WIll you still buy a GT4 if it's a 2l turbo

WIll you still buy a GT4 if it's a 2l turbo

Poll: WIll you still buy a GT4 if it's a 2l turbo

Total Members Polled: 137

yes I am happy with a 4 pot turbo: 17%
No, I wanted a NA 3.4/3.6/3.8 lump in it: 68%
Undecided atm: 15%
Author
Discussion

thegreenhell

15,851 posts

221 months

Thursday 9th October 2014
quotequote all
They're probably the same people who think the new F1 turbo engines sound good compared to the old NA screamers.

mrdemon

Original Poster:

21,146 posts

267 months

Thursday 9th October 2014
quotequote all
ChrisW. said:
But does this make it lighter, more agile, more responsive --- more R --- ?

The new MX5 (shudder the mention on such hallowed ground) will weigh in at 1 tonne straight.

Times they are a changing -- at last.

Mass is the enemy.
I said that on the Spyder thread, but every one wants to add weight lol.

People it seems don't want light weight, and even you have PDK :-(

Sad days, I dislike all new cars atm most are quite dull.

Who wants a 4 pot turbo ? Not many people, I won't be buying it over my R.

Every one does want PDK, PCM, AC though, you would think half the people here should drive bentleys.

HokumPokum

2,052 posts

207 months

Friday 10th October 2014
quotequote all
i found the the 4G63 engine rather enduring......

whatever, i just want a fast cayman.

franki68

10,486 posts

223 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
itsybitsy said:
would be good if they reworked the 3.4 lump ala 991 gts engine giving perhaps circa 380hp or better still dropped the 991 gts lump in!now theres a thoughtbiggrin
that would be great,but probably too close to the gt3 performance wise for it to happen.

mrdemon

Original Poster:

21,146 posts

267 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
Gt3 is said to have ni on 500bhp

I think 100 less will be ok :-)

A 991 gts has 430 now days, so a Cayman can have 380 no issue imo.

RBT0

1,476 posts

121 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
http://www.gtspirit.com/2014/10/11/race-spec-porsc...

Well this demonstrates my source is reliable. I've been told also it won't be called GT4 but R. Sad for that.

itsybitsy

5,237 posts

187 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
so expect circa345 hp if a spyder is made and circa355hp for a gt4/r as both will be just an ecu job on current engine and costing £5k more than current gts!!!!!

TDT

4,977 posts

121 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
RBT0 said:
http://www.gtspirit.com/2014/10/11/race-spec-porsc...

Well this demonstrates my source is reliable. I've been told also it won't be called GT4 but R. Sad for that.
Surely - that article reinforces that if something does come to market it will be called GT4 - check the original article from Autosport which clearly positions the car under GT3 levels of performance as per the race series it would be based upon. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/116144

As for the power plant - i've said before that I think it will be n/a 3.4 or 3.6 and probably c375hp.
But if this will be a MY2016 and a race series homologation car then it could well be a turbo package - the sub booster/cayman car (718) has apparently been cancelled and this was poised to have the 4pot engine. If Volvo and Mercedes are developing 4pot engines with 355 & 400hp then Porsche has the capability also. As someone may have already said - maybe this will form another level of differentiation between the 911 platform and the Boxster/Caymans.

If its a hardcore race homologation special - I don't think I'll be in the market for buying/ownership - but will be interested to see it.

ChrisW.

6,376 posts

257 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
mrdemon said:
I said that on the Spyder thread, but every one wants to add weight lol.

People it seems don't want light weight, and even you have PDK :-(

Sad days, I dislike all new cars atm most are quite dull.

Who wants a 4 pot turbo ? Not many people, I won't be buying it over my R.

Every one does want PDK, PCM, AC though, you would think half the people here should drive bentleys.
You have such a way with words ... lol smile

Well noted, even I have a PDK, and I love it !

I have a 2002 GT3 RSR (ex ALMS) for when I must do the manual thing. Been there, got the T shirt.

See my post re the 915 v. G50 gearboxes ... smile

ChrisW.

6,376 posts

257 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
TDT said:
Surely - that article reinforces that if something does come to market it will be called GT4 - check the original article from Autosport which clearly positions the car under GT3 levels of performance as per the race series it would be based upon. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/116144

As for the power plant - i've said before that I think it will be n/a 3.4 or 3.6 and probably c375hp.
But if this will be a MY2016 and a race series homologation car then it could well be a turbo package - the sub booster/cayman car (718) has apparently been cancelled and this was poised to have the 4pot engine. If Volvo and Mercedes are developing 4pot engines with 355 & 400hp then Porsche has the capability also. As someone may have already said - maybe this will form another level of differentiation between the 911 platform and the Boxster/Caymans.

If its a hardcore race homologation special - I don't think I'll be in the market for buying/ownership - but will be interested to see it.
I think that Porsche have accepted that the 991 has become a large GT car ...

For those of us who love light, who might just play the Lotus card, who adore the 964RS and before it the 2.7RS ethos, I am sure the new GT4 will be the way ...

For Porsche it's a win / win, so why wouldn't they ?

Racing proves both the capacity to endure, whilst motivating and inspiring the spirit to discover what is possible ...

At what stage will any of us say that we have achieved this ?

To strive is to live ...


TB303

1,040 posts

196 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
ORD said:
+ 1 billion

1000kg and I would test drive it at least. Any heavier and you are getting a little bit less weight and a much worse engine.

I feel like I must be taking crazy pills when people can get excited about a powerful turbo 4 pot when the alternative is one of best sounding and most rewarding types of engine around.

