Did BMW make any 8 Series with a manual box?

Did BMW make any 8 Series with a manual box?

Author
Discussion

Job38

1,968 posts

238 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
BadRedWedge said:
BadRedWedge said:
Very interesting thread, thinking about an 8?0 to replace my 450SE so what do I get ? an 840 ? an 850? a 4L 4.4L 5L etc etc. now I know this is a subjective question, and I dont want to start WW3 but which one is best,and what should I look out for ?? We want to use the car as a weekend / GT.

Thanks for any help
rolleyes
No expert, buy I'll have a go:

Consensus would appear to be that the later 4.4 840Ci Sport is the most sensible and best looking choice.

But, almost all are autos (see figures above) and you may left with the nagging thought that you could probably get a V12 for less money.

The 850CSi has a 5.7 M Sport engine with manual box, but only 160 ever made in RHD, so very rare, and very expensive.

burriana

16,556 posts

256 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
850 CSi will, as a rule of thumb, cost double the equivalent 850 Ci.

julian64

14,317 posts

256 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
I used to have a 1991 850i RHD manual smile. I sold it last year for 6K.

It was the best gearbox BMW ever made or is likely to make.

Talkwrench

909 posts

235 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
julian64 said:
I used to have a 1991 850i RHD manual smile. I sold it last year for 6K.

It was the best gearbox BMW ever made or is likely to make.
And the heaviest!
When I changed the clutch on my CSi, I couldn't believe the weight of the thing! Although the case is all lovely ribbed alloy, the internals are massive and very heavy. Every gear has a triple synchromesh cone assembly and the actual cogs and bearings are very large. People in the States pump 1000bhp through these boxes and rarely have a problem.
They can be a but clunky and agricultural when cold but warmed up and filled with the right oil, they really are superb.

burriana

16,556 posts

256 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
Talking of which ... how are my oil seals coming along? biggrin

julian64

14,317 posts

256 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
Talkwrench said:
julian64 said:
I used to have a 1991 850i RHD manual smile. I sold it last year for 6K.

It was the best gearbox BMW ever made or is likely to make.
And the heaviest!
When I changed the clutch on my CSi, I couldn't believe the weight of the thing! Although the case is all lovely ribbed alloy, the internals are massive and very heavy. Every gear has a triple synchromesh cone assembly and the actual cogs and bearings are very large. People in the States pump 1000bhp through these boxes and rarely have a problem.
They can be a but clunky and agricultural when cold but warmed up and filled with the right oil, they really are superb.
When I took my gearbox off, it required three guys to lift it down from the car. I then spent a week trying to manufacture a long enough level arm to take the nut off the front of the box, and going everywhere to find a boxspanner that would fit in the space. Inside it was a thing of beauty. There was no need to make a gearbox that good for the car, I don't know what was in the heads of the designers. The M5 gearbox I have now is about half the size to cope with one third more power.

burriana

16,556 posts

256 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
julian64 said:
I don't know what was in the heads of the designers.
We've been given a development budget of $1 billion, we'd better spend it!

Job38

1,968 posts

238 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
So, are we saying the over-engineering is a good thing because its bomb-proof; or are we saying its a bad thing because its unnecessarily heavy and over-complex? scratchchin

Mustard

6,992 posts

247 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
Job38 said:
So, are we saying the over-engineering is a good thing because its bomb-proof; or are we saying its a bad thing because its unnecessarily heavy and over-complex? scratchchin
Depends if its working or not! biglaugh

burriana

16,556 posts

256 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
Mustard said:
Job38 said:
So, are we saying the over-engineering is a good thing because its bomb-proof; or are we saying its a bad thing because its unnecessarily heavy and over-complex? scratchchin
Depends if its working or not! biglaugh
Depends how many brake horses you're planning on putting through wink

Job38

1,968 posts

238 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
I'm thinking 450bhp and 450Ib/ft should be enough to be getting on with........wink

burriana

16,556 posts

256 months

Monday 24th September 2007
quotequote all
Job38 said:
I'm thinking 450bhp and 450Ib/ft should be enough to be getting on with........wink
I was thinking more of 550 biggrin

BadRedWedge

3,450 posts

230 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
Thanks Al, thanks 38, lots to think about scratchchin

Talkwrench

909 posts

235 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
Job38 said:
So, are we saying the over-engineering is a good thing because its bomb-proof; or are we saying its a bad thing because its unnecessarily heavy and over-complex? scratchchin
Over engineering is a very good thing when you are looking at a gearbox that is probably 10+ years old! While mine was out, I planned on changing anything that was showing signs of wear (it had done 100k miles). I ended up replacing..... erm.... the bushes on the gear linkage outside the box! Everything else was like new.

Job38

1,968 posts

238 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
That's what we like to hear. thumbup

julian64

14,317 posts

256 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
When I couldn't find the cause of the rattle in my gearbox. I took my gearbox to a large firm of transmission specialists in gravesend, Kent.

They couldn't believe the gearbox had done 100K miles. They managed to get hold of the float/micrometer settings from getrag, and mic'd the whole thing. They finally turned round and said the gearbox was 'as new' perfect and the rattle wasn't comming from the gearbox. (They subsequently turned out to be right)

They did say they had gearboxes that could take 1000Hp, but even they weren't much compared to the BMW 8 series gearbox.

burriana

16,556 posts

256 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
So "full throttle then pinging the brake off" starts at V.Max shouldn't be a problem then? biggrin

Talkwrench

909 posts

235 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
burriana said:
So "full throttle then pinging the brake off" starts at V.Max shouldn't be a problem then? biggrin
Ahh, we were talking about the 6 speed manual box. The autos are not quite so over engineered. Theyre still tough boxes though and last a very long time. A good few of the twin turbo boys in the States run bog standard auto boxes in their V12's without any issues.

burriana

16,556 posts

256 months

Tuesday 25th September 2007
quotequote all
Talkwrench said:
A good few of the twin turbo boys in the States run bog standard auto boxes in their V12's without any issues.
Jolly good ... always nice to have the next improvement lined up smile

MitchT

Original Poster:

15,974 posts

211 months

Thursday 27th September 2007
quotequote all
Okay... so I rule out the 8 on the grounds of its size maybe rendering it a tad awkward for my favourite roads... and rule it out further on the basis that I don't want an auto and manuals are too hard to find... and then I discover this baby... (Scroll down to the Estoril Blue 840Ci Sport). http://www.gtsbillingshurst.co.uk/8000.html

Now this is so utterly gorgeous I'd buy it anyway, despite it being an auto! My only concerns are that the distance of 202 miles from where I live would make arranging an inspection with an expert somewhat difficult, and they've omitted the mileage which is what dealers do when the mileage is so high that they they know it would put prospective buyers off if they included it in the ad.