RE: BMW releases Z4 M roadster

RE: BMW releases Z4 M roadster

Wednesday 26th October 2005

BMW releases Z4 M roadster

M version forced by slow sales and tough competition


none
none
BMW Z4 M Roadster
BMW Z4 M Roadster

BMW will make an M4 after all, as the UK arm has just announced. After denying that it would, BMW has been coerced into making an M version of its slow-selling Z4 roadster, presumably with the aim of adding a little lustre to the range and compete with cars such as the Porsche Boxster.

The Z4 M Roadster, as it's officially called, will output a meaty 343bhp from its 3.2-litre straight six, offering zero to 62mph acceleration of five seconds and an electronically limited top speed of 155mph.

The Detroit Auto Show in January 2006 will also see the launch of updates for the rest of the range. The new Z4 will feature a new engine line-up, new gearbox options, and styling tweaks.

M Roadster details

The M Roadster gets BMW's award-winning straight-six three to four-litre champion delivers max power at a whizzy 7,900rpm and 269lb-ft of torque at 4,900rpm. The powerplant is mated to a six-speed manual gearbox and BMW M’s variable M differential for improved traction, especially when accelerating out of bends.

The new Z4 M Roadster uses a hydraulic power assistance system, compared to the standard car which uses electromechanical steering. It also loses the much-maligned run-flat tyres which should provide improved cornering on poor surfaces. The brakes consist of the M division's floating compound braking system, the same as found in the BMW M3 CSL, resulting in a 62mph to zero stopping distance of just 34 metres, according to BMW's numbers.

It'll look different too. Changes at the front include the lower valance, larger air intakes and dual styling lines on the bonnet. From behind, it gets M-style quad-tailpipes and aerodynamic diffuser. It sits on double-spoke 18-inch alloy wheels with 225/45ZR18 tyres at the front and 255/40ZR18s (rear).

There are three new paint options: Sepang Bronze, Interlagos Blue and Imola Red. Inside, there's more leather than in the standard car, in black, red, bronze or brown, trimmed in aluminium, black carbon leather or walnut.

Standard Z4 Roadster updates

Engines

Topping the new range is the Z4 3.0si, featuring BMW’s magnesium alloy in-line six. Featuring Valvetronic valve lift and VANOS valve timing, the Z4 3.0si develops 265bhp at 6,600rpm and 232lb-ft of torque at 2,750rpm, propelling it to 62mph in 5.7 seconds. BMW reckoned it'll still crack 32mpg overall.

There'll be a pair of 2.5-litre sixes, the 2.5si and 2.5i, with the 2.5i delivering some 20 per cent less power and 10 per cent less torque than the 2.5si's 218hp and 184lb-ft of torque, and a sprint time to 62mph of 6.5 seconds.

The only engine carried over from the out-going range is the four-cylinder Z4 2.0i launched in April 2005. The two-litre mill delivers 150bhp at 6,200rpm and 148lb-ft of torque at 3,600rpm, with performance of  8.2 seconds for the dash to 62mph.

Transmission

All new Z4 models come as standard with a six-speed gearbox, although buyers of the 2.5si and 3.0si can specify a six-speed, paddle-shifted auto box.

Sport models

Sports pack options add 18-inch M double spoke or optional composite alloy wheel, leather-clad M Sports seats, three-spoke M leather steering wheel and M Sports suspension.

Design tweaks

External changes are few and subtle. The shoulder line now extends all the way to the front air dam rather than stopping at the bonnet edge, a wider air intake dominates the lower valance and the kidney grille being more inset. The headlights have been re-designed and now include corona light rings -- angel eyes -- as standard on all cars specified with xenon lamps (standard on the M Roadster).

From the side, US-style side reflectors are integrated into the front wheel arches that also house new alloy wheel designs.

From the rear, the tail lamps now feature Z8-style horizontal light conductor rods and vary in brightness according to the braking force applied.

Author
Discussion

billb

Original Poster:

3,198 posts

267 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
front looks even more of a mess now

r988

7,495 posts

231 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
Red and blue, bad colours for a Z4, bronze should be ok though.

Where did this 'si' designation come from? and what does the s stand for?

About time they made an //M version, lazy gits, as if anyone believed they weren't going to make one

also

where's the new //M Coupe?

paulothegangsta

47 posts

232 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
Styling looks as camp as the (Z3) M Roadster... Bring on the M coupe, that looks ace!

>> Edited by paulothegangsta on Wednesday 26th October 11:11

MonsieurX

15 posts

249 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
No V8, still no Coupe thus no sale!

i'll keep my Z3Coupe! That's no hair dresser's car!

ScottBN3

33 posts

231 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
Apparently the Z4 was inspired by the middle image on the top row of this page:

www.oceanlight.com/html/whale_shark.html

britvette

5 posts

227 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
It might be expensive, but at least it looks awful(!)

RichardR

2,892 posts

270 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
ScottBN3 said:
Apparently the Z4 was inspired by the middle image on the top row of this page:

www.oceanlight.com/html/whale_shar
Oh, I don't know... looks more like a 407 Coupe to me!

vinceh

154 posts

230 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
Doesn't matter what they do to it, its still a mess from the 'Cars Bangle Spannered' school of car design .

To paraphrase the saying ....

If it looks like a (lame) duck, sounds like a (lame) duck and goes like a (lame) duck, it probably is a (lame) duck.

They should kill it really, or at least completely re-skin it.

All of this written by a life-long BMW fan.

>> Edited by vinceh on Wednesday 26th October 14:46

dvs_dave

8,768 posts

227 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
BMW make a TVR Tuscan Convertible......only not quite as fast.

D-Angle

4,468 posts

244 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
Can't see it doing much for the Z4, but I think it's going to make a cracking bargain on the second-hand market...

_VTEC_

2,429 posts

247 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
I quite like this. It blatantly possesses all the right bits. - Slip-diff, S54 engine, manual, sans run-flats, hydraulic steering, CSL brakes. What's everyone moaning about?

marx

61 posts

237 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
Wasn't this the z car that was originally going to have only decent 6's in to overcome the z3's image problem? So BMW go & put in a 2.0 & 2.2 in! Why not stick in a small diesel & go for the 206cc / tigra crowd

bmw114

676 posts

239 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
_VTEC_ said:
I quite like this. It blatantly possesses all the right bits. - Slip-diff, S54 engine, manual, sans run-flats, hydraulic steering, CSL brakes. What's everyone moaning about?



People seam to love BMW`s or hate them, I think jealousy has something to do with it.

Merefield

86 posts

228 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
_VTEC_ said:
I quite like this. It blatantly possesses all the right bits. - Slip-diff, S54 engine, manual, sans run-flats, hydraulic steering, CSL brakes. What's everyone moaning about?






I agree VTEC, its the best Z4 yet (obviously!) and they've addressed the cars major weaknesses, creating a pretty compelling package.

And I've always admired the cars unique and challenging looks.

I like it very much indeed!

Name me another good front engined, RWD, two seater, high performance convertible sports car < 50k that goes like stink (and is likely to clock up > 30,000 miles without an engine rebuild or three)


>> Edited by Merefield on Wednesday 26th October 19:51

summit7

667 posts

231 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
VTEC - people are complaining because the design is a mess of lines and slashes and cutouts without any overall structure and purpose. From the driving/mechanics point of view I think people feel BMW have just put together out of the parts bin things that BMW feel will appeal to PH people without getting to core values. I used to own a Z3M coupe which was stripped out and focussed I loved it. This somehow with 20BHP more, more weight, unresolved styling and 6 years later has not moved the game on for BMW and is not right.

Zod

35,295 posts

260 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
A lot of people on PH will jump into any new BMW thread to proclaim their hatred of the car.

I have never quite resolved the fromt of the Z4, but a coupe with the S54 engine would be very tempting to me, especially if they put the CSL airbox on it.

summit7

667 posts

231 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
I think Zod that as BMW drove expansion through mass market appeal they left us PH's behind for the sake of money. As I have said before, as a company that was in tune with PH's, as a previous buyer/owner of 5 BMW's nothing they sell appeals to me on price/performance/image they have just changed the segment they are selling to and wonder why all of a sudden we don't queue up for their 'sports' models.
I don't want a mass market car that still pretends to be 'special' - Summit

XTR2Turbo

1,533 posts

233 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
The Z4 is the only current bangle BMW that works for me. The problem is the pricing level takes it into Porsche teritory and BMW vs Porsche badge is not an even contest for most buyer. It puts it in a bit of a no mans land ahead of the Honda and crossfire but not enough below the Porsche. Still prefer it to the Merc though - horid messy looking car and even worse in the metal.

There are some superb buys to be had on low mileage second hand cars. If the Z4 pitched 10% cheaper i think it would sell well.

_VTEC_

2,429 posts

247 months

Wednesday 26th October 2005
quotequote all
summit7 said:
VTEC - people are complaining because the design is a mess of lines and slashes and cutouts without any overall structure and purpose. From the driving/mechanics point of view I think people feel BMW have just put together out of the parts bin things that BMW feel will appeal to PH people without getting to core values. I used to own a Z3M coupe which was stripped out and focussed I loved it. This somehow with 20BHP more, more weight, unresolved styling and 6 years later has not moved the game on for BMW and is not right.


OK, I admit, it's not really a looker. But I recon this car might have some substance to it. BMW are usually very good at responding to criticsm, and the Z4 has had a bit of a pasting for ride quality and other things.

Alpina made a good hash of the Z4, I don't see why BMW can't do the same, or better.

Although we're all just prophesying until EVO do a proper test.

blutusc

172 posts

249 months

Thursday 27th October 2005
quotequote all
Sorry guys but only one word springs to mind with yet another incarnation of the Z4:

MINGING.............................

They may have put in a decent engine (finally), but if BMW continue to churn out quite possibly the ugliest cars in the world (in fact the only decent looking ones in a long lign-up are the X5 and 3 series convertible (outgoing model)) then they will unsurprisingly find them slow to shift. Not rocket science really. I don't really like porkers, but as you can basically have a boxter S for the same money, why would anyone in their right mind go for the beemer over that.

No-ones going to want to shell out 40-60k for cars that might drive OK but that's about it, and as TOPGEAR magazine puts it: "didn't peter wheeler's dog recently beat chris bangle in a design competition!!!!!"

Nuff said....