RE: Jaguar F-Type V6 S: Driven
Discussion
...i was lucky enough to go on a factory tour yesterday and watched the F types being built. They are expensive but you know the whole damn thing is made of Aluminium, not just panels or bonnet, but as far as i could see, everything. I was also amazed at how many of the process were done by hand.
So, good job and congrats etc to all of Jag's designers and engineers, and props to Ratan T for the finance, faith and vision. "Trebles all round!"
But... I get that the F-type is an alternative to the 911 and Aston Vantage. But, because the V8 F-type clearly also tramples all over the XK's paws, what are Jag's medium- to longterm plans for its product range, especially the XK?
Presumably, the next XK will move up to the c. £90k-£120k bracket to be a Conti-/DB9-type GT?
Or will Jag actually drop the XK, let the F-type coupé/drophead cover its broader customer base, and introduce a sub-£45k 2-seater that'll share its platform with Jag's 3-series rival?
But... I get that the F-type is an alternative to the 911 and Aston Vantage. But, because the V8 F-type clearly also tramples all over the XK's paws, what are Jag's medium- to longterm plans for its product range, especially the XK?
Presumably, the next XK will move up to the c. £90k-£120k bracket to be a Conti-/DB9-type GT?
Or will Jag actually drop the XK, let the F-type coupé/drophead cover its broader customer base, and introduce a sub-£45k 2-seater that'll share its platform with Jag's 3-series rival?
I've been following the F-Type hype very closely for some time but alas have yet to see one in the flesh.
I still honestly think Jaguar dealers will be discounting those list price by a large margin in the not so distant future.
Would love a factory tour and a chance to see all the colours avaiable.
I still honestly think Jaguar dealers will be discounting those list price by a large margin in the not so distant future.
Would love a factory tour and a chance to see all the colours avaiable.
elephantstone said:
I think its safe to say this car has taken the motoring world by a storm. WANT WANT WANT! Ill take an entry level V6, sports exhaust, 18inch wheels, british racing green with red roof and red interior! mmmm!
Here you go:I like the white ones and would wnt red calipers which means bigger wheels needed so I've gone for the style I like best which unfortunately are only available as 20s:
NGK210 said:
So, good job and congrats etc to all of Jag's designers and engineers, and props to Ratan T for the finance, faith and vision. "Trebles all round!"
But... I get that the F-type is an alternative to the 911 and Aston Vantage. But, because the V8 F-type clearly also tramples all over the XK's paws, what are Jag's medium- to longterm plans for its product range, especially the XK?
Presumably, the next XK will move up to the c. £90k-£120k bracket to be a Conti-/DB9-type GT?
Or will Jag actually drop the XK, let the F-type coupé/drophead cover its broader customer base, and introduce a sub-£45k 2-seater that'll share its platform with Jag's 3-series rival?
IIRC the XK goes upmarket apparently. 4 seater coupe based on the XJ? Oh. Dear. God. Yes.But... I get that the F-type is an alternative to the 911 and Aston Vantage. But, because the V8 F-type clearly also tramples all over the XK's paws, what are Jag's medium- to longterm plans for its product range, especially the XK?
Presumably, the next XK will move up to the c. £90k-£120k bracket to be a Conti-/DB9-type GT?
Or will Jag actually drop the XK, let the F-type coupé/drophead cover its broader customer base, and introduce a sub-£45k 2-seater that'll share its platform with Jag's 3-series rival?
NGK210 said:
...what are Jag's medium- to longterm plans for its product range, especially the XK?...
It's an interesting one because I don't really see the differentiation between XF and XJIf there is a manual coming it should've been available from launch imo; good looking in the photos though, looking forward to seeing the metal
collateral said:
It's an interesting one because I don't really see the differentiation between XF and XJ
If there is a manual coming it should've been available from launch imo; good looking in the photos though, looking forward to seeing the metal
Think of it like 5-Series vs. 7-Series, E-Class vs. S-Class. The XJ is a lot, lot bigger (though doesn't feel it at all to drive).If there is a manual coming it should've been available from launch imo; good looking in the photos though, looking forward to seeing the metal
Jimbo. said:
collateral said:
It's an interesting one because I don't really see the differentiation between XF and XJ
If there is a manual coming it should've been available from launch imo; good looking in the photos though, looking forward to seeing the metal
Think of it like 5-Series vs. 7-Series, E-Class vs. S-Class. The XJ is a lot, lot bigger (though doesn't feel it at all to drive).If there is a manual coming it should've been available from launch imo; good looking in the photos though, looking forward to seeing the metal
Max_Torque said:
I suspect the biggest "looser" from this new car isn't going to be Porsche but Aston Martin. Suddenly the V8V is looking incredibly long in the tooth..........
Also, i suspect the aftermarket tuners are going to have a field day transplanting the "S" cal into the non S denso ecu's
The V8V has been out since 2005 and hasn't changed a great deal Also, i suspect the aftermarket tuners are going to have a field day transplanting the "S" cal into the non S denso ecu's
Hopefully AM are working on a new one otherwise I can see this Jag taking a lot of their sales away
Personally I think it looks great and will hopefully be a good used buy in 3 years...
nickfrog said:
Particularly as it's mainly aluminium and only has a small boot when the Cayman is more practical and 250kg lighter despite only having a steel chassis and some steel panels.
An SL63 AMG weighs 1777Kg, 911 cabrio weighs 1600Kg and F Type V8 weighs 1665KG so not particularly light or heavy. I think people underestimate how large this car is, much closer to a SL than SLK. The Vambo said:
I think people underestimate how large this car is, much closer to a SL than SLK.
that's true, but why are all the reviews saying how tiny it feels inside? the autocar ones says a boxster is more practical...I must admit that as lovely as it looks and as commended as jag should be for making it, it is just so expensive. Upwards of £60k puts it into more exotic territory but it's made by a mainstream manufacturer. Someone earlier said think of it as a cheaper Aston. no way. it's only a Jag.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff