RE: New 911 Turbo S Revealed

RE: New 911 Turbo S Revealed

Author
Discussion

Complex

516 posts

177 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
He probably took a look at it?

[AJ]

3,079 posts

200 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
russy01 said:
just another edition of an already boring car
Yeah, why isn't this news about a new Astra, or even more exciting, a Lexus! wink

k-ink

9,070 posts

181 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Pretty awesome as a daily hack. In some ways it's pricey. But look at it this way - there is no longer any need to pay a quarter of a mil for a RUF!

Obviously as a weekender the GT2 would more than likely be more fun. But that's not the market for a Turbo is it.

carsnapper

334 posts

243 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Gun said:
The Turbo has always left me cold, I'll have a GT3 thanks, in Orange.
Agreed on the Turbo leaving me feeling cold & remote. Fast and comfortable and so stable at high speed, yet so dull to drive fast.

The GT3 has always left me feeling, well, brown! That back end likes to jiggle around a little bit too much for my liking, especially downhill under heavy braking. The bull in the road didn't help matters much.

In a way, I wish they would un-engineer this car a little and give it some faults / character back. Oh, and perhaps shoehorn a flat 8 into the middle wink

zakelwe

4,449 posts

200 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
TWIN TUBI said:
Springbok said:
Fell asleep in all the excitement of yet another 911........yawn.
HUH? You fell asleep? I was rendered unconscious in a vegetative state after reading news that another Porsche 911 variant is being updated .I think I remember the article stating that the headlights are 0.000000098% larger than those on the the 2009 turbos S coupe and the air conditioner compression motor produces an extra 0.0016 Nm of torque at sea level, AMAZING NEWS!
You then go onto extol the virtues of the Nissan GT-R. That's the same Nissan who brought out a V-Spec which has a lot less added to it than the Turbo S but then charge an extra £60 000. So what's value for money then, the top Porsche or top GT-R? Spec V has a set of wheels and some paint and a bit of carbon? How much more power and torque has it got? Oh dear ....

Andy

Daniel1

2,931 posts

200 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
do we have to turn this into another 911 vs GTR big d*cks thread?

ETA for the lack of swearfilter

Edited by Daniel1 on Monday 8th February 18:11

paul_k

88 posts

222 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
The facts are the new 911 Turbo has more torque and HP than the GTR. It will win from the lights.
It will not win on the track...

Yes the V spec GTR is poor value but then compare that with a 911 sport classic - now that is a rip off.

k-ink

9,070 posts

181 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
FFS. Not everyone gives a monkeys about some disposable nissan. Give it a rest.

CarbonM5

927 posts

193 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Would rather have a used R8 V8 and drive a bit slower!


cbrannan

128 posts

185 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Brilliant mate, well said squeezebm, they probably drive diesel fiesta's!!
squeezebm said:
Fecking Hilarious .................a car that does 0-60 in 3 secs and gets slated by the usual PH "i've got no car in my profile net nerds" typenerdreadit priceless .

Carry on

Caractacus

2,604 posts

227 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
fluffyducky said:
BSC said:
TWIN TUBI said:
Seriously This is just a pathetic face saving attempt by the German car company to build a 911 that's faster than a sub £56k 2010 Nissan spec GT-R. For £130,000 i could buy GT-R, cayman S and a Golf gti instead of this mutated Volkswagen beetle with its Nazi sponsored origins from WWII . German efficiency and innovation is only matched by the Japanese so why do they insist on being second best trying to perfect this outdated rear engined relic?
Could you imagine that not the "rear engined relic" is outdated but your mentioning of Nazi is?

Why do so many comments on here refer to some Nazi stuff? And everytime to vilify either the Germans or German cars, designed vehicles, technology. As long as I follow gassing station I have never ever read a comment mentioning the british behaviour in the famine catastrophe. I will not compare Nazi crimes to other crimes, but I think Pistonheads doesn't provide a platform for both.
Godwins Law. Always going to come in early when talking about Porsche...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Indeed. TwinMoobie - pay attention - "...once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress..."

loser

KissMyR8

87 posts

178 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Thats some machine!

People really need to stop with the GTR comparisons, if you like/want a GTR so bad go buy one!

Edited by KissMyR8 on Monday 8th February 18:40

cbrannan

128 posts

185 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
that's a really clever comment, one for each brain cell?
spice said:
you can buy two Carreras for that

cbrannan

128 posts

185 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Agreed russy01, wonder what he drives that is so much more exciting, a prius, a nissan micra or maybe the ecstatically spectacular Hyundai accent?
Lost soul said:
russy01 said:
just another edition of an already boring car,
How on earth did you work out that it boring !!!

cbrannan

128 posts

185 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
yeah, un-engineer it about 20 years to the old 3.2 Carrera, pure brilliance without all the tecky gizmo's needing to be actually driven, and not 'driven in', by a host of computers??
carsnapper said:
Gun said:
The Turbo has always left me cold, I'll have a GT3 thanks, in Orange.
Agreed on the Turbo leaving me feeling cold & remote. Fast and comfortable and so stable at high speed, yet so dull to drive fast.

The GT3 has always left me feeling, well, brown! That back end likes to jiggle around a little bit too much for my liking, especially downhill under heavy braking. The bull in the road didn't help matters much.

In a way, I wish they would un-engineer this car a little and give it some faults / character back. Oh, and perhaps shoehorn a flat 8 into the middle wink

911p

2,335 posts

182 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
I think that this car will be far more capable than the GT-R in the real world, especially on our B-roads. I've seen plenty of vids showing 997.1 TT's beating GT-R's on the road. On top of this, the reliability of the 911 will undoubtedly be better, with no ridiculous transmission bills. Alternatively, owners can get the GTR's revised LC - which is limited to 3000rpm (I think). This won't be touching the 997.2 TTS in the acceleration department!

In addition, there is some disappointment as PDK is the only trannsmission available. However; think about all of the GT-R's computing, and of course it's DCT. The GT-R practically drives itself - how else would a 1800kg car get a 7:27 'Ring lap time (unless R-rated tyres were used)? Nissan have gone about the GT-R with only figures on paper in mind IMO - and this technique has been a success. Nissan's sales department are earning their money well...

B17NNS

18,506 posts

249 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
62mph in 3.3 seconds

biggrin

ge0rge

3,053 posts

207 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
Dont see why the top speed hasnt changed from 194 from the std turbo to the S, surely cars with such grunt should be pushing the 200 mark?

911p

2,335 posts

182 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
ge0rge said:
Dont see why the top speed hasnt changed from 194 from the std turbo to the S, surely cars with such grunt should be pushing the 200 mark?
I was thinking the same thing - revised aerodynamics, or gear ratios for brutal acceleration perhaps?

Housey

2,076 posts

229 months

Monday 8th February 2010
quotequote all
russy01 said:
just another edition of an already boring car, however this one does sound proper fast!!!
You can feel comfortable that statements such of this are, more often than not, made from the seat of a Saxo, Focus, Passat, Golf......or Astra and usually from someone who has never sat in one less alone driven one. We are of course all entitled to our opinion, but please, such lines have been trotted out by the ill informed for years, tiring to say the least. 911 turbo is boring in the same way I would turn down Megan Fox and Adriana Lima if they were lying in my bed asking me to join them.........eating Marmite on toast AND with beer!

Putting that to one side however Porsche is taking the piss more and more of late. I get evolution, I get refinement of excellence but others are simply moving the game on, which Porsche aren't and I am a 911 lover and former GT3 owner. Porsche, you are taking the piss with these spun releases with small tweaks and £21K price increases, even with options added.

Edited by Housey on Monday 8th February 19:33