The plinth is good. All hail the plinth.

The plinth is good. All hail the plinth.

Author
Discussion

Slarti

Original Poster:

1,828 posts

156 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
JohnG1 said:
"We have nothing to fear but fear itself"

The plinth is wrong and should be removed. The prosecution rests.
And youv already put your money where your mouth is there! smile sorry, couldn't resist!

yeti

10,523 posts

277 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
The plinth is actually yuour 'bumper'. It complies with the crash regs and will take a crash up to 8mph (IIRC) with no damge to the car. That's how it can be sold in the US of the Americas without massive ugly impact bumpers.

JohnG1

3,472 posts

207 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
JohnG1 said:
The plinth is wrong and should be removed. The prosecution rests.
Agreed. Would it have saved your front splitter in the little parking fiasco though?
Nope. The impact was seven or eight inches to the near-side of the plinth. And I hit the steel corner of a wall - hence so much damage at such a low speed.

George H

14,707 posts

166 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
The plinth is actually yuour 'bumper'. It complies with the crash regs and will take a crash up to 8mph (IIRC) with no damge to the car. That's how it can be sold in the US of the Americas without massive ugly impact bumpers.
I thought front plates weren't a legal requirement over there? Plus aren't they a different size - i.e. taller and narrower?

mikey k

13,012 posts

218 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
I thought front plates weren't a legal requirement over there? Plus aren't they a different size - i.e. taller and narrower?
It varies from state to state

theno23

865 posts

212 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
Slarti said:
As in the satnav and bluetooth options allow buyers to tick the mental box that says "hmmm, i need satnav and bluetooth" - now that i've used both in my car, I can see no other practical purpose.
Interesting. The satnav gets a lot of hate, but I actually think it's OK (I have the latest disks). The graphics and UI are deeply ugly, but once you've coerced it into believing in your destination I found the voice instructions pretty decent, and when you get lost or ignore it it recovers pretty well. I actually prefer it to my one generation old TomTom. Maybe I'm just a sucker for the clipped vowels dominatrix voice wink

The bluetooth isn't the best, and you have to yell a bit to be understood "I'M IN THE CAR", but it beats not having it at all. I've had some interesting conversations with people I've not spoken to it in years due to the confusion between the mic and iPhone voice dialing too. Bonus!

- Steve (having a half-full day, obviously)

JohnG1

3,472 posts

207 months

Wednesday 11th January 2012
quotequote all
theno23 said:
Maybe I'm just a sucker for the clipped vowels dominatrix voice wink
Oh yes. Miss Fierce Whiplash as she was named in my car (by a friend).

MichaelV8V

650 posts

263 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
I can't tolerate the woman, she sounds like a heavy smoker to me

Much prefer the mans voice, I think he's called Martin

ShortTimers

112 posts

168 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
[quote=MichaelV8V]I can't tolerate the woman, she sounds like a heavy smoker to me




I likle the sound of that smokin

Slarti

Original Poster:

1,828 posts

156 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
MichaelV8V said:
I can't tolerate the woman, she sounds like a heavy smoker to me

Much prefer the mans voice, I think he's called Martin
I think the woman is called Keith