20pages/new...

ArosaMike

4,233 posts

213 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
jackdebray said:
Just because this figure has been spent does not mean that you will recoup it come resale time, modifying a car in any fashion seldom adds value and more often than not makes it harder to shift.
I completely agree, but what I was trying to get at is that a cars success and ability as a competition car far outweighs any kind of normal road car valuation. As an example, two or three years ago, one Caterham race car that had won two championships in a row with two different drivers went for £22k....pretty much £1k more than it's 'as new' kit cost!

The original builder of this Minor is a very skilled engineer/fabricator (and a bloody nice guy as it happens), and it shares more in common with a space framed racing car than a Minor. The shell is just a sillouette.

pwrc

2,357 posts

154 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
peterg1955 said:
There's video of this car at Harewood hillclimb

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6OBHu02MKU
phwoar, wouldn't mind seeing it there again

benzito

1,060 posts

161 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
wow, i really really don't want to

ES335

154 posts

168 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
The Reliant Kitten build is amazing - all credit to these guys for genuine "enginuity".

carnut360

127 posts

176 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
its just UGH!!

JMF894

5,539 posts

157 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
All that time, effort and money and only 190bhp?

An opportunity wasted imho

carinaman

21,397 posts

174 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
Isn't it about BHP per ton and how it fucntions rather than a number?

Or are you saying the Fiat Twin Cam was expensive to tune for 190bhp.

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
uncinquesei said:
Mr2Mike said:
I like it in general, but it just sits too low. I think it would look hugely better without the tyres disappearing up inside the arches like a barried E36.
Same here, looks "stanced" as da yout' say... Normalish ride height, set of minilites of a not too outrageous size and it'd be perfect. Oh, except for the headlights, I can't get my hat on with the lower lights of early minors. Morris Thousands look better in my eyes. Love it though, and love the use of Fiat twin cam instead of the usual suspects, RV8, Zetec, K series etc.
In Minor circles, the twink was the usual suspect a few years back...

jackdebray

53 posts

178 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
ArosaMike said:
I completely agree, but what I was trying to get at is that a cars success and ability as a competition car far outweighs any kind of normal road car valuation. As an example, two or three years ago, one Caterham race car that had won two championships in a row with two different drivers went for £22k....pretty much £1k more than it's 'as new' kit cost!

The original builder of this Minor is a very skilled engineer/fabricator (and a bloody nice guy as it happens), and it shares more in common with a space framed racing car than a Minor. The shell is just a sillouette.
No thats a fair point Mike, and I dont doubt it took a lot of time and skill to build and all respect to the fella, I think im just struggling with the price tag on a Morris bodyshell but each to their own.

a11lvj

43 posts

223 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all

Fast Bug

11,792 posts

163 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
Either you get it, or you don't. I don't get people spending silly money on an Audi/BMW/MX5 that looks just like every other Audi/BMW/MX5 that's been made.

And as my Mum always says 'if you've nothing nice to say, say nothing at all' biggrin

itsrodders

212 posts

187 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
I love the Fiat twin cam, having owned longitudinally and transversely mounted, boggo, blown and twinspark versions of it - it's my favourite fourpot (tho I've never owned a BDA...heh).

Mounted into this MM (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Minor#Minor_MM) I cannot think of anything I'd rather jizz fourteen grand on right at this minute - if I had fourteen grand, that is. I don't.

But do I want to? Oh, yes.

Or would I rather sink £14k into a version of my own, based on a complete 4WD Integrale engine/running gear...?

Mmmmm...


v8will

3,301 posts

198 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
markh450 said:
It won't have to pass any approval if it is still registered as a minor, as its pre 1960 then no MOT and I suppose the DVLA doesn't get to find out what mods have been done to the chassis/ engine etc etc?

Looks like there could be a boom in heavily modifying pre 1960's cars soon.

all OK until you crash your carbon fibre bodied, flat plane V8 engined, 200 mph austin 7 into somebody and the insureance start asking questions!!
I meant it meets with my approval, a throwaway thumbs up comment.

I really think a subtle, lightly modded Minor could be alot of fun.

jensenhealey2

162 posts

161 months

Thursday 5th July 2012
quotequote all
Love Minors love this. Carandclassic has three minors on right now at 10k + including a pick=up at close to 14k, so I don't think the price is outrageous for what this is. It will be some-one's cup of tea.

Lets face it the three cylinder Focus elsewhere on PH was over 21k and will lose value like a wardrobe going over a cliff.

MadDog1962

892 posts

164 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Veeayt said:
Everything's perfect about this car. Except for the price frown
I dunno. Like other's have said before me, I totally agree AWESOME :-)

But as for value at 14K? Building it yourself would probably cost a hell of a lot more. Not to mention the hours that have clearly gone in to it.

I reckon that the decision to use a FIAT based engine is pretty brave, but good. I'm guessing it would be a fair bit lighter than a Rover V8 lump, and as it is that Harewood hill climb video seems to indicate it's breaking traction on gearshifts. It sounds terrific too.