RE: Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 722 Edition for sale
RE: Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 722 Edition for sale
Tuesday 9th November 2021

Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren 722 Edition for sale

Remember when Mercedes and McLaren thought they could play nice and build supercars?


I had a very near miss with a Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren once. I was a whisker away from writing one off, but not, as you might imagine, by over-cooking it into a fast right-hander or experiencing a blowout at 300kph on the Autobahn. It was far less 'exciting' than either of those scenarios. Several years ago I ran an alloy wheel business, and I was just about to jack up an SLR and work some magic. The jack was poised in what seemed like a sensible place, just under the sill, when something in the back of my mind said "Stop!" And thank God it did. When I rang up the fella in McLaren's technical department to double-check what I was about to do, he told me that "if you'd have jacked it up there, mate, you'd have split the tub."

A lucky escape, then, and that was reflecting on the car at 2008 prices. In today's market you need a spare quarter-of-a-mill knocking about to bag an SLR, and two-and-a-half-times that amount for this one. Why? Because it's a 722 Edition and it was made, basically, because the SLR was a bit, well, underwhelming. Sure, the original car's 208mph top speed and 3.8sec 0-62mph time were both fast and quick, but the SLR was seen as too lardy and too much of a cruiser. And that was by the bloke who engineered it: Gordon Murray. He's on record as saying it should have been mid-engined, naturally aspirated and about 200 to 300kg lighter.

The 722 was, in a limited way, the car the SLR should've been from the start. I say limited because it was lighter, but by only 44kg, with the saving coming from, among other things, lighter wheels and aluminium Koni dampers instead of the original car's Bilstein shocks with steel casings. The suspension was also stiffer and the 722 sat lower - by 10mm - and had up to 128 per cent more downforce at speed.

The whole 722 twist was based on sharper responses, you see, to give it some hope against the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano - a car that was very nearly as quick yet cost half as much. Naturally, the 722 had to offer a bit more performance to go with its greater agility. So AMG rinsed its supercharged, 5.4-litre V8 for all it was worth, pushing the output from 626 to 650hp and torque from 575 to 605lb ft. As a result, the top speed peaked at 209mph and the 722 bested the SLR's acceleration by a couple of tenths.

Why was it called the 722? As the advert rightly points out, it was a nod to the 1955 Mille Miglia, a race was won by the late Sir Stirling Moss and his co-driver Denis Jenkinson in an original SLR racer. That car's number was 722, which denoted Moss's 7.22am start time, and he completed the 992-mile race in 10 hours, 7 minutes and 48 seconds. His average speed over the race distance was 99mph, an incredible record that still stands today.

This 722 doesn't have that kind of racing heritage to fall back on, even if the car became the basis of the 722 GT racing car. In which case, why is this 722 so much more than a standard SLR, bearing in mind that, when new, it commanded a mere £17,000 premium? Because this UK-registered car is one of only 150 that were built. Rarity, as ever in today's crazy supercar market, is everything.

Photo credit | Damian Blades


Author
Discussion

Venisonpie

Original Poster:

4,761 posts

110 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
"Why was it called the 722? As the advert rightly points out, it was a nod to the 1955 Mille Miglia, a race was won by the late Sir Stirling Moss and his co-driver Denis Jenkinson in an original SLR racer. That car's number was 722, which denoted Moss's 7.22am start time, and he completed the 992-mile race in 10 hours, 7 minutes and 48 seconds. His average speed over the race distance was 99mph, an incredible record that still stands today."

Averaging just under 100mph on public roads in 1955 must be like flying a Eurofighter down Oxford Street today. Immense.

waynecyclist

14,558 posts

142 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
I like these but running costs are eye watering.

benm143

12 posts

170 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
61 pics and not a single shot of the interior?? Were there potentially terrible interior colour choices?? Or is there some soiling....??

TyrannosauRoss Lex

36,729 posts

240 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Still a fantastic looking thing in my opinion.

Harry H

3,748 posts

184 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Always loved these flawed or not.

Would be in my Euro millions garage

anixie

27 posts

125 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Seems to have a black interior with red stitching...

e635815

379 posts

216 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
The engines for the McLaren AMG car were tested on two Cerberas.
AMG Engineers were looking for a front engined car, capable of handling the speed, not too expensive and easily modifiable to welcome the engine.
The Cerbi was the only offering on the market at the time.
I saw these two test cars rotting away on their car park together with a BMW M3 and Porsche Cayenne which had its turbos taken away for tests...

QuattroDave

1,816 posts

156 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
e635815 said:
The engines for the McLaren AMG car were tested on two Cerberas.
AMG Engineers were looking for a front engined car, capable of handling the speed, not too expensive and easily modifiable to welcome the engine.
The Cerbi was the only offering on the market at the time.
I saw these two test cars rotting away on their car park together with a BMW M3 and Porsche Cayenne which had its turbos taken away for tests...
It's a real shame these sort of cars don't get looked after or sold. I can see why a company doesn't do either but it doesn't make it any less sad.

Largechris

2,019 posts

119 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Always thought these were willfully ugly and pointless, but still strangely compelling, definitely now a classic. The side strakes are some of the best on any car, ever.

Numeric

1,499 posts

179 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
I remember once driving a base model Rover 75 which was one of the development cars for the V8 programme, for sheer amusing noises from unknown source moments I would have loved it - but the great crusher was soon to have its way.

Oddest one for me was a Z3M breadvan in puke yellow (think that horrid orangy colour they did on the Polo once) which lurked in the BMW UK Braknell car park for a bit, I asked if I could buy it already man mathsing the respray but they said it was to be terminated because of the colour. I did wonder if someone else was eying it up though....

Turbobanana

8,278 posts

229 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Largechris said:
Always thought these were willfully ugly and pointless, but still strangely compelling, definitely now a classic. The side strakes are some of the best on any car, ever.
Agree on all counts, but would add that exhausts exiting ahead of the driver are always a win.

Krikkit

27,930 posts

209 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Always loved the SLR - the original reviews came out and I thought it looked great, then a few weeks later I was passed by one at full chat. Incredible.

Largechris

2,019 posts

119 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
Largechris said:
Always thought these were willfully ugly and pointless, but still strangely compelling, definitely now a classic. The side strakes are some of the best on any car, ever.
Agree on all counts, but would add that exhausts exiting ahead of the driver are always a win.
That's true as well, didn't that all change / get prevented by law since then, I could be misremembering.

Unfortunately the SLR brand was damaged by that clown Prince Naseem.

WCZ

11,454 posts

222 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Largechris said:
Unfortunately the SLR brand was damaged by that clown Prince Naseem.
it's long forgotten about now tbh, they are classics.

I drove one at near 200mph back when they first came out, the sound was incredible and the road presence is huge

the one to go for (funds permitted) is the MSO version.

Manny Khoshbin has around 10 SLR's in his collection now!

Largechris

2,019 posts

119 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
WCZ said:
Largechris said:
Unfortunately the SLR brand was damaged by that clown Prince Naseem.
it's long forgotten about now tbh, they are classics.
Clearly not lol

Lord_Howit_Hertz

1,971 posts

245 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Always like these, more so when a chap called Oliver Morley pulled up to my office in one, incredible presence!

I also remember a long time ago, a PHer (name was something like JasonSRT10 for those old enough and may remember) who swapped his Pagani Zonda for one of these.

Every day a journey

3,051 posts

66 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Not really a Merc fan but absolutely loved the SLR when it came out, especially with the turbofan wheels.

My son's reaction to it when he saw it ( he was not quite 3) was 'Naughty car'. He had a point!




TyrannosauRoss Lex

36,729 posts

240 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
Every day a journey said:
Not really a Merc fan but absolutely loved the SLR when it came out, especially with the turbofan wheels.

My son's reaction to it when he saw it ( he was not quite 3) was 'Naughty car'. He had a point!



Must admit the Stirling Moss editions never did it for me. Bit too ugly, unlike the regular car.

Every day a journey

3,051 posts

66 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
This was next to it... possibly the same car in the Ad??



Oh, not sure on the colour on this one...


juice

9,838 posts

310 months

Tuesday 9th November 2021
quotequote all
The spark plug change cost is absolutely eye-watering . But I guess if you could afford one of these, then 10K for the spark plugs to be changed is a drop in the ocean.