V6 Essex with 290º Cam - Hydrocarbon problems

V6 Essex with 290º Cam - Hydrocarbon problems

Author
Discussion

3000MV6

Original Poster:

7 posts

225 months

Sunday 4th September 2005
quotequote all
Has anyone experienced trouble with non standard camshafts and MOT emission rules recently?

The limit for post 1975 cars/pre early 80's is 1200ppm - I am having trouble getting it below about 1400ppm at 2500 rpm (allowable rather than idle speed if idle HC's are too high - mine are 3000 at idle!). Using a V62 290º Kent Road/Rally cam, I'm guessing the 74º valve overlap is causing this trouble. Short of widening the rocker arm to pushrod gap for the MOT, I reckon a milder cam is needed - V63 looking the best.
Just to add that CO is 2.3%, O2 is about 5-7% on machine & I've tried all sorts to try to get the reading down (luckily I have access to a good emissions testing machine). I'm running triple 40DCNF Weber carbs too.

Of course there may be another reason/reasons for the problem such as incorrect jetting/ignition etc and am currently checking everything again, including cam timing (was altered by my rolling road) but I need to find out first what it's been set to, if this is wrong then that's the first thing to change.

Any advice would be very welcome.

3000MV6

Original Poster:

7 posts

225 months

Monday 5th September 2005
quotequote all
Thanks all of you!

Will post my findings once I get time to sort it, however it's a little worrying for the future of classic cars. The MOT test includes a set procedure for emissions now and this can't be bypassed unless the probe is plugged into another car, or if the tester is "kind". The engine is still not 100% so I know there are 1 or 2 things that need changing, possibly mid-range jetting is too rich, and also cam timing as already mentioned.

I'd rather sort it out properly as the fumes are a problem on the M Series cars for making your clothes smell. Engine mapping sounds like a good (but expensive) idea, shame I can't adapt a VVT pulley to work on the Essex engine - that would sort it out...

3000MV6

Original Poster:

7 posts

225 months

Monday 5th September 2005
quotequote all
Well I've got the standard single carb/manifold setup which would be an easy swap I guess

3000MV6

Original Poster:

7 posts

225 months

Tuesday 6th September 2005
quotequote all
Just for info. I had a reply from Piper today says basically alter cam timing temporarily to reduce lift at TDC, then swap it back again afterwards.

I like the carb idea better, and guess also that as air/fuel flow is distributed differently on a triple carb setup, a single carb will not have the same pulsing effect.

I can see some fun hours of testing ahead

3000MV6

Original Poster:

7 posts

225 months

Wednesday 7th September 2005
quotequote all
Interesting reading here:

http://chevyhiperformance.com/howto/71498/

Basically confirms overlap problems, but also some interesting ways to help idle mixture troubles.

3000MV6

Original Poster:

7 posts

225 months

Thursday 8th September 2005
quotequote all
Valve stems are new, as are guides

I'm still thinking maybe leaning off the jets & playing with the timing for the test. However turning down the CO doesn't drop the HC at idle 650rpm so I am thinking the 2500rpm test is the way to go, however I need the mixture leaned off at this point as that is what's causing the trouble - as I managed to get it down to about 1400 at 2500rpm then a leaner mixture at this point would work. Just need to figure out what I need - whether its air corrector, emulsion tube, idle or main jets. More studying in progress