RE: Volvo to fit all cars with 112mph speed limiter

RE: Volvo to fit all cars with 112mph speed limiter

Author
Discussion

Kawasicki

13,134 posts

237 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Expect more of this. The real reason is the effect higher speeds have on the range of battery electric vehicles.

modeller

450 posts

168 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all

Guess you missed what's coming down from the EU soon - Intelligent Speed Assistance -

https://etsc.eu/meps-back-life-saving-vehicle-safe...

Jhonno

5,830 posts

143 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Fire99 said:
The bigger issue I have with regards to GPS limited speed, is that I'm basically broadcasting to the powers at be where I am at all times.
So some that may not be an issue but for me there is a principal of being free and not being effectively snooped on.

I know when GPS's were first introduced in an old company of mine. The claim was purely to make journeys more efficient for the Technicians etc.. It was a very short time before they were asking why a Technician had stopped at a certain place or allegedly taken a break etc etc...

So it's a direction I'm quite adverse to.
This.

It isn't the 112mph restriction that is the issue. I don't like the removal of choice. I drive cars that can do a lot more. Do I choose to use it, pretty much no, but I could if I wanted.

Motormatt

485 posts

220 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I think this is nothing more than a bit of posturing for marketing purposes.

Weirdly the two stand out pieces of really bad driving I've witnessed over the last 12 Months were both new XC90s.

One attempted a multi car overtake on an A road that any sane person would have thought twice about on a Ducati Panigale let alone a horribly underpowered SUV. That nearly resulted in a very nasty head on smash.
Second one was tackling a sharply curved flyover joining a dual carriageway waaaaaaay too fast in the wet resulting in a hilarious tank slapper before the car took control back from its driver and rectified the situation. It was moments away from riding straight over the armco and down onto the carriageway below.

Point being both could have been very nasty accidents but both took place well under 112mph.


900T-R

20,404 posts

259 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
768 said:
No incidents involve excess speed below a speed limit?
Most of them, I would hazard to guess - partly based on the numbers dregged up by SafeSpeed (remember them?) nearer the beginning of the century.


C70R

17,596 posts

106 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
rykard said:
How many 'accidents' occur above 100mph? This is just headline grabbing, those who think 112 is quick will still buy them...
112mph is quick. It's faster than 99.9999% of UK drivers travel in an average month.

SS54

17 posts

98 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
It's the thin end of the wedge.
Soon enough your Volvo will be reporting you to the Police for speeding and banning you from driving for talking to your passengers.

Amanitin

427 posts

139 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
kambites said:
So you don't want/have ABS or traction control or parking sensors or... in your car then? All systems which exist to help drivers not to make mistakes which they really shouldn't.
engaging the ABS or parking sensors is a real life thing.
as opposed to doing 110 mph by mistake.

768

13,883 posts

98 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
C70R said:
rykard said:
How many 'accidents' occur above 100mph? This is just headline grabbing, those who think 112 is quick will still buy them...
112mph is quick. It's faster than 99.9999% of UK drivers travel in an average month.
I was passed by a Peugeot doing a bit more than that this week.

900T-R

20,404 posts

259 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
It's a Volvo, not a Ferrari. How many of them do you think actually go above 100mph in their whole life cycle?
Lots, based on the number of XC90s and V60T6'es I see driven with scant respect for fellow motorway users over here (they 'sold' gazillions of the things to user-choosers here because they attracted decimated BIK taxes up until a couple of years ago on the strength of a sub-50g/km CO2 rating).


Haltamer

2,460 posts

82 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
768 said:
C70R said:
rykard said:
How many 'accidents' occur above 100mph? This is just headline grabbing, those who think 112 is quick will still buy them...
112mph is quick. It's faster than 99.9999% of UK drivers travel in an average month.
I was passed by a Peugeot doing a bit more than that this week.
I'd +1 on this - I've got a tiny 1339cc NA Engine, pushing 100HP for a mid size car, and I can attain 114MPH (Tested with a full load on the Autobahn too)

Getting up to 100 from ~70 doesn't take that long, either - Certainly not a supercar by any measure, but still - Capable of doing it if one intends to.

I'd say the vast majority of modern cars can attain ~110; Even the smallest super mini city cars manage 90mph.

The majority of cars, I'd say, can get at least ~125MPH.

Personally, I don't think it's genuinely "quick" unless it's 155mph+ - There aren't many cars that can manage that; And even then it's hardly an unattainable figure - An FK8 CTR will get 168mph for £30K new, and there are plenty of examples of used cars that can manage the same for less outlay.

The other day, making my way down the A127 I was overtaken by a XC90 which was most certainly pushing the above figures; Going along at 90mph or so with it noticeably looming on me, and wafting past with a fair speed differential.

nickfrog

21,396 posts

219 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
simonrockman said:
automatic geofencing to automatically limit speeds around schools and hospitals.
I hope that's implemented as it sounds like a great idea, hopefully others will follow.

TwistingMyMelon

6,387 posts

207 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Wont bother me

I cant remember the last time I went over 100, let alone in an overweight volvo and ive driven lots of overweight volvos

Not exactly new, 10 years ago I had a transit limited to 70 mph, which was ironic as the Transit it replaced couldn't hit 70mph when laden up

Will probably be easy enough to remove should you fancy it

flatso

1,251 posts

131 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Who owns Volvo? I take it most here have a bit of an idea of the control freaks running the country of origin of the owners.
Surprised?
Its just the beginning, its gonna get a lot more absurd.
Funnily though people in the west actually vote for this crap, they think its cool as can be. You see people wearing t-shirts and hats and all sorts of signs glorifying this.
Spoiled, naive, self hating, virtue signaling turds are begging for this.

Wills2

23,256 posts

177 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I think most of us keep it below an indicated 100mph on the motorway because of the threat of being banned, but I like the fact that my car is built to do more than 150mph, makes it more comfortable and able at lower speeds, if they limit the speed then they will dumb down on the engineering quality to suit.






nickfrog

21,396 posts

219 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
kambites said:
I've never driven a road car faster than 112mph anyway, so I couldn't care less.
Approaching Schwedenkreuz and a few other spots at the Ring at over that speed, even in a road car, is an experience that all driving enthusiasts should try, although they would soon be addicted and track day prices would go up...


Edited by nickfrog on Monday 4th March 16:14

Pica-Pica

13,993 posts

86 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
wab172uk said:
I'd imagine for a small fee £1000+ on the options list, they'll removed this limiter.

Sales in Germany will drop like a stone overnight.
Why? Germany has high road traffic casualty incidents, there is pressure there to reduce that. I do not see this as having any effect in the German market.

Superleg48

1,524 posts

135 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Lots of wailing and moaning going on and references to principles blah blah blah. Load of bks.

Ask yourself how many times you did over 100 mph on any public road for more than a few seconds or at all. This is license losing territory and on our roads a bit silly.

Also ask yourself if whatever car you drive would somehow be less enjoyable if you couldn’t exceed 100mph. I drive a Gallardo LP570-4 SL and a Mustang GT to put some context on this question. Both very capable of far exceeding 100mph. I don’t think I have ever exceeded 100mph in either on a public road..well maybe one or two times for a little bit...

My point is that it really is no big deal. The most exciting part of driving is acceleration and bendy roads involving lots of downshifting and up shifting, rather than sitting for long distances banging the nuts out of it at 3 figure speeds.

So, as another poster put, 0-80 in 4 seconds...yes please! Top end restriction..whatever. In any event it will be an electronic limit anyway and I am sure there will be plenty of laptop boys that could plug in and turn it off for you.

cookie1600

2,153 posts

163 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
modeller said:
Guess you missed what's coming down from the EU soon - Intelligent Speed Assistance -
Good for them. We're not in the EU as of 29/03/19 are we?

Perhaps we could become the unlimited capital of Europe and welcome thousands of responsible, brisk drivers from abroad, who can use the throttle and brake intelligently without electronic gadgetry.

However, as it stands, we have a 70mph national limit and roads so full they defy you to try and achieve anything above that. So this really means nothing from Volvo for 99% of UK drivers. If you're concerned, other vehicles are still available.

warch

2,941 posts

156 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I love the touching naivety of people who really believe UK cars and other goods will no longer be subject to new EU regulations.