RE: Extraordinary Ford GT X1 by Bell for sale
RE: Extraordinary Ford GT X1 by Bell for sale
Saturday 2nd August

Extraordinary Ford GT X1 by Bell for sale

A mid-engined roadster that's, rare, red, V8 powered - and very much not a Ferrari


It can be hard to recall, all these years later, just what an impact the Ford GT had. Back when £100,000 supercars had 400hp or so, the Ford packed 550hp of supercharged swagger; even the Lamborghini Gallardo, complete with big V10, couldn’t match the GT for sheer muscle. But the real genius of the package was that it wasn’t merely some cynical cash-in or just a horsepower champ - the GT was a straight-up hero. 

Even as a LHD-only prospect, and larger than was probably ideal for our roads, it was adored by those who drove it in the UK. Nobody expected it to be sub-par, exactly - but few would have reckoned on Ford creating such a deft, lithe, communicative mid-engined V8. One that, let’s not forget, looked crazily good as well. So it's no wonder GTs are still worth comfortably more than twice (sometimes three times) what those lucky UK buyers paid 20 or so years ago  - they’re properly special cars. And while we’d more commonly associate limited editions with the later V6 GT - from Alan Mann to MkIV and Carbon Series to LM - there were undoubtedly some cool spin-offs of the V8. Remember, for example, the GTX1?

First shown by Ford at SEMA in 2005, the X1 was Blue Oval engineer Kip Ewing’s take on what a modern version of the GT40 X-1 could look like. That original car was an experimental, aluminium chassis’d GT40 Roadster built by McLaren, and which actually won at Sebring in 1966 - a lesser-known and very cool part of the GT40 story. Such was the understandable reaction to the 21st-century reimagining that around 40 units of the GT production run (it’s believed to be 38) were given the X1 treatment through Genaddi Design Group.

What makes this GT extra interesting is that it looks like an X1, but it isn’t. Well, not exactly. Because while it very much is a roofless GT, complete with viewing panels in the altered rear deck so the V8 remains on show, it wasn’t built by Genaddi Design Group and isn’t one of the 40 GTX1s. There aren’t the carbon roof panels, for one thing. Instead, this is a GT X1 by Bell, as in Bell Sport and Classic in the UK. Story goes that this car, originally shipped to New York, arrived in London in 2007, its buyer having missed out on the original GTX1 allocation but very much wanting one. So he had Bell Sport and Classic build him one. 

It's likely to cause a stir wherever it ends up, the combination of familiar cues combined with a very seldom-seen body configuration raising it above even the enormous amount of attention a standard GT gets. Having been off the road for a few years, chassis 401202 has been resurrected this year, freshly serviced, recently MOT’d and ready to remind the rest of the world what a proper soft top supercar can do for your soul.  

Interestingly, too, an unofficial GTX1 - thanks as well to a healthy mileage tally of almost 30k - is currently by far the most affordable way into this generation of GT. While cars that have been mollycoddled for two decades can still command almost £400k, this one is £280,000. Still a huge amount of money, clearly, and far beyond what its contemporary rivals are now worth, though also a useful amount less than any coupe currently available on PH. Rarer and cheaper sounds like car collector jackpot, right? 


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

CH80

Original Poster:

176 posts

13 months

Unofficial chop shop for £280k? No thanks.

CountyLines

3,182 posts

19 months

With no roof.

Iamnotkloot

1,715 posts

163 months

It looks very pretty and has a hint of Italian styling to it

LotusOmega375D

8,818 posts

169 months

CountyLines said:
With no roof.
Looks like there’s a rudimentary fabric top.



But chopping the roof of any coupe is a no no for me. I remember a story about the Ferrari Owners Club of America concours ca. 1990. They redirected a chopped aftermarket Daytona Spyder and incorrect shade of yellow 275 GTB to a far flung corner of the display field. Originality matters.

kambites

69,723 posts

237 months

Looks lovely. Is the roof structural on the GT?

wistec1

630 posts

57 months

No no. You don't do that without structural implications surely?

CountyLines

3,182 posts

19 months

kambites said:
Looks lovely. Is the roof structural on the GT?
Its T-Bar roof essentially so yes it must be.

928 GTS

540 posts

111 months

LotusOmega375D said:
But chopping the roof of any coupe is a no no for me. I remember a story about the Ferrari Owners Club of America concours ca. 1990. They redirected a chopped aftermarket Daytona Spyder and incorrect shade of yellow 275 GTB to a far flung corner of the display field. Originality matters.
In eighties it made sense to chop Daytona. Accident damage or rust repair car + $40k and you got money back and then some. Today about 140 chop tops exist and values are barely above similar condition Berlinetta. Meaning 500-600k. Real Spiders are 2m+. Still, I could easily live with well done chop but even they are 5-10 times too expensive. Same thing with this GT. If one simply must have open top driver this is one to get.

GTRene

19,281 posts

240 months

one of my most favorite cars, but... with a roof like the original one.

I look for those almost everyday (ok also many other cars) but prices stay high... from 350k euro to 700k euro

The Pistonsdead

5,367 posts

223 months

CountyLines said:
kambites said:
Looks lovely. Is the roof structural on the GT?
Its T-Bar roof essentially so yes it must be.
Forgive my ignorance, cannot see T Bar in pictures.
A lot of grunt/torque to flex car surely scratchchin

Wheel Turned Out

1,512 posts

54 months

LotusOmega375D said:
CountyLines said:
With no roof.
Looks like there s a rudimentary fabric top.



But chopping the roof of any coupe is a no no for me. I remember a story about the Ferrari Owners Club of America concours ca. 1990. They redirected a chopped aftermarket Daytona Spyder and incorrect shade of yellow 275 GTB to a far flung corner of the display field. Originality matters.
I'm not sure that's entirely representative, the Ferrari world is notoriously more finicky about such things - especially at a concours event.


CountyLines

3,182 posts

19 months

The Pistonsdead said:
CountyLines said:
kambites said:
Looks lovely. Is the roof structural on the GT?
Its a T-Bar roof essentially so yes it must be.
Forgive my ignorance, cannot see T Bar in pictures.
A lot of grunt/torque to flex car surely scratchchin
The original non modified version is essentially a T-Bar because the doors cut into the roof so much.

kambites

69,723 posts

237 months

Wikipedia said:
The resulting chassis is ten percent less stiff than the standard GT
Now being Wikipedia this obviously has to be taken with a healthy dose of scepticism, but if it's correct that's very impressive and probably unnoticeable.

Interesting that it was a Ford blessed project and hence didn't impact the warranty.

kambites

69,723 posts

237 months

CountyLines said:
The original non modified version is essentially a T-Bar because the doors cut into the roof so much.
It seems that this could also be configured as a T-bar - as well as the soft-top there was a removable central beam and a pair of hard panels to go either side of it.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,402 posts

114 months

It you think chopping the roof on that is a little strange, look at the dealers stock and scroll down to the last car - a third gen Alpine convertible!

ducnick

2,061 posts

259 months

Never really got these when you could buy a really nice super performance gt40 for less. At today’s money you could probably get even more for your tool room copy money.

salmanorguk

250 posts

108 months

Probably would have cost more but surely to stand out from the official convertible it would have have been better to create a t-top like the MR2, where the door roof panels are removable but the centre spine is intact?

My imaginary money will be passing on this thanks!

disco666

390 posts

162 months

They would have done better if they had spent the money on a rhd conversion rather than removing the roof.

big_rob_sydney

3,662 posts

210 months

Yesterday (04:46)
quotequote all
Sorry, I'm confused. Is this a kit car?

kambites

69,723 posts

237 months

Yesterday (05:53)
quotequote all
big_rob_sydney said:
Sorry, I'm confused. Is this a kit car?
Sort of. It's a production Ford GT with the roof cut off.

According to Wikipedia, the story is that Ford showed a concept open-top GT at a motor show. People wanted to buy it but Ford didn't want to make it so they paid a coach builder to make it for them. The guy at Ford who developed the concept went on to lead the team at the coach builder who built it for them.

So it was never an official Ford product, but it was initially designed by Ford and they had a small but direct hand in the engineering as well.