Them E Types

Author
Discussion

BBS-LM

Original Poster:

3,978 posts

237 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Bloody hell them E Type are just a little fast aren't they. I had one tonight blast past me so I thought I would do the right thing and have a closer look, I could just about keep up, and the noise the car was making was glorious , well it's not everyday you get to see one of these car going flat out, it was a privilege to witness, made my night that did.

Jw Vw

4,877 posts

176 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Very nice cars, make a glorious sound too! How fast was it going?

BBS-LM

Original Poster:

3,978 posts

237 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Jw Vw said:
Very nice cars, make a glorious sound too! How fast was it going?
Fast, very fast?

poo at Paul's

14,417 posts

188 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
150mph werent they? A lot on skinny crossplys!!

Not so hot as modern stuff on the turns mind!!

Burrito

1,705 posts

233 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
I spent a day driving around Cornwall in one. They're not really fast by today's standard, but certainly an enjoyable drive. It wasn't my car so I was being gentle mind.

The noise, the smell and the sense of occasion was fantastic. And it was beautiful. A great day. smile

varsas

4,064 posts

215 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
I've just bought an XJ6 with the same engine had had my preconceptions blow away. That's fast enough (you'd have to push my BMW 328i very hard indeed to keep up) so with a manual gearbox, triple carbs and little less weight E-types must be pretty quick. Imagine what they were like in 1961 when most people were driving round in 850cc Mini's and sports cars had 70odd bhp.

WreckedGecko

1,191 posts

214 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
My father had one a few years ago. A 4.2 V12 '73 I think. Was great fun, but more then a bit squishy in the corners. I managed to munch the auto gearbox after a "spirited" drive one afternoon. I stil dont think he has forgiven me.

John D.

19,036 posts

222 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
I had a play with a red E Type just outside Petworth last year. Overtook in my Elise and then he hung on very well for a couple of miles. I was surprised how quick it was through a few sweeping bends. Was quite fun until I had to brake quite hard for another car pulling out which hadn't seen me - quick mental calculations of how effective 1960s brakes + narrow tyres would be had me watching my mirrors!! Fortunately he had left a sensible gap smile

TRUENOSAM

763 posts

183 months

Saturday 2nd April 2011
quotequote all
Where they not the worlds fastest production car when released?

Got to admit they look great at full speed as they do staionary. Not nice cars to drive though. Especialy if you have feet over size 7

ChevronB19

7,344 posts

176 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
150mph werent they? A lot on skinny crossplys!!

Not so hot as modern stuff on the turns mind!!
Not in original spec they weren't. The famous top speed test was rigged with a tweaked car. But they are great cars, suffered a bit from bloat in later versions though. Would love a lightweight!

eldar

23,491 posts

209 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
ChevronB19 said:
Not in original spec they weren't. The famous top speed test was rigged with a tweaked car. But they are great cars, suffered a bit from bloat in later versions though. Would love a lightweight!
The early ones were good for about 125mph, which was fecking fast 50 years ago, and braked well. Didn't handle that well, and had zero rust proofing. Looked like sex on wheelssmile

Exoticaholic

1,060 posts

225 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
I had a ride in a dark blue roadster in 1986 in London. It concided perfectly with a wickedly sunny day and the feeling was awesome.

It was the time when congestion charging, biased timing of traffic lights and that little toad didn't get a look in.

Baz Tench

5,648 posts

203 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
WreckedGecko said:
My father had one a few years ago. A 4.2 V12 '73 I think. Was great fun, but more then a bit squishy in the corners. I managed to munch the auto gearbox after a "spirited" drive one afternoon. I stil dont think he has forgiven me.
The '73 would have been the 5.3 V12. Earlier ones were 3.8, then 4.2 straight sixes. Glorious things those XK engines were! smile

LuS1fer

42,334 posts

258 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
I had a blast with on around 1996. It was an Old English White FHC and a V12 and I was in my 1985 Corvette. We covered many a high speed mile and I was quite surprised by how well it went north of 120mph. I passed him eventually when he pulled off. It was nice to observe it in action (unlike a later V12 XJS in a similar scenario which died with a shower of sparks from the exhaust).

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

274 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
eldar said:
The early ones were good for about 125mph, which was fecking fast 50 years ago, and braked well. Didn't handle that well, and had zero rust proofing. Looked like sex on wheelssmile
They were relatively cheap as well, £2100 at launch. In todays money that's BMW Z4 territory rather than XK8.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

195 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
I had the use of a V12 coupe back in the 80's wonderfull cars , i would love to try a Mk 1 4.2 smile

Smike

23,738 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd April 2011
quotequote all
ChevronB19 said:
Not in original spec they weren't. The famous top speed test was rigged with a tweaked car. But they are great cars, suffered a bit from bloat in later versions though. Would love a lightweight!
The 3.8 Autocar Test car did 0-100 in 16.2 seconds

WreckedGecko

1,191 posts

214 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Baz Tench said:
The '73 would have been the 5.3 V12. Earlier ones were 3.8, then 4.2 straight sixes. Glorious things those XK engines were! smile
Funny thing is I have a picture somewhere of the 4.2 and V12 badge on the back, but according to Wikipedia etc, the S3 V12s were all 5.3... Strange. Will have to ask the old man. That it was a V12 I am certain of, but then thats quite a bit eaiser to tell then the capacity!

LuS1fer

42,334 posts

258 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
WreckedGecko said:
Baz Tench said:
The '73 would have been the 5.3 V12. Earlier ones were 3.8, then 4.2 straight sixes. Glorious things those XK engines were! smile
Funny thing is I have a picture somewhere of the 4.2 and V12 badge on the back, but according to Wikipedia etc, the S3 V12s were all 5.3... Strange. Will have to ask the old man. That it was a V12 I am certain of, but then thats quite a bit eaiser to tell then the capacity!
The Jaguar V12 has always been 5.3 and I believe went to 6.0 in certain versions later. The 3.4 and 4.2 were always sixes.

varsas

4,064 posts

215 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
WreckedGecko said:
Baz Tench said:
The '73 would have been the 5.3 V12. Earlier ones were 3.8, then 4.2 straight sixes. Glorious things those XK engines were! smile
Funny thing is I have a picture somewhere of the 4.2 and V12 badge on the back, but according to Wikipedia etc, the S3 V12s were all 5.3... Strange. Will have to ask the old man. That it was a V12 I am certain of, but then thats quite a bit eaiser to tell then the capacity!
The Jaguar V12 has always been 5.3 and I believe went to 6.0 in certain versions later. The 3.4 and 4.2 were always sixes.
In road cars, the V12 was 5.3 from 1973(ish) to 1992(ish, can't remember exact dates) with carbs until 1976ish, fuel injection after. The heads were changed significantly in 1981 to aid part throttle economy.

There were two 6 litre engines, the TWR one used in a very few Jaguar XJS's in the late 1980's and the 'normal' Jaguar 6 litre used in the later XJS's and the X300/XJ40 variant XJ12/daimler double 6.

Other sizes have been made by Jaguar and others for racing, certainly up to 7.3 litre is possible.

Interesting stuff:
http://www.jagweb.com/aj6eng/v12_performance.php