Who is best for cylinderhead development work uk

Who is best for cylinderhead development work uk

Author
Discussion

Mignon

1,018 posts

90 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
227bhp said:
A flow loss = power loss, but not necessarily vice versa
That is both a logical and mathematical impossibility. If a flow loss always equals a power loss then a flow gain must always equal a power gain for the former to be true.

In actuality head flow and power potential are very closely correlated UNLESS some other limiting factor, often the induction system flow capability, is capping the gains. For this reason low and mid valve lift flow gains more easily translate into extra power than high lift flow gains which are more likely to be capped by other restrictions. As most people only ever look at the peak flow number they can frequently misled about the power potential. The whole flow curve is important and my own algorithms developed over 25 years take all of it into account. This is not a topic to be discussed lightly or with simplistic intergoogle words of wisdom or misunderstood anecdotes.

PeterBurgess

775 posts

147 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
I couldn't find em either Mikesmile

We recorded a drop in inlet air flow when port split in MGB head radiused but increase in bhp as the flow could swap from port to port more easily.In fact the split being formed at the port face by making the port much larger then power testing as the split was ground further back then radiused showed linear improvements with increase of rpms as the start of the split went nearer the valves. Ultimately power plummeted when the split was ground too far back, ironically we showed a gain on the flow bench at this point!!!! Jury still out on whether horizontal channels on the port split also increases bhp.

Peter

delcbr

Original Poster:

84 posts

180 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
Left one is after right one is before?

227bhp

10,203 posts

129 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
Yes.

Boosted LS1

21,190 posts

261 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
short side radius is better.

Boosted LS1

21,190 posts

261 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
PeterBurgess said:
I couldn't find em either Mikesmile


Peter
I'm pissed off that my factory cnc race GM heads seem to be so lacking, lol. I think i'll stick with the GM item and boost. They'll be easily replaceable if ever I need one.

Oh, it revs like a motorbike. Lets get the TR back on the road :-)

Inline__engine

195 posts

137 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
its pretty simple sometimes a flow loss means less power, sometimes the same power or sometimes more power....it really depends what the head is bolted to during operation and other characteristics of the cylinder head.

the engine doesnt actually care what the flow bench reads for CFM

AER

1,142 posts

271 months

Sunday 27th August 2017
quotequote all
I've always assumed the bigger your CFM, the more power you had on tap...


oxf88

44 posts

57 months

Saturday 11th January 2020
quotequote all
Bumping this as I have the same question, but for Aston Martin. I know of Bamford Rose but is there anyone else? (David Appleby don't port cylinder heads afaik)

Caddyshack

10,996 posts

207 months

Saturday 11th January 2020
quotequote all
Mark Shead is the guru for turboed (Cossie and mitsu evo) engines but as he gets experts to do his heads to his spec I bet he knows who to use for any other head.