Tesla 3 Performance vs. I-Pace S
Discussion
WestyCarl said:
ZesPak said:
If speed doesn't matter at that point, why are we even discussing a TM3P instead of a regular LR, which starts a good 15k quid below an optionless I Pace?
Which is why I went for the LR, as much as the 18yr old in me wanted a car that went 0-60 in 3.xx seconds with my usage I just couldn't justify it.WestyCarl said:
ZesPak said:
If speed doesn't matter at that point, why are we even discussing a TM3P instead of a regular LR, which starts a good 15k quid below an optionless I Pace?
Which is why I went for the LR, as much as the 18yr old in me wanted a car that went 0-60 in 3.xx seconds with my usage I just couldn't justify it.I went for a MS 100D, the "P" would have added 12k EUR to the bill. As much as little boy in me wanted it, couldn't justify it.
ZesPak said:
Oh, I agree. But that defeats the point of the question asked imho. I think the Model S is a marvelous car to drive at 8/10, a pace at which most cars would struggle to keep up with it, but does that somehow make it as competent a car as the Model 3?
If speed doesn't matter at that point, why are we even discussing a TM3P instead of a regular LR, which starts a good 15k quid below an optionless I Pace?
Dunno, I nuked that Model S, huge derate and fans at full chat. My Honda Insight would have kept up I reckon If speed doesn't matter at that point, why are we even discussing a TM3P instead of a regular LR, which starts a good 15k quid below an optionless I Pace?
Gassing Station | EV and Alternative Fuels | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff