RE: Audi Planning More Powerful RS6?

RE: Audi Planning More Powerful RS6?

Author
Discussion

Jim Green

449 posts

211 months

Friday 16th May 2008
quotequote all
I drive an M5 with 400bhp, and it's quick..........So the Audi must be fantastic. I just love it that BMW M Power and Audi are producing the cars that us in the minority (Not Particulary Environmentally Friendly....as far as our cars go) will be able to buy when they come on the second hand marke when they're about five years old.

Zad

12,714 posts

238 months

Friday 16th May 2008
quotequote all
But... The RS6 V10BT reputedly has 610bhp anyway! A report (which was published on here too) claimed that Austrian auto approvals engineers had to perform various tests, including the chassis dyno. The resultant information was that it kicks out 610bhp, and that the probability is that Audi engineers were too embarrassed to claim the full amount. It would also make it more difficult to produce/sell future versions.

"JR"

514 posts

217 months

Friday 16th May 2008
quotequote all
ive only been in one for about a 10 min blast, but the new RS6 is quite amazing, weight doesnt seem noticable either, but then south london is unlikly to test the handling out

VeryRisky

80 posts

207 months

Friday 16th May 2008
quotequote all
Tsiakosmantis said:
What a pointless exercise!

I really think that for a large saloon/estate the cut-off point should be around 450 BHP.

How about this for a radical idea?

A stripped out CSL Style RS4
Saloon version only, V8 in 420BHP format, weight 1500KG.
Priced @ around £55K
Every time I read a RS6 thread this comment shows up.

It's an RS6, dammit and that means it is a whacking great estate car with enough horses to scare you dogs to death. Some of us prefer decent sized cars and thus comparing it to a track turned version of a mid-sized saloon, is about as relevant as comparing it to a space-hopper.

planetdave

9,921 posts

255 months

Friday 16th May 2008
quotequote all
If you're aiming for 'over the top' aim high yes

bogie

16,432 posts

274 months

Friday 16th May 2008
quotequote all
it will be the like the old RS6 - a lot of owners will be running 10% more power min, just buy remapping them aftermarket so the "plus" version is just to allow Audi to charge like £10K more for a few bits of trim to sell the last 50 carswink

my old RS6 ran 505bhp from a week after I got it...certainly an awesome everyday car...just a shame about the running costs !..but I would have another tomorrow if i was limited to one practical car etc

carsnapper

334 posts

243 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
If we extrapolate current rate of engine power output increase in the German Uber saloon / estate market, we shall see that by 2011, an entry level car will have an average of 7,211,21 BHP, thus making the 610 HP Audi look pathetic in comparison...thus making James the laughing stock of Foxhill's Golf Club, Surrey.

FGS, ease off on the HP! Lets see some weight reduction and better driver feel from the Quattro. Or how about a selectable diff in an Audi, Quaife LSD please with 4WD and RWD selections...oh yes. smile

rsv gone!

11,288 posts

243 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
carsnapper said:
FGS, ease off on the HP! Lets see some weight reduction and better driver feel from the Quattro. Or how about a selectable diff in an Audi, Quaife LSD please with 4WD and RWD selections...oh yes. smile
Sounds like fun.

But not the RS6's place in the car world. Just an uber 4WD car, with loads of room, goodies and comfort. To give massive performance in a benign, controllable way.

Any car is a compromise - it can't be all things to all men.

carsnapper

334 posts

243 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
rsv gone! said:
carsnapper said:
FGS, ease off on the HP! Lets see some weight reduction and better driver feel from the Quattro. Or how about a selectable diff in an Audi, Quaife LSD please with 4WD and RWD selections...oh yes. smile
Sounds like fun.

But not the RS6's place in the car world. Just an uber 4WD car, with loads of room, goodies and comfort. To give massive performance in a benign, controllable way.

Any car is a compromise - it can't be all things to all men.
I know, I know...laugh your right. And a car can never be all things to all women. No one builds a full length vanity mirror in to a sun visor yet. ****take cover...incoming!*****eek who said that?

Stealth-wagon

1,038 posts

204 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
VeryRisky said:
It's an RS6, dammit and that means it is a whacking great estate car with enough horses to scare you dogs to death. Some of us prefer decent sized cars and thus comparing it to a track turned version of a mid-sized saloon, is about as relevant as comparing it to a space-hopper.
Oi, leave the space hoppers alone.. they need all the help they can get.


Instead of producing a car theoretically capable of 190mph, I'd much prefer it if they simply reduced the final drive gear ratios (or equivalent) so that it does a more modest 120mph max. This single change could be used to improve acceleration in the useable speed bands - which is half the reason for buying something as daft as an RS6 in the first place.

Also, at 2 whole tons its one hell of a lard-arse but its still ‘only’ got 300bhp / ton, so another thing they could try and do is put the damn thing on a diet and get it down to something more reasonable like 1,600kg. This would produce a 20% performance gain (loosely speaking).

And I supposed if they did both the above they could also produce a car with less power, and better economy and yet possibly make it even more accelerative - in theory !

It wasnt that long ago that most cars were in the 1,000-1,200kg bracket. I wonder how much of a modern cars weight comes down to nanny-state safety requirements like 10 airbags, multiple crumple zones, quad side impact bars, integrated roll over bars in the roof sections etc etc, and whilst this is a nice plus point about car technology evolution, we are all being speed-fined into doing 20mph everywhere, so how much of it is really necessary ?!

rayb74

41 posts

209 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
morgrp said:
rayb74 said:
570 > 610 bhp increase........................ WOW that is going to be really noticeable.

How about just reducing the weight?

Oh I forgot bragging rights at the golf club.
Only on this website could someone see a 610bhp super estate car as lardy or get into the geekish subject of "losing weight" - get a life - Its a 610bhp estate car!!! who cares about the friggin weight of the thing! - I think its insane and I think its superb - you need that BHP in your life - M5, RS6, E63 - they're all great

Edited by morgrp on Friday 16th May 15:05


Edited by morgrp on Friday 16th May 15:05


Edited by morgrp on Friday 16th May 15:23
Your one of the Tools who sees the logic behind this as good I do not. Hey I`m gonna buy an estate with 1000bhp that weighs 4 tons !


Edweirdo

19 posts

196 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
It's a beast no question but weighs the same roughly as a sherman tank. The figure's from the old car and the "plus" for 0-60's etc were very similair. They were awesome!. Agreed with some other comments on here that this is the engine that should have been in the R8 with the turbo's still firmly attatched!. Real RS's have turbo's!!!

Essex Exile

390 posts

195 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
Stick that engine in a Skoda Superb. That'll show 'em!

flattotheboards

6,683 posts

208 months

Saturday 17th May 2008
quotequote all
Plus + remap = biggrin

negative creep

25,016 posts

229 months

Sunday 18th May 2008
quotequote all
Can't we have a stripped out rear drive version?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

272 months

Sunday 18th May 2008
quotequote all
rayb74 said:
morgrp said:
rayb74 said:
570 > 610 bhp increase........................ WOW that is going to be really noticeable.

How about just reducing the weight?

Oh I forgot bragging rights at the golf club.
Only on this website could someone see a 610bhp super estate car as lardy or get into the geekish subject of "losing weight" - get a life - Its a 610bhp estate car!!! who cares about the friggin weight of the thing! - I think its insane and I think its superb - you need that BHP in your life - M5, RS6, E63 - they're all great

Edited by morgrp on Friday 16th May 15:05


Edited by morgrp on Friday 16th May 15:05


Edited by morgrp on Friday 16th May 15:23
Your one of the Tools who sees the logic behind this as good I do not. Hey I`m gonna buy an estate with 1000bhp that weighs 4 tons !
If the market dictates that there is a need for a 1000bhp 4 tonne saloon then I'mm sure someone will build one.

Thats the great thing about choice.

Zod

35,295 posts

260 months

Sunday 18th May 2008
quotequote all
Why would people want a stripped-out four door saloon. confused

What Audi and BMW need to do is just make their cars lighter for the next generation (Audi especially). I'd pay £10k more for lighter weight materials with delight.

carsnapper

334 posts

243 months

Monday 19th May 2008
quotequote all
Zod said:
Why would people want a stripped-out four door saloon. confused

What Audi and BMW need to do is just make their cars lighter for the next generation (Audi especially). I'd pay £10k more for lighter weight materials with delight.
you've got more money than sense! Just go buy an Ariel Atom for the weekend, and whatever you want for the grind...

Double R

872 posts

232 months

Monday 19th May 2008
quotequote all
we should be all thankful that cars like this one are still made IMHO. We are all going to drive electric cars in 10 years so this is the swan song of the end of an era like the Bugatti Veyron

Have fun guys... if can afford it, flaunt it! I say smile

you only live once... so the dog smile

Zod

35,295 posts

260 months

Monday 19th May 2008
quotequote all
carsnapper said:
Zod said:
Why would people want a stripped-out four door saloon. confused

What Audi and BMW need to do is just make their cars lighter for the next generation (Audi especially). I'd pay £10k more for lighter weight materials with delight.
you've got more money than sense! Just go buy an Ariel Atom for the weekend, and whatever you want for the grind...
No. While I toy with buying a Caterham, I still "need" the M5 because when I'm driving across Europe, I want to enjoy it in a way I would not in a less extreme saloon.

As to whether I have more money than sense, perhaps it wouldn't take much money for that to be the case!