Higher Displacement or Turbo?

Higher Displacement or Turbo?

Author
Discussion

samu23

Original Poster:

42 posts

160 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Having just made the move from a tuned MR2 turbo to a 350Z running roughly the same power, the V6 engine sounds and feels much better than a smaller turbocharged engine!

What do most people prefer in there sports cars, turbo or sporty V6, 8, 10 etc.......




Rawwr

22,722 posts

236 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Normally aspirated, peaky as fk and with a throttle response sharper than a page of Oscar Wilde witticisms that have been rolled up into a point, sprinkled with lemon juice and jabbed into someones eye.

anonymous-user

56 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
er, both........


Dave Hedgehog

14,630 posts

206 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
er, both........

correct answer

samu23

Original Poster:

42 posts

160 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Wowww.

thiscocks

3,133 posts

197 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Propper sports cars are n/a. Ideally around 100bhp per liter.

Defcon5

6,207 posts

193 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
I much prefer NA engines for hooning in.

robmlufc

5,229 posts

188 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
There's no replacement for displacement.

valverguy

440 posts

177 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Normally aspirated, peaky as fk and with a throttle response sharper than a page of Oscar Wilde witticisms that have been rolled up into a point, sprinkled with lemon juice and jabbed into someones eye.
Someone loves the crimson small one as much as i do.... Smoke me a kipper ill be back for breakfast!

kambites

67,720 posts

223 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
I'd go for:

High specific output NA > large capacity low specific output NA = supercharger > slow > turbo

hehe

XitUp

7,690 posts

206 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Totally depends on the car.

Jonny777

8 posts

192 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
As the man said earlier, both!

Except I have them in 2 different cars. biggrin

superman84

772 posts

167 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
I'd go for:

High specific output NA > large capacity low specific output NA = supercharger > slow > turbo

hehe
Ah I see the turbo police are out already copbyebye

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

158 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Done right, both have their own unique characteristics and both are fun.

But since I'm a total sound we, I'd give the nudge to N/A if I had to.

KobayashiMaru

20,723 posts

193 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all

GroundEffect

13,864 posts

158 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
KobayashiMaru said:
Replace that with the Honda RA005 Suzuka-spec and you're there.

Mr MXT

7,693 posts

285 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
This reminds me when someone asked a female PHer: length or girth? Answer: yes.

More is more.
st frown

s m

23,313 posts

205 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
In an F40 I'd opt for a small turbo V8 whereas in a GT3 RS I'd go for a larger capacity naturally aspirated six

NiceCupOfTea

25,298 posts

253 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
Both in separate cars please!

Love the linear power delivery of a good n/a, but there is nothing like a turbo for that real push in the back / starfield blurring / hyperspace effect.

Also, in the real world turbos are brilliant for efficient overtaking.

anonymous-user

56 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
I've got from 2.0 Turbo 4WD, to 2.5 Straight 6 RWD, to 2.3 Turbo 4WD and now I am heading back to 2.8 Straight 6 RWD

So fked if I know