Hello PHers and welcome to your new look forums!

[hyphen]

sgrimshaw said:

Do people really get paid for creating this st!

Truly an awful look.

+1

[Ste1987]

Wish they'd make up their minds which look they're going for. This one's worse than ever!

[ClockworkCupcake]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

They never were skins - it turned out that they were pretty much completely separate websites onto the same database, so the PH Team decided to ditch all of them and concentrate their efforts on buggering up improving just one rather than all of them. It was because of a need to switch to https.

[xjay1337]

Likes Fast Cars said:

xjay1337 said:

Jobbo said:

Hilarious - so many complaints about wanting the desktop site on mobile and instead they give us what looks like the mobile site on desktop

Yes . that's the issue.

The ONE thing people generally agreed on, on Desktop site was fine.
Now it looks naff.

I can get used to it.

but PLEASE CHANGE THE QUOTING BACK TO THE OLD WAY.
The bubbles are very ghey, unreadablle.

yes this, pleeeease!

Ironically where you have quoted me, the quote is broken No lines around it.

[8.4L 154]

WTF

I was nearly getting used to the last POS design.

I guess the Windows 95 designers manual was too complicated so they went to Windows 3.1 standards.

Next version will be Command line BBS

[andy43]

[xjay1337]

Quoting is FULLY broken
..... awful by PH Techs.

Appreciate you fixing some of the bugs, and to be honest the forum doesn't look awful, but it did look better on the old skin -
But fking test stuff!!!! It's so infuriating.

[ClockworkCupcake]

8.4L 154 said:

Next version will be Command line BBS

[DAVEVO9]

FFS leave things as they were

[dmsims]

Font weight 400

Can the CTO (well anyone) explain that ?

[loudlashadjuster]

The year is 2017.

Pistonheads reopens the great Usenet top-posting/bottom-posting debate. Many posters are lost to battle.

[8.4L 154]

ClockworkCupcake said:

8.4L 154 said:

Next version will be Command line BBS

I don't know whether to laugh or cry. :ROFLCRY:

[768]

Overriding the default font weight with the default font weight..?

[NoIP]

ClockworkCupcake said:

Probably doesn't mean anything to the youth of today as they'll have never seen layout before! Was that Ceefax or Oracle . Can never remember the difference. I do remember after stabbing in your page number with the remote you had to wait until the counter had gone all the way round before it would load the page you wanted. Most irksome.

[VGTICE]

Does anyone know what bulletin software they use on here? Or is it in house?

[mcdjl]

On the plus side it now looks (relatively) good on mobile.

[LordGrover]

VGTICE said:

Does anyone know what bulletin software they use on here? Or is it in house?

Out in the shed?

[sc0tt]

Looks alright to me.

[The Moose]

I really like it - think it's great!

I think the logo needs updating to match the style.

It's like when Apple made the major change to the look of iOS

[bigandclever]

How many made-up-percent of people liked this one then?