OpenReach indirectly dinged my car - thoughts?
Discussion
Tricky one this.
I think the best solution would be to find the person(s) who established BT, then sue them if they are still alive, if not sue their family on the grounds that their company caused an accident due to the Butterfly Effect.
At the same time sue your other halves mother for giving birth to someone who is incapable of driving a car without damaging it.
I think the best solution would be to find the person(s) who established BT, then sue them if they are still alive, if not sue their family on the grounds that their company caused an accident due to the Butterfly Effect.
At the same time sue your other halves mother for giving birth to someone who is incapable of driving a car without damaging it.
Phil Dicky said:
krisdelta said:
parabolica said:
KP328 said:
Just wondering, was the BT van a Transit or a Vivaro ?
10/10 for dragging that back into the PH conscious once more
and one from me, well played! @OP - no, not a leg to stand on. Fix it, move on.
DoubleD said:
Phil Dicky said:
krisdelta said:
parabolica said:
KP328 said:
Just wondering, was the BT van a Transit or a Vivaro ?
10/10 for dragging that back into the PH conscious once more and one from me, well played! @OP - no, not a leg to stand on. Fix it, move on.
The OP deleted their original message (presumably out of shame) but it's quoted further down the thread.
EazyDuz said:
Tricky one this.
I think the best solution would be to find the person(s) who established BT, then sue them if they are still alive, if not sue their family on the grounds that their company caused an accident due to the Butterfly Effect.
At the same time sue your other halves mother for giving birth to someone who is incapable of driving a car without damaging it.
Better still, sue OFCOM who decided that OpenReach should be split from BT.I think the best solution would be to find the person(s) who established BT, then sue them if they are still alive, if not sue their family on the grounds that their company caused an accident due to the Butterfly Effect.
At the same time sue your other halves mother for giving birth to someone who is incapable of driving a car without damaging it.
legless said:
DoubleD said:
Phil Dicky said:
krisdelta said:
parabolica said:
KP328 said:
Just wondering, was the BT van a Transit or a Vivaro ?
10/10 for dragging that back into the PH conscious once more and one from me, well played! @OP - no, not a leg to stand on. Fix it, move on.
The OP deleted their original message (presumably out of shame) but it's quoted further down the thread.
Speed Badger said:
Vaud said:
Someone should write a song about things being ironic.
And use this example to correct previous errors
I know! Barely any of that song is ironic, most of it is just unlucky, sod's law or typical. And use this example to correct previous errors
If the contents of the song were actually ironic it would need to be called ‘unlucky’
Dear OP,
We'd like to apologise for the unfortunate indirect dinging incident, which we've filed under ding-gate.
We accept indirect liability and you should shortly receive compensation from our nominated outsourced partner, your wife.
With our best regards for the weekend.
Openreach Special Situations Customer Service Team
We'd like to apologise for the unfortunate indirect dinging incident, which we've filed under ding-gate.
We accept indirect liability and you should shortly receive compensation from our nominated outsourced partner, your wife.
With our best regards for the weekend.
Openreach Special Situations Customer Service Team
Pica-Pica said:
EazyDuz said:
Tricky one this.
I think the best solution would be to find the person(s) who established BT, then sue them if they are still alive, if not sue their family on the grounds that their company caused an accident due to the Butterfly Effect.
At the same time sue your other halves mother for giving birth to someone who is incapable of driving a car without damaging it.
Better still, sue OFCOM who decided that OpenReach should be split from BT.I think the best solution would be to find the person(s) who established BT, then sue them if they are still alive, if not sue their family on the grounds that their company caused an accident due to the Butterfly Effect.
At the same time sue your other halves mother for giving birth to someone who is incapable of driving a car without damaging it.
OP, what would happen if this morning one of your kids wanted scrambled eggs for breakfast. You’d run out of eggs in the house and needed to nip out to the shop to get some.
Whilst parking up, you negligently hit a bollard in the car park and damaged the bumper on your car.
Would you seek to recover the cost of repairing the damage from the kid who wanted eggs?
Whilst parking up, you negligently hit a bollard in the car park and damaged the bumper on your car.
Would you seek to recover the cost of repairing the damage from the kid who wanted eggs?
KungFuPanda said:
OP, what would happen if this morning one of your kids wanted scrambled eggs for breakfast. You’d run out of eggs in the house and needed to nip out to the shop to get some.
Whilst parking up, you negligently hit a bollard in the car park and damaged the bumper on your car.
Would you seek to recover the cost of repairing the damage from the kid who wanted eggs?
What nonsense. It’s the bollard’s fault.Whilst parking up, you negligently hit a bollard in the car park and damaged the bumper on your car.
Would you seek to recover the cost of repairing the damage from the kid who wanted eggs?
Or maybe the eggs. Or the chicken’s fault for laying the eggs. Which came first?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff