RE: 2025 Mercedes-AMG GT55 | UK Review

RE: 2025 Mercedes-AMG GT55 | UK Review

Yesterday

2025 Mercedes-AMG GT55 | UK Review

If you want a V8 in a GT but not several hundred horsepower, might the 55 fit the bill?


If imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery, there must be some faces blushing on the Porsche side of Stuttgart. Having retired the idea of a rear-wheel drive, transaxled sports car in place of a 2+2 with a cushy auto and, in most models, four-wheel drive, Mercedes-AMG is now going all out on its Porsche 911 copycatting. By offering a model for just about everybody. There’s a track focused one, a wildly powerful flagship (that incorporates PHEV technology), a brace of familiar nameplates, a convertible - in the form of the SL - and even the 2.0-litre GT 43. Suffice it to say that those that like the idea of an AMG GT in 2025 will find a variant that tickles their pickle, from the 381hp four-cylinder all the way to an electrified V8 with more than twice that output. 

So much like the rear-engined Porsche icon, there’s a lot of AMG GT to get your head around these days. But the 55, tested here in the UK for the first time, is perhaps the model that holds the most interest. As the name suggests, it has a V8, the venerable 4.0-litre twin turbo, but here in a relatively modest state of tune - just the 476hp. While ‘modest’ and ‘476hp’ aren’t often found in the same sentence, that is just 55hp more than found in an A45. And 0-62mph in 3.9 seconds is borderline laggardly in the era of the super EV. But for those of us as bothered by the experience as the raw stats, the promise of V8 theatre without unusably wild acceleration sounds quite nice. And it keeps the GT, in list price at least, below £150,000. That feels like quite an important threshold. 

It says something of the AMG’s kerb appeal that the engine really is a secondary concern when presented with a GT. A 2.0-litre would most certainly do the job if the main objective is looking good, the AMG two-door chiselled, handsome, and - perhaps just as crucially - not another Porsche 911 that someone thinks is interesting because it’s Aventurine Green. Having a long nose and a short rump clearly isn’t a new sports car recipe, but it’s been honed really nicely here. The Benz is leaner and meaner than something like a Continental GT, a whole heap more desirable (to these eyes) than a Maserati GranTurismo and, if not quite in the same league as an Aston DB12 for sheer want-one desirability, not very far off either. 

Naturally, this wouldn’t be a modern Mercedes review without mention of the interior. While some will still be aghast at the presence of such a large screen (a 911 doesn’t have to share its interior look with a £50k saloon, notably), Mercedes UX does work pretty well with a bit of familiarity. A suave leather colour works wonders for the ambience, and this GT cabin feels well screwed together too. Alright, the paddles could be nicer. But, overall, it’s a nice interior to be a part of, ensconced by dash with your bum low.

If a lot of the feel-good vibes of the GT could be shared between 2.0-litre and 4.0-litre models, starting up the latter will do most of the convincing that it’s worth the extra. Even in more muted form than ever before, this V8 sounds expensive, powerful and thrilling in a way that no four-cylinder could. Perhaps just as crucially, the 55 booms into life just as a more expensive variant might. More theatrically, in fact, given a 63 E Performance will often come to life in electric. 

This 55 gives up well over 300hp to the PHEV, however, which makes mincemeat of a 200kg weight difference when it comes to raw speed. This weighs the same frankly astonishing 2,120kg (EU) as a 585hp ‘63, too, so can’t boast the same indefatigable strength of acceleration. But you know what? It’s more than enough. And actually, in a less potent state of tune than in cars like the Aston DB12, the 4.0-litre feels keener, zestier and more responsive than when the boost is bumped.

There’s still some lag, and it wants a couple of thousand on the tacho before getting to work, but with less of a whack in the back when it comes, the V8 actually seems a little more energetic despite less power. That impression may well be helped by the best installation yet of this nine-speed auto, with clever logic left in auto and a willingness to permit downshifts that’ll register almost 7,000rpm. A third gear that’s done by 80mph makes the ‘55 feel more than accelerative enough, too. Realistically, few will crave any more performance.

This being 2025, the sounds heard inside a GT55 probably aren’t the most natural. That being said, it always seems convincingly V8 enough - even if the overrun crackles feel very contrived - and nicer to listen to than any current Porsche flat six (other than those that go to 9,000rpm). Maybe the rumbles and growls and burps are a tad synthetic, but they’re pretty good as this sort of thing goes. When that great prow rises ahead, the rear squats down and the gearbox is firing through upchanges, it all feels very AMG V8 from the driver’s seat.

Even to a car writer more familiar than most with crazy car kerb weights, the 55’s comes as a shock. Partly because it’s hard to get your head around a two-door, two-tonne AMG GT, but mainly because it really, truthfully drives like a car that weighs hundreds of kilos less. The damping of the AMG Ride Control really is exceptional, managing mass adroitly whatever the scenario. Comfort suits for most situations, though just occasionally you can feel the body get away a tad; Sport tacks those movements down more convincingly. Even Sport+ and Race don’t entirely abandon ride comfort, while introducing additional discipline. 

Furthermore, while it sounds silly to say about a twin-turbo, 4WD Mercedes that weighs so much, it’s a relatively simple GT by the standards of the range. The sensation of the four-wheel steering and the brake pedal is nicer than in the hybrid E Performance, the former in particular probably Merc’s best installation yet. It’s still a little spooky at low speed, then really reassuring at more GT-appropriate velocities. 

The entire experience is a supremely enjoyable one, in fact, especially so given you aren’t accidentally doing 110mph all the time. As may happen in many more potent sports cars, hybridised 911 included. Obviously this isn’t a delicate, tactile two-door V8, but with a little more feel and a little more flow than the all-conquering hybrid it’s a really nice drive. And seriously capable, too, absorbing bumps and consuming direction changes with aplomb. If large, too; the GT never feels anything approaching unwieldy or cumbersome. 

It certainly cruises more calmly than a Carrera despite similarly broad 305-section rear tyres, which must count for something, even if - you knew this bit was coming - the AMG can’t quite match the Porsche for outright poise and precision. There isn’t quite the same stability and confidence under braking, presumably a tell of the weight, while a strange bit of fight from the front end under power can undermine the entertainment. The seamlessness and cohesion of a Porsche, be that how a 4WD system apportions power or how a steering rear axle is incorporated, isn’t quite here. Really close, but not quite. 

Nevertheless, the AMG GT remains properly persuasive in 55 form. It’s fast, it sounds good, it drives really nicely in all situations and it looks a million dollars. A quick blast isn’t enough to properly assess its everyday credentials, whether those rear seats really are of any use and if 20mpg is merely hopeful or pure fantasy, but there’s a really smart blend of Mercedes plushness and AMG purpose here. If a 911 isn’t for you, this currently (and comfortably) feels like the best of the alternatives. Even if you’re plumping for the Porsche, have a go in the AMG first. Just to be sure. It really is that good.  


SPECIFICATION | 2025 MERCEDES-AMG GT 55 4MATIC+ PREMIUM PLUS

Engine: 3,982cc, twin-turbo V8
Transmission: 9-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 476@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 516@ 2,250-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 3.9 seconds
Top speed: 183mph
Weight: 2,120kg (EU)
MPG: 20.2 (WLTP)
CO2: 319g/km (WLTP)
Price: £148,300 (price as standard; price as tested £151,210, comprising 21-inch AMG forged alloy wheels for £410 and Driving Assistance Package for £2,500)

Author
Discussion

ChevronB19

Original Poster:

7,318 posts

176 months

Yesterday (09:52)
quotequote all
I actually prefer the looks of this to the current 911, which has gone too far away from its origins of being (relatively) small.

Yes, I know it takes some elements from the 911, but you can still see elements of the 50’s cars.

Geoffcapes

908 posts

177 months

Yesterday (10:00)
quotequote all
It looks nice. But at 150 grand and it has only a little more power than the 2009 Maserati Granturismo I used to have that you can get for 25 grand now, means that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

dbs2000

2,733 posts

205 months

Yesterday (10:03)
quotequote all
Why are these cars so damn heavy?!

mooseracer

2,307 posts

183 months

Yesterday (10:08)
quotequote all
Geoffcapes said:
It looks nice. But at 150 grand and it has only a little more power than the 2009 Maserati Granturismo I used to have that you can get for 25 grand now, means that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
Stage 2 Golf R and a house

Justin-ow582

380 posts

118 months

Yesterday (10:13)
quotequote all
It's odd. I'm sure it's an amazing car and a great GT but I'm not going to be the only one thinking that the rear 1/3 side profile looks like a 911, the rear end is starting to look more like a slimmed-down Vantage and the gopping front grille is an apparent attempt to one-up AUDI.

Couple with that the screen-oriented interior, usually with an accompanying LED lightshow, a rather hideous dashboard display ("gashboard" seems more appropriate) and too many buttons on the steering wheel it's as if they've picked all of the options that I personally dislike about modern cars. But that could just be me.

The V8 option is appreciated, whilst it's still legal, but whilst Mercedes traditionally delivered the soundtrack, by the sound of it (pun intended), the piped-in audio would be another strike against it for me.

I also wonder if a 9 speed auto really need paddles or just a post-drive hand massage and an RSI risk waiver?
For the one car that I had with paddles, which had a measley 6 gears, that was plenty enough to be able to keep the revs in the optimum powerband.


Edited by Justin-ow582 on Thursday 8th May 10:24

SDK

1,554 posts

266 months

Yesterday (10:13)
quotequote all
Geoffcapes said:
It looks nice. But at 150 grand and it has only a little more power than the 2009 Maserati Granturismo I used to have that you can get for 25 grand now, means that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
This is the reality of new car prices today.

e.g.

Basic entry level VW Golf 1.5L petrol : £36k
Petrol Skoda Kodiak vRS (245bhp) : £52k +options
BMW i5 M60 : £98k +options
Merc AMG GT : £148k +options
Aston Martin DB12 : £190k +options
Ferrari 296 : £250k +options

theicemario

1,048 posts

88 months

Yesterday (10:15)
quotequote all
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-germancars/mer...

MERCEDES-AMG GT
Engine: 3,982cc V8, turbocharged
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 462@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 443@1,600-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.0sec (claimed)
Top speed: 189mph (claimed)
Weight: 1,540kg (DIN, without driver, 1,615kg to EU)
MPG: 30.4mpg (claimed)
CO2: 216g/km
Price: £97,195

A whole half a tonne heavier and 50 grand more expensive than the AMG GT of 10 years back. Mental

Edited by theicemario on Thursday 8th May 10:17

andy43

11,301 posts

267 months

Yesterday (10:30)
quotequote all
Still heavy, still expensive, still not quite there on the looks, but as far as the current range goes I think this is the pick of the bunch. Proper engine, no electrical gubbins, and probably just as tuneable/exhaustaudioable (new word) as the old ones.

SDK

1,554 posts

266 months

Yesterday (10:32)
quotequote all
theicemario said:
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-germancars/mer...

MERCEDES-AMG GT
Engine: 3,982cc V8, turbocharged
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 462@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 443@1,600-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.0sec (claimed)
Top speed: 189mph (claimed)
Weight: 1,540kg (DIN, without driver, 1,615kg to EU)
MPG: 30.4mpg (claimed)
CO2: 216g/km
Price: £97,195

A whole half a tonne heavier and 50 grand more expensive than the AMG GT of 10 years back. Mental

Edited by theicemario on Thursday 8th May 10:17
General inflation accounts for most of the price increase



Also, an additonal £5.5k will be the first year VED (started from April 2025) and the luxury car tax is also included in the price of this new model (started April 2017)


Buying a new car now attracts a lot of tax

-> 20% VAT
-> BIK tax : 3% to 39% of the car value, which is set on top of the VAT included price (depending on CO2 output) [Company purchases]
-> 1st year VED which is up to £5.5k for a high performance car
-> Ongoing VED at £195 per year
-> Expensive car supplement : £425 a year for the first 6 years.


Edited by SDK on Thursday 8th May 11:05

ArmaghMan

2,598 posts

193 months

Yesterday (10:44)
quotequote all
Geoffcapes said:
It looks nice. But at 150 grand and it has only a little more power than the 2009 Maserati Granturismo I used to have that you can get for 25 grand now, means that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
And less power than my 2002 Sl55, which was 15 grand.
Not really seeing your point here.

cerb4.5lee

36,165 posts

193 months

Yesterday (10:49)
quotequote all
I really like these a lot. smokin

Davey S2

13,272 posts

267 months

Yesterday (10:55)
quotequote all
I'd far rather the old model GTR.

£110K buys a great spec, low miles car.

croyde

24,554 posts

243 months

Yesterday (11:00)
quotequote all
Interior ruined by that massive screen.

Is there a version with a lot of those little metal switches with labels made by an old Dymo printer biggrin

fantheman80

1,875 posts

62 months

Yesterday (11:03)
quotequote all
really good looking car, and not many V8s left in this world. Id prob still go for a Porsche but well played mercedes.

Fox-

13,432 posts

259 months

Yesterday (11:13)
quotequote all
SDK said:
This is the reality of new car prices today.

e.g.

Basic entry level VW Golf 1.5L petrol : £36k
Petrol Skoda Kodiak vRS (245bhp) : £52k +options
BMW i5 M60 : £98k +options
Merc AMG GT : £148k +options
Aston Martin DB12 : £190k +options
Ferrari 296 : £250k +options
You mean it's the reality of new car list prices today.

It's taken me about 3 minutes to find a quote for that BMW to supply a new factory order for almost £20,000 less than the price you quote above.

As for the Golf, just found a 1.5 litre entry level Golf at £22k for a brand new car. That seems like excellent value. We really need to stop taking these list prices so seriously in these threads because they are often not at all reflective of how much a new car actually costs.

Edited by Fox- on Thursday 8th May 11:15

J4CKO

43,938 posts

213 months

Yesterday (11:26)
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I really like these a lot. smokin
Yeah, they look great but that weight is offputting, and that doesnt really usually bother me but that is ridiculous and seems wrong for a slinky looking car like that.

Thats 200 kilos more than my massive barge of a Jag, and it renders the Power to weight ratio as looking a bit meh for 150 grand, 476 bhp doesnt sound too bad, but when its got to shift over two tons it doesnt seem as appealing.

Can get a 2016 for forty something grand and up, always seems like a pretty good value for what is a fairly exotic looking car, I love a 911 but these are more interesting in that price bracket, and much less common.


cerb4.5lee

36,165 posts

193 months

Yesterday (11:29)
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
cerb4.5lee said:
I really like these a lot. smokin
Yeah, they look great but that weight is offputting, and that doesnt really usually bother me but that is ridiculous and seems wrong for a slinky looking car like that.

Thats 200 kilos more than my massive barge of a Jag, and it renders the Power to weight ratio as looking a bit meh for 150 grand, 476 bhp doesnt sound too bad, but when its got to shift over two tons it doesnt seem as appealing.

Can get a 2016 for forty something grand and up, always seems like a pretty good value for what is a fairly exotic looking car, I love a 911 but these are more interesting in that price bracket, and much less common.
I've always loved the first generation GT as well. Plus they seem really good value as you say. If I could get one in the garage(I can't because they're too wide though), I'd definitely have one by now I think. My missus loves them too, and that always helps with the buying decisions I've found as well.

SDK

1,554 posts

266 months

Yesterday (11:29)
quotequote all
Fox- said:
You mean it's the reality of new car list prices today.

It's taken me about 3 minutes to find a quote for that BMW to supply a new factory order for almost £20,000 less than the price you quote above.

As for the Golf, just found a 1.5 litre entry level Golf at £22k for a brand new car. That seems like excellent value. We really need to stop taking these list prices so seriously in these threads because they are often not at all reflective of how much a new car actually costs.

Edited by Fox- on Thursday 8th May 11:15
Yep- they are the list prices, obviously discounts are available.

Most of the tax is based on the list price and when the media report on the state of the UK and global car market they references losses, which includes the loss of selling a car at the discounted price vs the RRP price.

Firebobby

780 posts

52 months

Yesterday (11:30)
quotequote all
mooseracer said:
Geoffcapes said:
It looks nice. But at 150 grand and it has only a little more power than the 2009 Maserati Granturismo I used to have that you can get for 25 grand now, means that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
Stage 2 Golf R and a house
Hmm! £50k for a half decent spec boring golf, that leaves £100k for a house! I don't know where you live but £100k isn't going to get you a house in a habitable condition where I live.

DeuceDeuce

471 posts

105 months

Yesterday (11:51)
quotequote all
Interesting. Do you think the back with the seats down is adequate for a 14kg dog and a couple of bags for European road trips?