Bargepole time???
Discussion
Hi there,
You guys really know your stuff! I thought the RUF 944 seemed dubious myself...
I am looking a low mileage (under 95k) 944 Turbo. What should I be paying for this? Does anyone have anything outstanding on sale?
Also, what do you guys think about 'chippinh' the engine?
I am here to learn!
You guys really know your stuff! I thought the RUF 944 seemed dubious myself...
I am looking a low mileage (under 95k) 944 Turbo. What should I be paying for this? Does anyone have anything outstanding on sale?
Also, what do you guys think about 'chippinh' the engine?
I am here to learn!
Hi.
We've got a 944 classifieds section here if you wish to take a look:
www.pistonheads.com/sales/list.asp?p=1&s=81
DAZ
We've got a 944 classifieds section here if you wish to take a look:
www.pistonheads.com/sales/list.asp?p=1&s=81
DAZ
speed.deman said:
If one was to chip an S2, would it be as quick as a Turbo?
No.
I've owned both and the Turbo always felt miles faster - mainly because it had bags more torque. I had 152 out of the Turbo and 140 out of the S2. Iguana reckons you can wind the S2s up more, and there's maybe 10bhp extra in a chip, but I don't buy it. The Turbos really feel - and are - faster bits of kits (although the S2 would probably be quicker in the wet on a twisty road... the Turbo can be a bit lively).
Just my opinion. I'm sure there are a few S2 owners who've 'smoked' a Turbo in their time
I want a car that has bags of grin factor, its going to be used for weekends and long trips. I have a 650 Suzuki for commuting!
So grin for grin, sounds like its the Turbo for me!
I found a site that does nice bodykits, not cheap looking at all. jacuemond.com (strosek copies, I think)
Any takes on fitting wider arches to a 944? Perhaps its just a matter of taste...
So grin for grin, sounds like its the Turbo for me!
I found a site that does nice bodykits, not cheap looking at all. jacuemond.com (strosek copies, I think)
Any takes on fitting wider arches to a 944? Perhaps its just a matter of taste...
speed.deman said:
Any takes on fitting wider arches to a 944? Perhaps its just a matter of taste...
Makes a great looking car into looking like a chav'd up piece of sh*te- well you did ask!
Ref S2 vs Turbo, I dont often say this but :shock horror: I do mainly agree with Dom on this, a chipped 250 turbo- which usually equals 300'ish'bhp all being well with wastegate etc, is a very differnt proposition to an S2, the midrange torque is properly agressive & genuinly 'feck me thats nippy' feel.
S2s are great & terific all rounders & no lag etc etc & has preferable characteristics for many drivers, but a chipped turbo is indeed a significant performance step on- my current 944T is just chipped which equaled 280bhp & then properly set up = 311bhp, so 100 more than an S2 & the same weight, so yes rather obviously a tad brisker but with LSD & huge wedge of torque is not as easy to drive flat out down on a typical b road as an S2, open road or track tho= way way quicker.
clubsport said:
What sort of torque figures lb/ft do these standard & modded 944T achieve....just trying to get a perspective on huge wedge.
www.944turbo.org.uk/chips.htm
and
www.cannell.co.uk/Dyno%20Day%20190604.htm
cuneus said:
clubsport said:
What sort of torque figures lb/ft do these standard & modded 944T achieve....just trying to get a perspective on huge wedge.
www.944turbo.org.uk/chips.htm
and
www.cannell.co.uk/Dyno%20Day%20190604.htm
Thanks for the links, interesting despite the torque fig in the first link looking like absolute B---ocks.
Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff