Pirelli tyres

Poll: Pirelli tyres

Total Members Polled: 337

F1 tyres shoud be fast and durable: 55%
non-durable tyres inproe the show: 45%
Author
Discussion

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

180 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
Formula 1 is show business, it is there to entertain, it used to be the technical pinicle of all things automotive, but your average family hatchback is more sophisticated these days, the best way of doing that and giving it as long a life as possible is to do it using as little cash as possible, so the current tyres seem the perfect way of doing that to me.
Excellent comment. But there's no harm in questioning the tyre situation and see if it can be improved upon with the aim to make racing as entertaining as reasonably possible.



Edited by Johnboy Mac on Tuesday 24th April 11:26

zac510

5,546 posts

208 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Yes well said Megaflow.

On another matter, the thing (that many people in here have) about having a particular expectation about how F1 should be, what kind of driver and team should win is that if that occurs then it's exactly what you're expecting, what you wanted. That means it's predictable, like knowing the result of the race beforehand.

Leithen

11,203 posts

269 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Martin Brundle confirms that MSC is not alone amongst drivers, in his view of the the tyre limitations.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
Formula 1 is show business, it is there to entertain, it used to be the technical pinicle of all things automotive, but your average family hatchback is more sophisticated these days, the best way of doing that and giving it as long a life as possible is to do it using as little cash as possible, so the current tyres seem the perfect way of doing that to me.
May not have the driver aids of other series(which I feel is a good thing) but still at the forefront of technology, which area is a hatchback more sophisticated?
Also still the fastest cars around a circuit by some margin.
I don't feel they are driving around the tyres any more than last year really, Schuey is clearly more frustrated than most.

davepoth

29,395 posts

201 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
Megaflow said:
Formula 1 is show business, it is there to entertain, it used to be the technical pinicle of all things automotive, but your average family hatchback is more sophisticated these days, the best way of doing that and giving it as long a life as possible is to do it using as little cash as possible, so the current tyres seem the perfect way of doing that to me.
May not have the driver aids of other series(which I feel is a good thing) but still at the forefront of technology, which area is a hatchback more sophisticated?
Also still the fastest cars around a circuit by some margin.
I don't feel they are driving around the tyres any more than last year really, Schuey is clearly more frustrated than most.
Hatchback has:

Compound charging
Traction control
Stability control
Torque vectoring differential
Full hybrid systems (KERS is very limited)
automatically adaptable aerodynamics
automated parking (think about this in reference to pitting)
Magnetically adjustable suspension
Hubcaps
Remote ECU flashing
Rear view cameras
Ground effect underbody

Off the top of my head. All of which have been banned.


Use Psychology

11,327 posts

194 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
central locking too smile

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
stephen300o said:
Megaflow said:
Formula 1 is show business, it is there to entertain, it used to be the technical pinicle of all things automotive, but your average family hatchback is more sophisticated these days, the best way of doing that and giving it as long a life as possible is to do it using as little cash as possible, so the current tyres seem the perfect way of doing that to me.
May not have the driver aids of other series(which I feel is a good thing) but still at the forefront of technology, which area is a hatchback more sophisticated?
Also still the fastest cars around a circuit by some margin.
I don't feel they are driving around the tyres any more than last year really, Schuey is clearly more frustrated than most.
Hatchback has:

Compound charging
Traction control
Stability control
Torque vectoring differential
Full hybrid systems (KERS is very limited)
automatically adaptable aerodynamics
automated parking (think about this in reference to pitting)
Magnetically adjustable suspension
Hubcaps
Remote ECU flashing
Rear view cameras
Ground effect underbody

Off the top of my head. All of which have been banned.
Average hatchback has automatically adaptable aero?..

Ground effect underbody is the only other one you would want from that list, but I think an F1 produces more downforce from it's undertray than a hatchback does..

Although hubcaps would be awesome! cloud9


Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

180 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
Average hatchback has automatically adaptable aero?..
Ford Focus.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Johnboy Mac said:
stephen300o said:
Average hatchback has automatically adaptable aero?..
Ford Focus.
After a quick google 'automatically adaptable aero' is overstating what that does a bit. lol

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

180 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
After a quick google 'automatically adaptable aero' is overstating what that does a bit. lol
Well, it either is or it isn't.

pingu393

8,081 posts

207 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
The problem with F1 is the rear wing. If it was banned and rear turbulence was minimised racing would be closer. All the adaptions (KERS, DRS, tyres) are to compensate for the rear turbulence of the leading car and allow a more exciting spectacle.

Aero grip is negligible in normal cars, so advancements do not help Joe Public. Advances in mechanical grip would.

Until aero is reduced, keep the c**p tyres.

Megaflow

9,522 posts

227 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
stephen300o said:
Megaflow said:
Formula 1 is show business, it is there to entertain, it used to be the technical pinicle of all things automotive, but your average family hatchback is more sophisticated these days, the best way of doing that and giving it as long a life as possible is to do it using as little cash as possible, so the current tyres seem the perfect way of doing that to me.
May not have the driver aids of other series(which I feel is a good thing) but still at the forefront of technology, which area is a hatchback more sophisticated?
Also still the fastest cars around a circuit by some margin.
I don't feel they are driving around the tyres any more than last year really, Schuey is clearly more frustrated than most.
Hatchback has:

Compound charging
Traction control
Stability control
Torque vectoring differential
Full hybrid systems (KERS is very limited)
automatically adaptable aerodynamics
automated parking (think about this in reference to pitting)
Magnetically adjustable suspension
Hubcaps
Remote ECU flashing
Rear view cameras
Ground effect underbody

Off the top of my head. All of which have been banned.
Thanks, saved me a job...

thumbup

stephen300o said:
Johnboy Mac said:
stephen300o said:
Average hatchback has automatically adaptable aero?..
Ford Focus.
After a quick google 'automatically adaptable aero' is overstating what that does a bit. lol
How, the car automatically adjusts the aerodynamics of the car to reduce drag depending on the cooling it requires. The principle is exactly the same as automatically redcuing drag depending on downforce required for cornering.

About the only way a Formula 1 car is more complex than a normal car is in the material the components are made from and the lengths they go to reduce weight.

Edited by Megaflow on Tuesday 24th April 12:30

oyster

12,686 posts

250 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
playalistic said:
Bet he wouldn't be whinging if he was at the front of the grid consistently.
In the first 3 races he qualified 4th, 3rd and 3rd (promoted to 2nd). Hardly failing to be near the front.

I agree with Schumy on this one.

Is the racing exciting? Well yes, in the same way that lotteries are also exciting.

Did Kimi really deserve to drop from 2nd to 14th in a few laps in China just because his tyres had gone off? Maybe if he's dropped those places over 12-15 laps it might have been ok, but over half a dozen laps it was ridiculous. That's not racing. What other race series has such inconsistency in the tyres?

stephen300o

15,464 posts

230 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Johnboy Mac said:
stephen300o said:
After a quick google 'automatically adaptable aero' is overstating what that does a bit. lol
Well, it either is or it isn't.
It's more like a simple marketing gimmick really.

Anyway I think the tyres are fine as they are, probably be better still when they are inside the expected temperatures instead of like the last two cooler races.

Wonderboy46

36 posts

146 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
I partly agree with what Schumi was trying to say. He certainly seems to long for the days of being able to push through the entire race without worrying about tyres, or even fuel. And I can see his point on that level.

But as many others have said in this thread, the current tyres are making F1 much more entertaining and that's the way that things will have to be for the foreseeable future, unless something serious is done within the aero rules to correct the "dirty air" problem.

RB Will

9,685 posts

242 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Not read the whole thread but I think from a drivers point of view the tyre situation must be quite frustrating but for the fans it works quite well as it spices things up.

wicz

119 posts

174 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
I think China was one of the most exciting races ive ever seen. I understand the argument that the drivers are not able to go flat out all the time and I would not want this forever, but with the rules always changing this is just a phase and im quite happy with it.

What its done is redefine what makes a great racing driver. Looking after the tyres is just anouther element of racing that has become more important. Being able to adapt to the performance of the car underneath you and perform constantly is a skill that all good racers need.

zac510

5,546 posts

208 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
As I said earlier in the thread I am sure we'll see someone doing a one-stop before the end of the season. After this 3 day Mugello test and a couple more races the top teams will have the tyres in the zone all the time.

epom

11,752 posts

163 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
Most likely he is thinking out loud, and of course it would suit him, he's hardly going to say something that didnt. As everyone knows he was/is the man for making his way through the field. I agree with him though, as it is F1 racing and not F1 tyre preservation !!

hairykrishna

13,233 posts

205 months

Tuesday 24th April 2012
quotequote all
He's well known for wanting to squeeze every last drop of performance from his car hence the brake balance adjusting in between the corners and amounts of testing that bordered on obsessive. I would imagine that, given that mindset, it must be massively frustrating for him to bimble around at 7/10ths for a lot of the race to stop his tyres disintegrating.