I've just bought some poverty Pork…

I've just bought some poverty Pork…

Author
Discussion

Smollet

10,805 posts

192 months

Wednesday 13th July 2022
quotequote all
A - W said:
MrC986 said:
Smollet said:
Online MOT history indicates the car may need tyres & suspension work imminently. I helped a good friend buy a similar age car last year (with 80k miles on the clock) & he paid about £6.5k for his so the pricing looks ok. On a car of that age, tyre age & perished suspension components & air con rads etc. become more prevalent.
Retracted roof looks filthy, then some other photos from seemingly maybe another time/advert? Not sure.
Yes, the lack of pictures with the hood erected or interior makes me wonder as to what it’s like in the flesh. I think the price isn’t too far off bearing in mind other ones of similar spec, age, mileage but in good nick are easily £10k+

Bluedot

3,608 posts

109 months

Wednesday 13th July 2022
quotequote all
Anyone fancy swallowing a brave pill laugh

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202207127...

Smollet

10,805 posts

192 months

Wednesday 13th July 2022
quotequote all
Bluedot said:
Anyone fancy swallowing a brave pill laugh

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202207127...
Probably worth that in scrap value.

2Btoo

3,455 posts

205 months

Wednesday 13th July 2022
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
2Btoo said:
Hmmm. I've had my 987.1 2.7 Cayman for a few years now and I'd never have agreed with the sentiments that it doesn't have enough grunt.

Today, for the first time (possibly ever), I drove the car and thought precisely that.

How odd. I wonder if it's to do with the hot weather.
It was 31 degrees on Monday, a 987/986 engine bay is a hot place and compromised from the perspective of cooling/air flow at the best of times. I’d be surprised if the ECU wasn’t trying to compensate for the increased inlet temperatures it was seeing, and you experienced a noticeable power loss as a result.

Winter is just round the corner now hehe and normal service will be resumed once we get back to sub 10 degree temperatures (and some rain to improve inlet charge density) smile

Alternatively you could pop out at 3 or 4am when the temperature has dropped, and report back as to whether the engine feels more “normal” as a result of the 15 + degree temperature drop in the engine bay.
Thanks slippy. I reckon that's the explanation; hot air is less dense than cold and hence you can't make as much fuel burn in a given volume of it. Less air, less fuel, less power .... I'm not about to get up at the buttcrack of dawn to see what difference there is but I've experienced it on other cars and am not that worried.

(I've always subscribed to the view that the car is more capable than am I, which applies to both my 944 and 987. There is no point in pursuing more power when I can't make proper use of the power that I have and I am more into finesse of handling than outright grunt, so the 2.7 is perfectly fine for me. However this was the first time when I drove the car and felt that I was reaching the limit's of it's abilities. Hopefully that will pass along with the hot spell, and I'll be back to being reduced to 'average' by a capable car.)

Smollet

10,805 posts

192 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
https://www.portiacraft.com/car-detail.php?id=3222
Looks very legit but the interior could be a bit much

julian987R

6,840 posts

61 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
Smollet said:
https://www.portiacraft.com/car-detail.php?id=3222
Looks very legit but the interior could be a bit much
a bit?

2Btoo

3,455 posts

205 months

Thursday 14th July 2022
quotequote all
Fourteen bags for a 986 is going some. It'll need to be very nice for that.

And I quite like the interior. Very like the full red extended leather interior in my 987, which I love!

snotrag

14,563 posts

213 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
A good 4 or 5 years and 2 sportscars since I had a 986 but the fact I still hang around here speaks volumes.

Looking at a few options but an obvious one might be a 987. Early 3.2, or a really nice 2.7. Somewhere in the 10-15k bracket probably. (It is frankly daft when you think about it, I could go from the absolute bottom Entry point Elise into a ~250hp flat 6 convertible)

- Has anyone here had 986 and 987?

- Is it only 'sport edition' 987.1 2.7s that have the 6 speed box? i haven seen a single other that has had the 6 speed option purportedly available.

- The 987 has less pronounced stagger, but more overall rubber on the road than the 986. Is there too much grip? Do the limits feel higher than the 986? I dont want something that is too locked down.

- Gear ratios - how do they compare? 986 2.7 was the worst of the lot and one of my main bugbears, I am assuming the 987 5 speed ratios are as long or longer than that at least. Does the 6 speed close it up a little?

Fundamentally - My Elise is at one extreme. I love it, its brilliant, it makes you feel amazing - but its difficult to use it on longer trips. I went to GFOS last month, which is a 500 mile round trip down the motorway - so I didnt take the Lotus. I would really have liked to have gone in my 'fun' car not a diesel estate. A Boxster would have been ideal.

And I really really miss having a 'special' engine. I would just regret the change if it ends up feeling too safe, too dull at road speeds, too refined etc... I worry another, even more modern Porsche, might be too much of a swing to the other extreme.




Edited by snotrag on Friday 15th July 14:09

snotrag

14,563 posts

213 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Yes, this is stretching 'poverty' but EVERYTHING is multiples more expensive than when this thread started.

But look at it. A perfect example of why spec matters so much on cars like this. Its bright yellow. Its a Porsche. Its got yellow seat belts. Its got 'it' whatever 'it' may be. Lovely.



https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/225063162942?mkcid=16&a...

julian987R

6,840 posts

61 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
snotrag said:
Yes, this is stretching 'poverty' but EVERYTHING is multiples more expensive than when this thread started.

But look at it. A perfect example of why spec matters so much on cars like this. Its bright yellow. Its a Porsche. Its got yellow seat belts. Its got 'it' whatever 'it' may be. Lovely.



https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/225063162942?mkcid=16&a...

RM

597 posts

99 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
snotrag said:
Yes, this is stretching 'poverty' but EVERYTHING is multiples more expensive than when this thread started.

But look at it. A perfect example of why spec matters so much on cars like this. Its bright yellow. Its a Porsche. Its got yellow seat belts. Its got 'it' whatever 'it' may be. Lovely.


https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/225063162942?mkcid=16&a...
Why on earth would someone spec it with £9k of extras but not add extended leather? There are acres of textured plastic on that dash and doors.

esotericar

745 posts

29 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
snotrag said:
- Has anyone here had 986 and 987?

- Is it only 'sport edition' 987.1 2.7s that have the 6 speed box? i haven seen a single other that has had the 6 speed option purportedly available.

- The 987 has less pronounced stagger, but more overall rubber on the road than the 986. Is there too much grip? Do the limits feel higher than the 986? I dont want something that is too locked down.

- Gear ratios - how do they compare? 986 2.7 was the worst of the lot and one of my main bugbears, I am assuming the 987 5 speed ratios are as long or longer than that at least. Does the 6 speed close it up a little?
Six speed box was optional on any 987.1 2.7. Not many ticked the box.

Limits are higher, but you can fit the 17s with 205 fronts and 235 rears to any 987, including 3.2 / 3.4 models, if you want the car to feel more alive and interactive. The 986 feels distinctly more mechanical and old school than the 987, which skinny tyres won't help with. Really depends on what you prefer. But you can't have it all. There are aspects of the drive that are nicer with the 986, others that favour the 987.

Six speed doesn't really give you a low / close ratio feel. It's pretty long legged. They all are.

esotericar

745 posts

29 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
RM said:
Why on earth would someone spec it with £9k of extras but not add extended leather? There are acres of textured plastic on that dash and doors.
Relatively few specced it. If you look at, say, the 997.2 GTS, which rather weirdly didn't get ext leather in the UK while cooking Carreras and Carrera S models in the UK did (I think ostensibly because it was a pretend Porsche GTx car), quite a few don't have. the extended leather, so you now have megabucks GTS's listed for sale with plastic interiors.

Try finding a decent 987.2 Cayman with the cow. Only about one or two in 10 have it.

Generally, whoever was buying these cars in the UK did a stastic job speccing them. Most are really badly specced. Quite often when you find a really nicely specced car you'd find it was an ex demo.

minimoog

6,907 posts

221 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
esotericar said:
Generally, whoever was buying these cars in the UK did a stastic job speccing them. Most are really badly specced. Quite often when you find a really nicely specced car you'd find it was an ex demo.
Mine's decently specced - full leather, seats, xenons, climate, 18s, sports wheel, cruise. Not much I'd add to that.

Smollet

10,805 posts

192 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
julian987R said:
It seems after late 2005 the tax jumped significantly that’s why I’m looking at cars at a lower level.

julian987R

6,840 posts

61 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Smollet said:
julian987R said:
It seems after late 2005 the tax jumped significantly that’s why I’m looking at cars at a lower level.
that is not the universal rule. Just that the Boxster Sport and Cayman Sport emissions wise meant those 2 were significantly more. For example my CR is after 2005, but half that tax.

jimmy p

960 posts

168 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
Smollet said:
julian987R said:
It seems after late 2005 the tax jumped significantly that’s why I’m looking at cars at a lower level.
23rd March 2006 was the tax change date, so you can just find an early 06 plate just in the lower tax bracket

kingston12

5,513 posts

159 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
I think that the 3.2S up to Mardh 2006 pay the lower rate of £360 and the later models pay £615/£630.

Smollet

10,805 posts

192 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
kingston12 said:
I think that the 3.2S up to Mardh 2006 pay the lower rate of £360 and the later models pay £615/£630.
My 3.4 996 was a late February 2001 car and £290 pa. Any car same spec after that was £360 iirc

snotrag

14,563 posts

213 months

Friday 15th July 2022
quotequote all
I've always found it interesting that people put such a value on the tax bracket.

Does £300 either way really make that much difference in the annual running costs of the vehicle? It's way, way, way down the list of costs I tend to worry about. Just one single unplanned failure, or something like a puncture, would make a bigger different than that?


I've bought a number of great cars in the high tax bracket, and I'm sure I've ended up actually spending less over their whole life with me than I would having paid a premium for a lower tax model! (Vectra VXR prime example, 05/55/06 models used to sell for more than 56s!)


I'm not in anyway suggesting some sort of throwaway attitude to money or budgeting - just that tax is a really easy calculated and planned cost, and there's so many other much more important things to bother or worry about when buying an old Porsche that could blow the budget!