It can't really be mistaken for a British police car

It can't really be mistaken for a British police car

Author
Discussion

Triumph Man

8,723 posts

170 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
I like the black steel wheels on those American Police cars.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

207 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
AndrewEH1 said:
Cool mum! Nothing wrong with the car at all.
Agreed, kudos!

skyrover

12,682 posts

206 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Triumph Man said:
I like the black steel wheels on those American Police cars.
Heavy duty wheels and suspension for riding up kerbs or across rough ground/offroad

skyrover

12,682 posts

206 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
279 said:
Nice to see that pedestrian safety is valued in the US just as highly as it is here in Europe.
Ever been to America?...

nobody walks hehe

paranoid airbag

2,679 posts

161 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
McSam said:
TooMany2cvs said:
McSam said:
Much as I'd like to dispute horse-riders having "as much place as car drivers" on the road, despite being there as a hobby while most car drivers are by necessity, let's leave that aside
No, let's not. Because that same logic could equally be used to term anybody who's driving other than "for necessity" as a similarly second-class road user. And, if you're getting into that hierarchy, is a commute "necessary"? Get on the bus, and leave the road to vans and trucks.
First I should point out that I wouldn't normally go down this road (hah), and considered binning that line but GC8's attitude on the subject hacked me off a bit so I thought I'd leave it in. As I said earlier, I have no issue with horse-riders and always treat them with respect, even those who try to make me think they're police officers.

To your argument - yes, it could. The roads exist to facilitate quick and easy transportation, something which is now done almost exclusively by motorised vehicles, though some also still by bicycle. I don't know anyone who rides a horse as their primary means of getting around. It's not appropriate to debate which journeys are "necessary", that's down to the judgement of the road user, the question is whether what you're doing on the road is your best/most convenient means of transport from one place to another. I'm sure there are a select few cases where this applies to the horse-rider, just as there are a few cases where you or I might go out for a drive without actually having a destination, but in the overwhelming majority the car driver is trying to get somewhere, and the horse-rider is pursuing a hobby. You must also consider that those of us driving for pleasure or any other unnecessary reason are highly compatible with other motorised vehicle users and cause near-zero inconvenience, whereas the horse is no longer very compatible with other road users.

I'm not saying horses should be banned from the road, not at all, nor do I rate them a second-class road user. They currently have the same rights to the roads as I do, and I think those demanding they "pay road tax" (which doesn't even exist) or "stay in the fields" are selfish and unempathetic. But do I think the horse still has "just as much place" on the roads as motorised vehicles, in the practical and social sense? No. It's no longer a mode of transportation, so in principle perhaps does not have "as much place" as vehicles which are modes of transportation.

GC8 said:
They aren't 'dressing up like a copper'. Mate, you're an idiot.
A lot of insults being thrown out of your pram here.. scratchchin
With all due respect, what does "they have [and implied that they should have] a right to use the road... but 'no place' on it" mean?

Congratulations, you're the more morally worthy road user? So what? You get a cookie? You're allowed to be a dick to them? No, at least no more than you were anyway.

I just don't see any point or meaning in making that claim in this context except as a rationalisation for attacking someone.

aka_kerrly

12,440 posts

212 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
joe1145 said:
aka_kerrly said:
That's a brave move but I like it and expect it does generate quite a reaction from those with a slightly nervous/guilty side to them!

a chap down the road from me has a Soarer wrapped up like a police car which is always amusing to see driven about.
This is near me (or one similar) guy also has green Focus RS
Yes the owner does also live in "the Shire" and does have a Focus along with a few other cars most of which are stickered up in some way to.

McSam

6,753 posts

177 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
paranoid airbag said:
With all due respect, what does "they have [and implied that they should have] a right to use the road... but 'no place' on it" mean?

Congratulations, you're the more morally worthy road user? So what? You get a cookie? You're allowed to be a dick to them? No, at least no more than you were anyway.

I just don't see any point or meaning in making that claim in this context except as a rationalisation for attacking someone.
I didn't say horses have no place on the road, and never would say that. I did point out that I have absolutely nothing against their use of it. I simply explained why I think, conceptually (NOT practically with the current state of the law or the history of this country), they now have perhaps rather less place than modern modes of transport. To phrase it another way, their continued use of the roads is less vital. That is to say that if usage of the road was dramatically tightened for some reason, horses might no longer be permitted as they are less appropriate. Would you consider horse-riders' ability to use the roads of equal importance to car drivers?

Purely hypothetical, vanishingly unlikely and not a rationalisation for any behaviour, just a response to GC8's earlier statement that horses have "just as much place" as car drivers.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

128 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
McSam said:
I did point out that I have absolutely nothing against their use of it. I simply explained why I think, conceptually (NOT practically with the current state of the law or the history of this country), they now have perhaps rather less place than modern modes of transport. To phrase it another way, their continued use of the roads is less vital.
And, in that simple statement, you laid the ground for tiering of road use according to some arbitrary priority.

ManOpener

12,467 posts

171 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
That's a brave move but I like it and expect it does generate quite a reaction from those with a slightly nervous/guilty side to them!

a chap down the road from me has a Soarer wrapped up like a police car which is always amusing to see driven about.
I used to see that all the time, but these days every time I see my parents it's just parked up looking a bit sad.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

150 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
McSam said:
I did point out that I have absolutely nothing against their use of it. I simply explained why I think, conceptually (NOT practically with the current state of the law or the history of this country), they now have perhaps rather less place than modern modes of transport. To phrase it another way, their continued use of the roads is less vital.
And, in that simple statement, you laid the ground for tiering of road use according to some arbitrary priority.
Already applies to motorways - not allowed to be used by learners, pedestrians, horses or horse drawn vehicles, cyclists, agricultural vehicles and mopeds.

anonymous-user

56 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
The police don't drive Avenger's in the states though... they drive charger's, taurus's, caprice's, explorer's and tahoe's.

Anything else just isn't right smile

5.7 V8, 370 horsepower



3.5 twin turbo, 365 horsepower



6.0 V8, 355 horsepower



3.5 twin turbo, 365 horsepower



6.2 V8, 407 horsepower









Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 17th February 07:25
Which would be impressive if they didn't all weigh as much as supertankers

skyrover

12,682 posts

206 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
no heavier than the Euro equivalent...

Except the Euro equivalent would have a wheezy 4 cylinder diesel and struggle to get out of it's own way.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

190 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
no heavier than the Euro equivalent...
Are you sure.


anonymous-user

56 months

Tuesday 17th February 2015
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
Are you sure.
I'm not.

smile

skyrover

12,682 posts

206 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
Ford Explorer: 2,067kg
Land Rover Discovery: 2,558kg

Ford Taurus: 1,821 kg
Audi A6 Quattro: 1,855 Kg

come again?


Devil2575

13,400 posts

190 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Ford Explorer: 2,067kg
Land Rover Discovery: 2,558kg

Ford Taurus: 1,821 kg
Audi A6 Quattro: 1,855 Kg

come again?
Ah yes, two well known Police cars...


skyrover

12,682 posts

206 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
skyrover said:
Ford Explorer: 2,067kg
Land Rover Discovery: 2,558kg

Ford Taurus: 1,821 kg
Audi A6 Quattro: 1,855 Kg

come again?
Ah yes, two well known Police cars...
Well the discovery certainly is, we have loads of them up here up north. I think it's the favored highway patrol car.

The point i'm making is the Yank car's are no heavier than their Euro equivalents, police or not.

In fact the charger is based on an e-class mercedes, the taurus and explorer are both based on Ford's D5 platform which is shared with the volvo s60 etc etc

It's a global market.



Edited by skyrover on Wednesday 18th February 07:31

xRIEx

8,180 posts

150 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
skyrover said:
Ford Explorer: 2,067kg
Land Rover Discovery: 2,558kg

Ford Taurus: 1,821 kg
Audi A6 Quattro: 1,855 Kg

come again?
Ah yes, two well known Police cars...
BMW X5, that's 2105kg.

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
skyrover said:
Well the discovery certainly is, we have loads of them up here up north. I think it's the favored highway patrol car.

The point i'm making is the Yank car's are no heavier than their Euro equivalents, police or not.

In fact the charger is based on an e-class mercedes, the taurus and explorer are both based on Ford's D5 platform which is shared with the volvo s60 etc etc

It's a global market.
Are you 300hp/ton in disguise?



Comparing generic US cars to UK cars is utterly pointless. The power output is only half the story, the other half being obvious.....

V8forweekends

2,485 posts

126 months

Wednesday 18th February 2015
quotequote all
wolfracesonic said:
Do you think there is a soccer mom in the US who takes her kids to school in a leggy, beat up diesel Astra panda car?
laughlaughlaughlaugh