Even worse than BMW dropping the V8 in the M3 in favour of a turbo 6 that may as well be a diesel eek
I agree the turbo 6 in the BMWs is a little boring (have not driven m3, but m135i has a great but fairly boring turbo 6 engine).

Lovely as they are, I don't think Porsche flat 6s are that exciting sounding though compared to a classic V8 in say a v8 vantage or Ferrari flat plane V8.

Porsche just make lovely efficient and balanced cars as an overall package, but sometimes this perfection is thought of as dullness.

DiscoColin

3,328 posts

216 months

Saturday 11th October 2014
quotequote all
TDT said:
RBT0 said:
http://www.gtspirit.com/2014/10/11/race-spec-porsc...

Well this demonstrates my source is reliable. I've been told also it won't be called GT4 but R. Sad for that.
Surely - that article reinforces that if something does come to market it will be called GT4 - check the original article from Autosport which clearly positions the car under GT3 levels of performance as per the race series it would be based upon. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/116144
The 991 GT3 has an engine that has nothing to do with the engine in the racing car, thus there is no reason to assume that a Cayman R road car would have anything to do with a GT4 racing car. There isn't a basis to assume shared nomenclature either - only the 991 GT3 Cup car has GT3 in it, with the racing variants launched since the launch of the GT3 road car being the 911 RSR and 911 GT America.

Personally I think it is 50:50 as to whether it will be a last hurrah for a flat 6 in a Boxster/Cayman chassis or it will be the first car to carry the turbo flat 4 that Porsche have already announced will be in the next generation. It would certainly make sense for it to be the turbo 4 in the racing car though as that would be a marketing boost for the credibility of the forthcoming line up of 4 cylinder road cars. But for the road car there really is nothing more than rumour and speculation at this point and it could easily be either. Personally I expecting the 991 GT3 to represent a precedent on the gearbox though - to my mind PDK only ought to be expected.

We shall see...

BubblesNW

1,710 posts

185 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
This month's copy of Car magazine has a feature on the most wanted cars for 2015 and claims the Cayman GT4 has a turbo 3.8 producing 450bhp. Georg Kacher is normally very close to Porsche but not this time.

As the current n/a 3.8 produced over 400bhp with the power kit option adding a turbo to get 450bhp seems totally inaccurate - one would expect 550 plus if you look at other turbocharges engines. Audi claim 434bhp for the new 2.5 litre RS3 and 454bhp for the 2.5 litre TTRS. I really can't see Porsche putting more power in a GT4 than the GT3.

It just goes to show that nobody really knows what to expect for the GT4 - only time will tell.

My wish list is normally aspirated, manual or PDK option and 370 - 400bhp would be just fine. Bucket and club sport as a no cost option would be nice. Hydraulic steering and sub 1200kg are unlikely but here's hoping ...

BubblesNW

1,710 posts

185 months

Sunday 12th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Tongue was firmly in cheek at this point ....

Carl_Docklands

12,390 posts

264 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
DiscoColin said:
TDT said:
RBT0 said:
http://www.gtspirit.com/2014/10/11/race-spec-porsc...

Well this demonstrates my source is reliable. I've been told also it won't be called GT4 but R. Sad for that.
Surely - that article reinforces that if something does come to market it will be called GT4 - check the original article from Autosport which clearly positions the car under GT3 levels of performance as per the race series it would be based upon. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/116144
The 991 GT3 has an engine that has nothing to do with the engine in the racing car, thus there is no reason to assume that a Cayman R road car would have anything to do with a GT4 racing car. There isn't a basis to assume shared nomenclature either - only the 991 GT3 Cup car has GT3 in it, with the racing variants launched since the launch of the GT3 road car being the 911 RSR and 911 GT America.

Personally I think it is 50:50 as to whether it will be a last hurrah for a flat 6 in a Boxster/Cayman chassis or it will be the first car to carry the turbo flat 4 that Porsche have already announced will be in the next generation. It would certainly make sense for it to be the turbo 4 in the racing car though as that would be a marketing boost for the credibility of the forthcoming line up of 4 cylinder road cars. But for the road car there really is nothing more than rumour and speculation at this point and it could easily be either. Personally I expecting the 991 GT3 to represent a precedent on the gearbox though - to my mind PDK only ought to be expected.

We shall see...
The part sharing between the 997 gt3 road car and the 997 rsr was fairly tenuous anyway. Good as a sales pitch reality was there were not as many parts shared as average buyer realised.

isaldiri

18,881 posts

170 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
Carl_Docklands said:
The part sharing between the 997 gt3 road car and the 997 rsr was fairly tenuous anyway. Good as a sales pitch reality was there were not as many parts shared as average buyer realised.
The engine isn't really what I would call 'fairly tenous'. If the link between the 7 GT3 road car and rsr is fairly tenous, what does that make the 991 gt3/rsr.....?

ChrisW.

6,376 posts

257 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
To be fair, I agree.

But if you don't say what you want, you are unlikely to get it.

This seems to be a fantastic opportunity to re-create the 964RS in 2015 ...

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

211 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I actually disagree. I think there is a market and its growing. But it wont be fed by Porsche, I agree on that.

Companys like Singer and PS have touched this market but are not at the right price point. There is the potential for someone to 'create' a car that would be very successful internationally. It might not even be air cooled.

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

211 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
I guess you are right cmoose.

I know lots of guys that physically dribble at the sight of a GT3 or 964RS etc but then go and buy a tip cab. They like the idea of the real 911 but are scared by the apparent compromises.

For me though, you have to go all the way, there is no compromise. I am not suggesting a 997 Cup as a daily but it has to be real. Dont ask me to define that though!

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

211 months

Monday 13th October 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
As if I would challenge such a reasonable statement? thumbup