RE: Shed Of The Week: Leyland Convoy

RE: Shed Of The Week: Leyland Convoy

Author
Discussion

Valgar

850 posts

137 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
As a PO worker (harsh stereotyping) I have driven about 100,000 miles in these, the gearshift was always vague at best, was utterly gutless, leaked through the windows (all of them) when it rained, the rear brakes had a habit of locking on with the slightest tap when cold and in summer the heat soak from the engine was murderous.

However for space per £ they couldn't be beat, had a decent payload of around 1300kg aswell, I used to load one up with 1300kg daily and climb very steep hills in it, no matter what you threw at it, it managed.

Immobilisers were often an issue for us too, one day it wouldn't start whilst I was parked next to a plane that wanted to take off, poor timing.

suffolk009

5,523 posts

167 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
suffolk009 said:
I remember renting and driving one for a couple of days, full of fellow Uni students in the late 90s.

It had a cassette player, the radio didn't work, and we had to listen to the same Oasis tape for two days.
tell me it wasn't 'Standing on the shoulder of giants'
It was.

W00DY

15,544 posts

228 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
Vans are ace and anyone who says otherwise is either too posh or too dull to understand.


Good shed.

poing

8,743 posts

202 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
Shed of the year right there!

Ignore the doubters, great article and great shed.

phil y

548 posts

124 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
Helped a friend move house with one of these, it was on an 06 plate, so must have been one of the last. It was 3 years old, and the heater was jammed on full heat. So it was a very hot, very noisy, very long drive down the M6 with the windows down.

Had to endure them as school minibuses too, some bright spark had stood on the roof to load the roof rack, so the dented roof vibrated horrendously on the motorway.

Ilovejapcrap

3,288 posts

114 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
yes I get it.

Drove one up to Carlisle with a mate to drop some stuff off.

loved the metro clocks lol. Crap it was and we had a right laugh, smoking and eating st petrol station food all the way

Itsallicanafford

2,782 posts

161 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
suffolk009 said:
It was.
...Painful

BILL PAYER

526 posts

181 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
Just write on the sides "I DONT TARMAC DRIVES "in big capital letters and it will be fine.

iva cosworth

44,044 posts

165 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
I bet the old Fiat Ducato I drove once was worse than this thing.

Blakewater

4,312 posts

159 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
My school had a minibus version of one of these donated by DAF. It was too tall to fit in the garage like the 1992 Volkswagen LT it replaced did and it got torched one night.

djbobbins

101 posts

178 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
I used to drive p155ed students around in Manchester at night, as part of which I drove a 17 seat LWB version of this, but also a VW Caravelle, a Transit and a Renault Trafic.

Of all of them, I'd say the Renault and the LDV were equally unpleasant to drive, although the Trafic that I drove had had a very hard life. The VW was a joy to drive but was brand spanking new and to be honest, trying to compare a large LDV with a VW Transporter is like telling me that a Lada Riva estate is not as nice a drive as a BMW 3 series touring. It's bigger, cheaper and was always designed to be completely utilitarian.

Personally, mechanically i would opt for a Sprinter van but the MB water-based paint means the bodies are fit for work as sieves pretty quickly... and still make more money than the Shed. My neighbour sold his p-plate, untaxed, dented, rotten, MOT-expired 230k mile ex-courier Sprinter recently for £750. So, if someone wants a cheap, big van, I say go for it!

Neil E 99

119 posts

117 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
The RAC used these for a while back in the day.
When my dads SD1 rover came to a halt the RAC man arrived in one of these.
He gave us a lift home and it couldnt get up a not to steep hill. Dispite several attempts and long run ups it just couldnt do it.
Older Transits went past without any trouble.
Had to take the very long way home instead.

Strawman

6,463 posts

209 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
djbobbins said:
Personally, mechanically i would opt for a Sprinter van but the MB water-based paint means the bodies are fit for work as sieves pretty quickly...
To be fair all current car paint is water based (EU directives being what they are). Mercedes went through a bad patch where they switched steel providers and struggled to perfect paint resilience, with disastrous consequences, the paint thing has been resolved now.

School boy

1,006 posts

213 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
Blakewater said:
My school had a minibus version of one of these donated by DAF. It was too tall to fit in the garage like the 1992 Volkswagen LT it replaced did and it got torched one night.
Our one got done at school too, must have been part of the curriculum.

I want one, got a transit the same age at the moment with the worst bodywork you have ever seen and love it.
The transit engines in these are turbos and not as bullet proof as you think. Though they were also used in London cabs and I've got one with 480k on the clock still going.
They were actually the widest vans you could buy. There's a mint one still in use by the P.O. In Bethnal Green if anyone's interested lol.

DCLXIV

361 posts

137 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
I always had the feeling that the only people who were surprised that LDV went under were LDV themselves. Everyone else knew they were st.

Never driven one, but have been made to suffer sitting in various school minibuses. Even Transits were in a different league when it came to comfort & NVH.

StuntmanMike

11,671 posts

153 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
What an utterly depressing piece, the article and the wk van.

CDP

7,473 posts

256 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
Strawman said:
djbobbins said:
Personally, mechanically i would opt for a Sprinter van but the MB water-based paint means the bodies are fit for work as sieves pretty quickly...
To be fair all current car paint is water based (EU directives being what they are). Mercedes went through a bad patch where they switched steel providers and struggled to perfect paint resilience, with disastrous consequences, the paint thing has been resolved now.
They might have solved it but I think I'll wait a decade before buying a Mercedes just to make sure smile

Hugh stinquer

13 posts

160 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
I worked at LDV for fifteen years and the Post Office kept us going for most, if not all of that time.
The storage parking was then a sea of red most of the year, as many drivers passing the factory northbound on the M6 will probably remember.
The Convoy was tough, resilient to abuse and rough treatment and cheap, no more no less.
Admittedly slow compared to modern vans but the ride isn't bad, the engine does have some potential headaches, Fords engine management related and I will guarantee soggy cab floor mats(they never successfully resolved that one)
The Shed might want to explore the more interesting versions built by us, the Rover V8 versions built for the Police, Ambulance service and the BRSCC as a race track rapid response fire and rescue vans.............

Edited by Hugh stinquer on Friday 7th August 22:08


Edited by Hugh stinquer on Friday 7th August 22:18

W124Bob

1,753 posts

177 months

Friday 7th August 2015
quotequote all
RenesisEvo said:
BV51HYT it's so bad it's registration plate almost admits it.
Wheres Breadvan!

truck71

2,328 posts

174 months

Saturday 8th August 2015
quotequote all
These were known as low demand vans for a reason.