330D - Low-mileage E46 vs High-mileage E90
Discussion
Good Morning
I know, you should always buy on condition and not mileage, but there's generally a correlation between the two. A car with over 100k on it is usually going to be a little bit more 'worn' than one with 35k on, for example.
I'm spending a lot of money on fuel at the moment in the Mazda, and every now and then I find myself browsing classifieds like I'm sure we all do. If I had to move to the dark side (diesel) I'd really like a Merc CLS but they're still a bit expensive and I think maybe a bit wafty for me. I've always liked the E46 and I quite like the E90 with a good spec.
So, for the same money, would you go for a nice low-mileage 2004 (for example) E46 or a 2007 model E90 with stellar mileage?
I will probably be adding about 20k miles a year to it myself, and my long-term goal to keep me happy would be to get a Caterfield of sorts for the summer at some point too.
Oh, and is the engine the same in both cars? I know the earlier E46 330d's had less power than the newer ones.
Cheers all
I know, you should always buy on condition and not mileage, but there's generally a correlation between the two. A car with over 100k on it is usually going to be a little bit more 'worn' than one with 35k on, for example.
I'm spending a lot of money on fuel at the moment in the Mazda, and every now and then I find myself browsing classifieds like I'm sure we all do. If I had to move to the dark side (diesel) I'd really like a Merc CLS but they're still a bit expensive and I think maybe a bit wafty for me. I've always liked the E46 and I quite like the E90 with a good spec.
So, for the same money, would you go for a nice low-mileage 2004 (for example) E46 or a 2007 model E90 with stellar mileage?
I will probably be adding about 20k miles a year to it myself, and my long-term goal to keep me happy would be to get a Caterfield of sorts for the summer at some point too.
Oh, and is the engine the same in both cars? I know the earlier E46 330d's had less power than the newer ones.
Cheers all
soda said:
The E46 will be 204bhp, E90 is a bit more but not sure on exact figures.
That E46 is overpriced IMO, you could pick a decent example up for half that money.
I think the earlier E46's are 204bhp but the newer ones are 231bhp?That E46 is overpriced IMO, you could pick a decent example up for half that money.
I wouldn't actually consider that particular E46, it was just the first one I saw.
hornetrider said:
DannyVTS said:
Why not look at the 325D as an option? 60 in 7ish seconds and maybe a bit more economical/cheaper? One of them showed my Saxo up!
I could show your Saxo up on my pushbike Yep, I'm open to suggestions on which diesel engine to go for. I didn't want too much of a come-down in terms of power though, so would probably (dare I say it) get the diesel remapped.
Caulkhead said:
Mazdarese said:
I must admit I was surprised to see that you can get a decent spec E90 for around £9k, obviously with high mileage.
Why are you surprised? The owners want to off-load them before the turbo, the injectors, the DMF and the DPF need replacing. . . . . . This is what I'm concerned about! Saying that though, I think a lot of these cars are ex-lease so should have a decent maintenance history with them.
soda said:
Early E46 with 2926cc is 184bhp, 2993cc E46 is 204bhp. 231bhp must be the E90.
I'd go E46 personally, nice cabin to spend time in and very handy on the B roads in SE spec
E90 is a bit more refined, better choice for motorway work although I haven't driven the 330d variant to comment on that aspect.
If you are considering a remap avoid the 25d, no point spending money to get it to 330d performance when you can get the 330d and enjoy even more grunt
FWIW I cover around 20k in my E46, consistently mid 40's mpg although it drops to around 40 in very cold weather. I do like to make progress as well.
Cheers for that. I suppose I could get an E46 for around £5k with average miles? This looks nice.I'd go E46 personally, nice cabin to spend time in and very handy on the B roads in SE spec
E90 is a bit more refined, better choice for motorway work although I haven't driven the 330d variant to comment on that aspect.
If you are considering a remap avoid the 25d, no point spending money to get it to 330d performance when you can get the 330d and enjoy even more grunt
FWIW I cover around 20k in my E46, consistently mid 40's mpg although it drops to around 40 in very cold weather. I do like to make progress as well.
Caulkhead said:
Buy one, but stick £3k in a slush fund to fix it when it goes. Or keep your 6 and spend the £3k and cost to change on a Remus exhaust, a Sanspeed remap and many tankfulls of V-Power. . . . .
You're not helping! I was that close to ordering an induction kit and Hypertech module at the weekend. 300bhp in the click of a button. Vladimir said:
To the OP - 300bhp with a remap and induction kit? Possibly a wee bit optimistic!
The car is around 260bhp as standard, so 40bhp more isn't that optimistic really. I was also planning a cat replacement pipe which is supposed to help.Thanks for all the advice Gents. Depending on how my work situation changes in the next few weeks I'll be making a decision.
Vladimir said:
Mazdarese said:
The car is around 260bhp as standard, so 40bhp more isn't that optimistic really. I was also planning a cat replacement pipe which is supposed to help.
Thanks for all the advice Gents. Depending on how my work situation changes in the next few weeks I'll be making a decision.
No 330d is 260bhp as standard.Thanks for all the advice Gents. Depending on how my work situation changes in the next few weeks I'll be making a decision.
Current version is 241bhp although some may kick out more (mine kicks out 15bhp more than quoted for example). A 59bhp increase is a fair bit.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff