RE: 2022 Mercedes-AMG C43 gets 402hp four-pot
RE: 2022 Mercedes-AMG C43 gets 402hp four-pot
Wednesday 27th April 2022

2022 Mercedes-AMG C43 gets 402hp four-pot

Electric turbo, all-wheel drive, all-wheel steer - Mercedes-AMG throws kitchen sink at M340i rival



It was only a matter of time before Mercedes-AMG's spiffy four-cylinder engine was shared with other models following its debut in the new SL 43. After all the unit has many things in its favour: a novel electric exhaust-gas turbocharger for improved performance; a 48-volt electrical system that permits mild hybrid functionality; and, of course, two fewer cylinders than the 3.0-litre motor that previously powered the mid-tier C43 saloon and wagon.

Of course, that was a sonorous V6, and proved no slouch in the last generation C-Class. But with 402hp and 369lb ft of torque on tap (the former a slight improvement on the six; the latter, a slight reduction) Mercedes-AMG clearly feels like it has delivered a longitudinally-mounted 2.0-litre engine capable of filling the larger capacity shoes of its predecessor. The 1765kg saloon is said to hit 60mph in 'approximately' 4.6 seconds. And that's brisk in anyone's book.

Naturally it helps that you also get a) AMG's nine-speed Speedshift MCT overseeing the upshifts, and b) the 4Matic all-wheel drive system marshalling the delivery. As before, the C43 defaults to a 31/69 per cent torque split, so the model ought to feel rear-biased whether you opt for saloon or estate. And, as you might expect, the manufacturer has also gently overhauled the latest C-Class chassis, providing the C43 with bespoke steering knuckles and suspension joints on the double wishbone front axle, and making three-stage adaptive dampers standard fit.



It has also taken the unusual and possibly telling decision to equip the new car with rear-axle steering without requiring customers to resort to the cost-option list. Unsurprisingly, AMG suggests this delivers a 'significantly more agile turn-in', and is apparently tailored to respond differently depending which one of five drive modes you're in. The latest variable geometry, three-stage AMG parameter steering system is tuned to function in much the same way.

Factor in uprated 370mm, six-piston brakes and a punchier exhaust, and plainly there is no shortfall in whizz-bang tech. And while the latest C-Class is perhaps not the most compelling car to look at, it can at least said to be enhanced by the new grille, front and rear bumper, side sills and twin-tailpipes the C43 introduces. You can have 18-inch wheels if you wish, but expect 19s and 20s to be the norm. Inside there is the usual smattering of badges and sportier trim - as well as shortcut AMG mode buttons on the steering wheel.

Obviously we wouldn't put our money where our mouths are just yet (not least because Mercedes-AMG has confirmed precisely how much money we're talking about just yet - and there's still a new C63 to come), but on paper the C43 - particularly in crowd-pleasing wagon format - does appear to tick many desirable boxes. It won't be easy prising anyone from the equivalent BMW M340i, a model which retains a 3.0-litre straight-six, but if the new turbo inside the M139l engine lives up to its Formula 1-derivative billing, Mercedes-AMG might have successfully replaced one of its most liveable - and likeable - products.









Author
Discussion

novus

Original Poster:

222 posts

191 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Feel like there won’t be many more comparisons like this in the next few years

lotus116tornado

340 posts

183 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Four-pot = Tinpot


Water Fairy

6,652 posts

186 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Looks pretty good in estate guise but, a 4 banger in a C Class AMG...................... no thanks.

redroadster

1,886 posts

263 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Pity dinasour era over the previous V8 sounds will be missed, fuel economy welcomed though.

Kipsrs

727 posts

80 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Other than the two slabs in the cockpit it looks a pretty good proposition, I’m not usually a fan of estate cars but I have to say, that looks damned handsome?
I can’t see the problem with the amount of cylinders a car has, 4,5,6,8,10,12 . . so long as it produces horses and torque - Admittedly we all like to hear good old rumble or wail but I’m sure the exhaust note from this will put a smile on our faces, it’s AMG after all!

Stoned

119 posts

160 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
How does a 4 pot so completely fill the engine bay?! It's like that made the engine cover extra large so you don't think about the smaller engine so much.

anonymous-user

85 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Dropped 2 cylinders yet it’s 75kg heavier than the predecessor…

GravelBen

16,551 posts

261 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
I'm feeling nostalgic for the days when the model name actually reflected the engine size. The C43 had a 4.3 V8, the E55 had a 5.5 V8, the C32 had a 3.2 V6 etc... Back when things were a bit more honest.

I guess C20 doesn't have quite the same ring to it.

samoht

7,322 posts

177 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Feel like the I4 makes it more of a rival for a hot Golf, and tends to increase the overlap with the A35/45 derivatives. If you don't get a big engine then you're missing one of the key benefits of this class of car over hot-hatch based stuff.

Kipsrs said:
I can’t see the problem with the amount of cylinders a car has, 4,5,6,8,10,12 . . so long as it produces horses and torque
The more cylinders, the more smaller explosions per crank rotation. So any four-cylinder is less smooth than a six or eight.

Additionally, an inline four suffers from unbalanced lateral vibrations, so as you rev it up it sends vibrations through the chassis. In an inline six like the BMW equivalent, these cancel out among the six cylinders, making the redline a pleasant place to hang out, rather than an uncomfortable one. Crossplane crank V8s as used to be synonymous with the AMG logo have two I4s at 90 degrees, and have counterweights on the crank which perfectly balance out the opposite cylinders, again letting them rev out smoothly.

The final point is throttle response, with a turbo you have to learn to anticipate the lag, although IMO this isn't a big deal with modern engines.

Kipsrs said:
Admittedly we all like to hear good old rumble or wail but I’m sure the exhaust note from this will put a smile on our faces, it’s AMG after all!
It'll sound like all the other turbo fours, more or less.

But there's nothing like the feeling of going for an overtake in your family wagon, and suddenly you're Tom Cruise in Days of Thunder, going high at Daytona.

Andy83n

612 posts

93 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
I'm feeling nostalgic for the days when the model name actually reflected the engine size. The C43 had a 4.3 V8, the E55 had a 5.5 V8, the C32 had a 3.2 V6 etc... Back when things were a bit more honest.

I guess C20 doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
And how would you then differentiate between the vast swathe of models across the model range with a 2.0 4-pot, albeit with different power putputs.



Ray_Aber

981 posts

307 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Both cars look good from the back, then you get round to the front to be met with the doleful expression of Droopy combined with a fish (specifically, a grouper). It's a deal breaker for me.

the engine? I'm not bothered that it's a 4 cyl. Volvos have been powered by four-pots for ages now.

dpop

300 posts

163 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Hands-down the worst dashboard in its class for a good few years running now

TyrannosauRoss Lex

36,729 posts

243 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Kipsrs said:
Other than the two slabs in the cockpit it looks a pretty good proposition, I’m not usually a fan of estate cars but I have to say, that looks damned handsome?
I can’t see the problem with the amount of cylinders a car has, 4,5,6,8,10,12 . . so long as it produces horses and torque - Admittedly we all like to hear good old rumble or wail but I’m sure the exhaust note from this will put a smile on our faces, it’s AMG after all!
Each to their own, but there is a distinct way an engine with more cylinders drives. A 4 cylinder engine will never be as smooth as a straight 6, for example.

fantheman80

2,686 posts

80 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Kipsrs said:
I can’t see the problem with the amount of cylinders a car has, 4,5,6,8,10,12 . . so long as it produces horses and torque - Admittedly we all like to hear good old rumble or wail but I’m sure the exhaust note from this will put a smile on our faces, it’s AMG after all!
You have not heard the 2.0 litre in an AMG35/45 then....due to the OPF they sound very poor. No more pops and bangs that were a given with AMG and whether you like those or not, it added some character

otolith

69,669 posts

235 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
No nice noise, but gobs of efficient torque and power. Next improvement will be an electric drivetrain which will at least remove the nasty noise.

TyrannosauRoss Lex

36,729 posts

243 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
otolith said:
No nice noise, but gobs of efficient torque and power. Next improvement will be an electric drivetrain which will at least remove the nasty noise.
Yep, I'd rather electric to a 4 pot, personally. 6+ cylinders maybe different, depending on the car! Sports car I'd take the engine, luxo barge....electric!

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

265 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
As appealing as being kicked in the nuts.

Limpet

6,628 posts

192 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
Softening the blow of the move to electric power.


pSyCoSiS

4,343 posts

236 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
It's a shame that cylinders are dropping, but that's the way the world is going and we have to accept it.

The power output is very impressive as will be the other stats. However, you cannot beat the sound and rumble of a proper V8.

To those (including myself) bemoaning the cylinder drop, go and buy / enjoy the larger capacity engines whilst you still can. They won't be around forever - when ULEZ zones expand and also fuel prices get higher, these engines will ultimately accept some form of defeat.

Until then, fk it and live life a little!

SDK

3,759 posts

284 months

Wednesday 27th April 2022
quotequote all
samoht said:
So any four-cylinder is less smooth than a six or eight.

The final point is throttle response, with a turbo you have to learn to anticipate the lag, although IMO this isn't a big deal with modern engines.
Smoothness and instant throttle response - sounds just like the elements an EV provides smile